HomeCarbon NewsWhy US States Must Take Charge of Their Own Carbon Sequestration Regulation

Why US States Must Take Charge of Their Own Carbon Sequestration Regulation

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is urging states to establish their own regulatory frameworks for carbon sequestration. This ensued when lawmakers intensely questioned the agency’s limited permit issuances. 

In a congressional hearing, an EPA official expressed strong support for state efforts to acquire primary regulatory authority for Class VI wells used for underground carbon injection. 

What Are Class VI Wells and Their Role in Carbon Capture and Sequestration?

Class VI wells are used to inject carbon dioxide (CO2) into deep rock formations as illustrated below. This long-term underground carbon storage is called geologic sequestration (GS). 

Class VI injection wellsGS is a type of carbon capture and storage (CCS), a technology used to reduce carbon dioxide emissions to address climate change.

Common sources of CO2 for geologic sequestration include carbon captured from point sources like from steel and cement production facilities. It can also be from energy production such as power plants or directly from the atmosphere. 

The potential for these wells to manage and safely sequester captured carbon is immense. For instance, the Colorado Geological Survey estimated 720 billion tons of CO2 could be safely stored in the state’s deep underground formations.

However, widespread development of CCS projects at scale has been slow, partly because of Class VI well permitting challenges. 

Despite reviewing over 150 permit applications from over 50 carbon sequestration projects, the EPA has only granted approval for 2 wells in Illinois thus far. A third project in Indiana is pending approval, which would mark the first permit issued under the current administration.

Recent legislation, including the bipartisan infrastructure law of 2021 and the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, has allocated substantial funds for carbon capture and direct air capture (DAC) initiatives. 

2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act:

  • Allocated $5 million/year through 2026 to EPA to permit Class VI wells and another $50 million for the agency to distribute to states with their own Class VI permitting.
  • Allocated $2.25 billion investment for commercial large-scale carbon sequestration projects (storing 50 million metric tons of CO2) and associated pipeline infrastructure.

2022 Inflation Reduction Act (Changes to the Section 45Q tax credit scheme):

  • Amended the baseline credit to $17/ton of CO2 captured and stored, with the potential to increase to $85/ton.
  • Introduced a new 45Q credit for DAC and carbon sequestration – $36/ton and up to $180/ton.

Moreover, under the Clean Air Act, the EPA may mandate power plants to incorporate carbon capture technology to ensure compliance.

Bruno Pigott, principal deputy assistant administrator at the EPA’s Office of Water, emphasized the role of the Class VI well application process in the success of these projects during the hearing. 

The EPA also initiated the application process for $48 million in grants funded by the bipartisan infrastructure law. The funding aims to expedite the deployment of technologies reliant on Class VI wells.

US states control over underground carbon sequestration regulation

Amid discussions, an executive director of Carbon180, expressed optimism about the potential to reduce the costs associated with DAC. However, Burns underscored concerns regarding the need for a robust and efficient infrastructure, stating that:

“We’re going to need to store billions of tons of CO2, and we need a robust and well-functioning Class VI permitting process.”

Fixing Delays to Fast-Track Carbon Capture Efforts

The EPA has already given Class VI well primacy upon North Dakota and Wyoming, with Louisiana’s final approval still pending. Meanwhile, West Virginia, Arizona, and Texas have applications currently under consideration.

However, lawmakers have expressed frustration with the EPA’s protracted review period for states’ primacy applications, citing Wyoming’s nearly 3-year-long process. 

During the hearing, Pigott was questioned on the substantial delays of the permitting process, highlighting Louisiana’s role as a model for various elements of the application. The state received conditional approval in May this year after submitting an application in 2019. 

Over half the carbon sequestration projects awaiting permits for Class VI wells are in the Gulf Coast region. This includes Chevron’s carbon capture project Bayou Bend, covering 40,000-acre expanse on the region.

The EPA acknowledged the concern and said that the agency is currently sifting through tens of thousands of comments on the proposal to grant primacy to Louisiana.

The federal agency noted that states must meet the agency’s minimum standards and establish necessary administrative and enforcement programs to qualify for Class VI well primacy.

The EPA’s encouragement for states to establish their own regulatory frameworks for carbon sequestration reflects a concerted effort to fast-track the deployment of Class VI wells. While recent legislation has allocated significant funds for carbon capture initiatives, challenges in the permit issuance process underscore the need for a streamlined approach to bolster carbon sequestration projects nationwide.

Most Popular
LATEST CARBON NEWS

HSBC Drops Carbon Credit Trading Amid Voluntary Carbon Market’s $1B Decline

HSBC Holdings Plc, Europe’s largest bank, has abandoned its plans to establish a carbon credits trading desk, per a Bloomberg report. The decision reflects...

Zefiro Methane Tackles Methane Emissions: Completes its First Oklahoma-Based Gas Well Remediation Project

Zefiro Methane Corp. (ZEFI) announced that its subsidiary, Plants & Goodwin, Inc. (P&G), has successfully completed its first gas well remediation project in Oklahoma....

COP29: Singapore and Peru Seal the Deal on Article 6 Carbon Credits Framework

Singapore’s Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) announced on Nov. 21, during the COP29 climate summit in Azerbaijan, that it has substantively concluded negotiations...

Indonesia’s Bold Push to Net Zero: Shutting Down All Coal Plants in 15 Years

Indonesia has unveiled an ambitious plan to transition away from fossil fuels and achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, a decade earlier than its previous...
CARBON INVESTOR EDUCATION

What is COP29 and Why Is It Hailed as The “Finance COP”?

As climate change worsens, the UN’s 29th annual climate conference, a.k.a. COP29, taking place from November 11 to 22, 2024, in Baku, Azerbaijan, is...

Carbon Credits vs. Carbon Offsets

Carbon Credits vs. Carbon Offsets: What's the Difference? At their core, both carbon credits and carbon offsets are accounting mechanisms. They provide a way to...

Who Verifies Carbon Credits?

Carbon credit verification is a rigorous process that involves various steps to ensure the legitimacy of the credits.

The Ultimate Guide to Understanding Carbon Credits

Everything you need to know about carbon credits, voluntary and compulsory carbon markets, and carbon investment...