Chevron Triples its Low-Carbon Investment to $10 Billion

Chevron recently announced a $10 billion dollar investment into low carbon business initiatives. Half of that budget will be spent on reducing emissions from fossil fuel initiatives.

Here is the breakdown of the investment:

    • $3 billion for Carbon capture and offsets
    • $2 billion on reducing greenhouse gas
    • $3 billion on renewable fuels
    • $2 billion on hydrogen energy

To achieve this Chevron will increase:

    • Renewable fuels production to 100,000 barrels per day
    • Renewable natural gas output to 40 billion British thermal units (BTUs) per day.
    • Hydrogen production to 150,000 tonnes per year to provide industrial, power, and heavy-duty transportation clients
    • Carbon capture and offsets to 25 million tonnes per year.

This $10 billion investment’s goal is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from its oil and gas production by 35 percent by 2028.

The company will be releasing its climate report later this year and will revisit its net-zero goal at that time.

Critics have stated that Chevron’s focus is on offsetting emissions from oil and gas production rather than lowering oil output.

European oil companies have set the benchmark for the transition away from fossil fuels by investing more in renewables and meeting 2050 emission objectives.

Chevron CEO, Michael Wirth, said the only a small percentage of the company’s shareholders presently support a European oil company strategy of investing in less lucrative solar and wind power.

US-based Chevron, Exxon, and Occidental Petroleum have also pledged to cut carbon emissions by supporting carbon capture and storage and doubling down on oil.

Commercial Real Estate Investment Firm to Offset Carbon Internally

The commercial real estate industry contributes between 30% and 40% of global carbon emissions each year.

To combat the amount of carbon being pumped into the atmosphere, a property trust has chosen to make an investment this week that could revolutionize the commercial real estate industry.

Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust (SLI) purchased 1,447 hectares (3,575 acres) of land in Cairngorm National Park in Scotland.

The objective is to plant 1.5 million trees to offset carbon emissions from its property portfolio. Their market cap is currently listed as £275 million.

While commercial real estate companies have been looking into energy-efficient retrofitting, solar installations, and carbon credit purchases, SLI has taken carbon offsetting to the next level by offsetting their own carbon themselves.

They purchased the property for £7.5 million, with the cost of planting trees covered by grants.

SLI is paying approximately £38 per ton of carbon (about $53 US dollars per ton). Since the global carbon market is expected to boom to $22T by 2050, it’s safe to say that SLI sees potential for growth and profits. The project is expected to offset 195,630 tons of carbon until 2060 – representing 73% of the company’s carbon output.

In addition to this land purchase, SLI installed a major Photo Voltaic (PV) solar panel scheme on one of its assets. The panels are expected to save the equivalent of 229 tons of carbon in the first year. SLI is also looking to roll out additional solar panel installations across its portfolio.

With environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues at the forefront of SLI’s mind, Jason Baggaley – SLI’s Manager – has recently sold several older assets, utilizing funds to invest within more sustainable properties.

Reducing carbon emission continues to be at the top of consumer, company, and government agendas. SLI’s forward-thinking initiatives should present a lucrative opportunity for years to come. If more commercial real estate companies follow suit, carbon emissions will drop, revenues will increase, and the environment will improve.

Could the price of oil hit $200 a barrel because of climate change?

Oman’s energy minister warned conference attendees recently “Recommending that we should no longer invest in new oil… I think that’s extremely dangerous.”

His biggest fear is that if we abruptly stop investing in fossil fuel, “there will be energy starvation, and the price of energy will just shoot (up).”

The United States Energy Information Administration’s long-term projection issued in February anticipates crude oil to hit $89 in the US in 2030 and $185 by 2050.

They admit that several factors could impact these figures, including other supply sources, access to renewable energy, and emissions taxes.

According to S&P Global Platts, OPEC is worried. Their concern is that an increase in oil prices could affect market volatility and threaten oil project investments.

Their concerns haven’t seemed to stop the push for net-zero emissions. Carbon pricing is taking off as global carbon markets continue to expand. In fact, countries that represent 70% of the global gross domestic product are committed to meeting international climate objectives – with all eyes set on eliminating emissions.

The Minister for Industry and Advanced Technology in the United Arab Emirates, Sultan al-Jaber, is not as concerned. “Even in the most ambitious energy transition scenario, oil and as will still be needed for many decades to come.” He went on to say that the Middle East’s reserves account for many of the least carbon-intensive barrels globally.

International Energy Director Fatih Birol said, “It’s an interesting race. Unless everybody finishes the race, nobody wins the race.”

If the oil industry can find ways to utilize its resources to achieve net-zero emissions goals, it may very well flourish — all while helping the world meet its 2050 deadline. With a bit of ingenuity and some unexpected partnerships, concerns of massive increases may become a thing of the past.

Moody’s Warns Carbon Intense Industries Will Be Hit Hardest

Moody’s report on the economic impacts of carbon pricing confirms what most thought: carbon-heavy producers and carbon-heavy consumers will be negatively impacted. However, those investing in carbon-neutral technologies will be poised for growth.

