HomeCarbon NewsTexas Withdraws $8.5 Billion from BlackRock Over ESG Investing

Texas Withdraws $8.5 Billion from BlackRock Over ESG Investing

The decision by the Texas State Board of Education to terminate its investment partnership with BlackRock has reignited the debate surrounding Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing in the United States. With $8.5 billion withdrawn from the investment giant, the move underscores the deepening divide between political and investment strategies.

At the center of this controversy is BlackRock, the worldโ€™s largest asset manager and a vocal advocate for ESG principles.

While BlackRockโ€™s leadership in promoting sustainability and climate action has garnered praise from many investors and stakeholders, it has also drawn sharp criticism from some Republican politicians in states like Texas. These politicians accuse BlackRock of advancing a left-wing agenda and undermining traditional energy sectors.

The Rise of ESG Investing

ESG investing, short for Environmental, Social, and Governance investing, evaluates companies based on their performance across various responsibility metrics and standards to assess their suitability for investment.

By using these standards, investors can identify businesses that show strong environmental stewardship, social impact, and effective governance practices. ESG investing is also called sustainable investing, impact investing, and socially responsible investing.

Many ESG investors put a higher value on the environmental factor and remove environmental polluters from their portfolios. They instead decide to invest in companies that opt to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. 

The state of Texas has been a battleground in the anti-ESG movement. State officials are taking decisive actions against companies and investors perceived to be prioritizing social and environmental concerns over economic interests.

For instance, Texas recently banned UK bank Barclays from participating in the municipal bond market due to its ESG policies. The state has also considered divesting from asset managers accused of boycotting energy companies.

Texas isnโ€™t alone in rallying against ESG investing. In 2023, states with Republican-controlled legislatures saw the enactment of at least 25 anti-ESG bills.

Utah, in particular, passed 5 of these bills, contributing significantly to the overall count. Despite these legislative successes, a few bills are still pending approval. These developments were reported on a website maintained by Lichtensteinโ€™s team, dedicated to tracking such bills.

Anti-ESG laws in the United States, 2023

Texasโ€™s anti-ESG stance may appeal to some constituents. However, it could come at a significant cost to investors and the stateโ€™s economy. 

A study conducted by the Texas County & District Retirement System estimated potential losses of over $6 billion in ten years from prohibiting ESG investing in public retirement systems. This underscores the complex trade-offs involved in balancing financial returns with social and environmental objectives.

Moreover, MSCIโ€™s report showed that the top 20 ESG funds saw increasing return contributions because of better ESG performance.

investing with ESG funds
Chart from MSCI

Texas Takes a Stand

In defending its decision to terminate the partnership with BlackRock, the Texas State Board of Education cited legislation prohibiting investment in companies that boycott certain energy firms.

Board Chairman Aaron Kinsey expressed concern about BlackRockโ€™s impact on Texasโ€™s oil and gas industry. The Texas Permanent School Fund (PSF) gets its money from the industryโ€™s revenue. 

In a statement posted on X, Aaron Kinsey, PSF Chair, noted that:

โ€œBlackRockโ€™s dominant and persistent leadership in the ESG movement immeasurably damages our stateโ€™s oil and gas economy and the very companies that generate revenues for our PSFโ€ฆ The PSF will not stand idle as our financial future is attacked by Wall Street.โ€

The statement reflects growing concerns among certain stakeholders in Texas regarding the influence of ESG considerations on investment decisions. And that it may also have potential impacts on the stateโ€™s energy sector. According to the state BOEโ€™s website, Kinsey is the CEO of American Patrols, an aviation oilfield services company in Midland.

Critics argue that this may undermine the long-term financial health of PSF and limit its ability to achieve investment objectives. 

BlackRock Defends its Position

BlackRock has faced mounting scrutiny from Republican politicians and activists who accuse the company of promoting a leftist agenda. Last year, the asset manager inked a deal to invest $550 million in Occidental Petroleumโ€™s Direct Air Capture (DAC) plant in Ector County, Texas. 

In response to the stateโ€™s decision, BlackRockโ€™s CEO Larry Fink has defended the companyโ€™s engagement with the energy industry. He stated in an email that:

โ€œThe decision ignores our $120 billion investment in Texas public energy companies and defies expert advice. As a fiduciary, politics should never outweigh performance, especially for taxpayers.โ€

Despite these criticisms, BlackRock emphasized its significant investments in U.S. energy companies. Moreover, the company noted that itโ€™s instrumental in assisting millions of Texans in investing and saving for retirement. Theyโ€™ve also channeled over $300 billion into Texas-based companies, infrastructure, and municipalities, with a significant portion, totaling $125 billion, directed toward the energy sector.

Last week, the investment giant published a report identifying key developments that will impact low-carbon transition investment opportunities and risks in 2024.

As the debate over ESG investing continues to evolve, investors and policymakers must carefully weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks of incorporating environmental, social, and governance considerations into investment decisions.

Most Popular
LATEST CARBON NEWS

Morgan Stanley, Citi and Bank of America Exit Net-Zero Alliance: Whatโ€™s Next for Sustainable Finance?

Several major U.S. banks, including Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, and Bank of America, have recently announced their departure from the Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA). This...

Constellation Secures Groundbreaking $1 Billion Clean Nuclear Energy Deal with Federal Government

Constellation, the largest producer of clean, emissions-free energy in the United States, has secured over $1 billion in contracts from the U.S. General Services...

Philippines Aims for Nickel Dominance with New Mining Reforms

Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. is set to revitalize the country's mining sector, particularly its nickel industry, through a proposed reform to the Philippine...

2025 Uranium Outlook: Will this Critical Commodity Endure its Golden Glow?

Top research agencies and industrialists are expecting a steady uranium production in 2025. They believe demand will be driven by rising global demand for...
CARBON INVESTOR EDUCATION

Green AI Explained: Fueling Innovation with a Smaller Carbon Footprint

As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to transform industries and unlock new opportunities, its environmental impact is also a matter of concern. While AI holds...

Whatโ€™s Shaping North Americaโ€™s Natural Gas in 2024? Insights from Wood Mackenzie

The natural gas market has immensely benefitted this year from robust storage levels and stabilized prices after the sharp spikes of 2022. However, challenges...

EUโ€™s Green Bonds to Slash 55 MTS of COโ‚‚ Annually. Can it Hit Europeโ€™s 2050 Net Zero Target?

The European Commission released its NextGenerationEU (NGEU) Green Bonds Allocation and Impact Report 2024 explaining how proceeds from green bonds are being used to...

What is COP29 and Why Is It Hailed as The โ€œFinance COPโ€?

As climate change worsens, the UNโ€™s 29th annual climate conference, a.k.a. COP29, taking place from November 11 to 22, 2024, in Baku, Azerbaijan, is...