There are two distinct and practical ways that carbon pricing takes place:

• Tax on emissions put in place by governments; or
• Through carbon markets where carbon credits are bought and sold

The practice of carbon pricing has been endorsed by the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the Organization of Economic Co-operations and Development. Currently, 40 national and 25 sub-national jurisdictions have put a price on carbon, with 21.5% of global carbon emissions covered by carbon pricing instruments. This is up from 15.1% in 2020.

Even China – the largest carbon emitter in the world – created its own carbon market. The global carbon market is expected to reach $22 trillion by 2050.

In a press release, Moody’s Vice President and Senior Analyst Anushka Shah said, “In an indication of growing commitment to decarbonization and mid-century net-zero emissions targets, policymakers globally are increasingly advocating carbon pricing systems.”

Right now, the average price for emissions is $2 per ton of carbon – which is not quite at the $25 per ton required per the Paris climate agreement. But governments and businesses are working on getting there. If anything, this report by Moody’s shows, it is truly in their best interest to do so.

According to the Federal Reserve, the total economic cost of a business-as-usual approach to climate change will be $2 trillion more than meeting the Paris targets by 2050 and $50 trillion more by 2100. So, while carbon pricing may seem costly to governments and industries now, the cost of not doing so is far more expensive in the long run.

No matter the economic impacts of carbon pricing, Moody’s said they are preferable to what will happen if the world fails to combat climate change. “The cost of inaction on controlling emissions will accumulate with much greater social and economic costs in the future.”

World’s Largest Carbon-Removal Machine Makes Debut

There is no question about it: carbon must be removed from the atmosphere to stop global warming. This can be achieved through carbon offsetting, which, though highly effective, is a longer process, and through “direct air capture” (DAC).

If you are wondering what DAC is, you are not alone. DAC is essentially massive CO2-vacuums that suck carbon out of the air immediately.

The largest DAC plant in the world made its debut in Iceland this week and is operated by the Swiss engineering startup Climeworks. The plant, known as Orca, will draw in a volume of emissions equal to approximately 870 cars annually. It will reach global capacity by about 50%, adding a dozen smaller plants throughout Europe, Canada, and the US.

Each plant is composed of eight container-sized boxes that use fans to pull in air. CO2 is then filtered out, mixed with water, and pumped into underground wells, where after some time, it turns into stone.

The objective is to sell the captured CO2 stones to manufacturers that can use them for raw materials. The price per carbon unit seized and then converted is currently unknown.

Before launching Orca, Climeworks signed a deal with insurance company Swiss Re for an undisclosed volume of carbon offsets. Though the price per ton hasn’t been made public, Swiss Re press release stated it was “several hundred dollars.”

Though DAC provides an excellent alternative to carbon offsetting, critics aren’t so sure. The cost of building and operating these machines can be exponential. Plus, to be truly effective, the DAC industry will need to remove nearly 10 million tons of carbon per year by 2030, which is a long way away.

With more premium offset projects entering the global carbon market, offsets are uniquely positioned to benefit companies and farmers alike.  Still, DAC is an essential aspect of combating climate change. It can remove carbon at a faster rate while providing companies with eco-friendly materials.

Combined, DAC and carbon offsetting have the potential to make a real difference, helping the world achieve net-zero goals.

Walmart Issues $2 Billion Green Bonds

Walmart recently issued the largest green bond in the United States – worth $2 billion.

The world’s largest retailer has released its first debt with sustainability credentials. This is amid a period of stepped-up efforts to curb carbon emissions, promote recycling, and clean up its supply chain.

One of the projects funded by bonds might be a wide range of environmentally friendly projects, including wind turbines, solar power, energy-efficient refrigerators, electric vehicles, and trash reduction.

It’s part of a $7 billion investment that funds a $2 billion 10-year green bond to support a tender offer.

Walmart has set a goal of achieving zero emissions by the year 2040, and it also plans to lower emissions from its supply chain by a billion metric tons by the year 2030.

James Rich, Senior Portfolio Manager with Aegon Asset Management, stated “It certainly seems like they’re serious about taking a sustainability leadership role within the retail space,”. He went on to further state “I don’t know how other retailers will be able to avoid making similar commitments and changes.”

The gauntlet has been thrown down as Amazon issued a $150M ESG bond earlier in May and Alibaba also raised its first sustainability debt in Feb.

According to Bloomberg, the issuance of “Green” Bonds by firms and governments throughout the world reached $691 billion so far in 2021.

According to banking experts, the $1 Trillion dollar sales mark is set to be broken before the end of the year.

Top Christian Leaders Plead for World to Fight Climate Change

0

For the first time, Pope Francis, the Archbishop of Canterbury, and the Orthodox Christians’ leader issued a joint statement requesting COP26 summit delegates to take immediate action against climate change.

The COP26 climate summit is scheduled to take place in Glasgow, Scotland, this November.

“As leaders of our Churches, we call on everyone, whatever their belief or worldview, to endeavor to listen to the cry of the earth and of people who are poor, examining their behavior and pledging meaningful sacrifices for the sake of the earth which God has given us.”

They also urged people to focus on long-term sustainability rather than short-term gains while keeping the poor in mind.

“Technology has unfolded new possibilities for progress but also for accumulating unrestrained wealth, and many of us behave in ways which demonstrate little concern for other people of the limits of the planet.”

With the global carbon market expected to reach $22T by 2050, the opportunity to positively impact the environment and the world’s most vulnerable populations is endless. In fact, both are a driving force behind Amazon’s new Agroforestry and Restoration Accelerator project, which was announced this week.

In partnership with The Nature Conservancy, their goal is to help 3,000 small farmers in Brazil produce sustainable agriculture. Over 10 million metric tons of carbon will be removed from the atmosphere, and 50,000 forest acres will be restored. The carbon offsets produced will go towards Amazon’s emissions.

Once additional investments are made, these projects can impact over 40,000 farmers, sparking socio-economic development worldwide. They can also help remove additional carbon from the atmosphere through agroforestry, restoration, eco-friendly fuels, and more.

The Pope, Archbishop, and Orthodox Leader went on to say that “Extreme weather and natural disasters reveal afresh to us with great force and at great human cost that climate change is not only a future challenge, but an immediate and urgent matter of survival.”

Carbon markets may very well be the solution these leaders, and the world, are looking for.

Amazon Rolls Out Rainforest Carbon Offset Project

Amazon has announced a carbon removal project in the Brazilian Rainforest in partnership with The Nature Conservancy (TNC). The project will help 3,000 small farmers produce sustainable agriculture through reforestation and regenerative agroforestry.

Known as The Agroforestry and Restoration Accelerator, Amazon and TNC anticipate it will remove up to 10 million metric tons of carbon from the atmosphere through 2050, which will help offset Amazon emissions.

The Pará state has been selected as the project’s location. It is home to 9% of the world’s tropical forest, which at 40%, has experienced the highest loss rate in Brazil.

Amazon’s funds will provide direct technical assistance to farmers. At the same time, TNC and other environmental nonprofits will support farmers on the ground. They hope to restore 50,000 acres. Small farmers will also learn how to diversify production and reach new markets to advance economic development.

Amazon, a co-founder, and signatory of the Climate Pledge is committed to reaching net-zero emissions by 2040. To do so, they are focused on improving the carbon credit market, and this project is a means to do just that.

By improving the infrastructure related to carbon credits, Amazon believes it can drive the carbon market further as a quantifiable, ongoing, and socially beneficial investment.  They plan to start through satellite imagery, advanced algorithms, and additional supervision.

Right now, the global carbon market is poised to reach $22T by 2050.

Senior Scientist at Amazon James Mulligan told Mongabay that Amazon believes there are “…more than 40,000 farmers who could benefit from a program like this in the region, and that would take a significant investment. We will set up the basic structure of the project and set up the program to scale. In order to scale, it needs additional investments which could come from different sources.”

As such, the collaborative partnership between Amazon and TNC is only the beginning. The announcement of this project is a win for Amazon, NGOs, farmers, investors, and quite frankly, the global carbon market.

Global Shipping Shakeup

The International Chamber of Shipping backed plans for a global surcharge on carbon emissions to fund the shift towards climate-friendly fuels. Their plan, which will be proposed to the United Nations, requires all international vessels of a specific size to pay per metric ton of carbon they emit.

The proposal has been well received by environmental groups and the International Maritime Organization, a U.N. body. If this surcharge passes, it will impact over 80% of the world’s merchant fleet. As of now, a price has not been set.

Director of Global Transportation at the Environmental Defense Fund, Aoife O’Leary, said, “We will know they are serious about real progress when they embrace a level of ambition consistent with what climate-vulnerable island nations have already proposed.”

Two nations with large shipping fleets and vulnerable territories (The Marshall Islands and The Solomon Islands) have suggested the surcharge starts at $100 per ton.

The Secretary-General of International Chamber of Shipping, Guy Platten, said, “This proposal sets out how to practically create a market-based measure for the global shipping industry, to quickly move towards an effective price. Rather than make guesses for PR purposes, we want to come to a number that will decarbonize the sector without disenfranchising huge proportions of the developing world on the way.”

Currently, the shipping industry accounts for nearly 3% of greenhouse gas emissions. That percentage is expected to increase over the next several years.

The International Chamber of Shipping aims to invest the money from this surcharge into a climate fund that would subsidize clean fuel alternatives. It is important to note that they oppose piecemeal regional measures, such as the current tariff being discussed within the EU.

Whether this global surcharge or the regional one being proposed by the EU is enacted, it is safe to say there is a drive for change. With these proposals on the table, and the global carbon offsetting industry expected to hit $22T by 2050, a net-zero future seems possible.

Getting a Handle on the Carbon Credit Opportunity

It’s not the first country you might think of when carbon credits come to mind. Instead, the Democratic Republic of Congo is a country rich in natural resources such as vital materials for the burgeoning battery industry.

A specialist conservation group is rolling out a multi-million dollar project to conserve millions of hectares of rainforest. Over the next 30 years, the Bonobo Peace Forest project has the potential to remove, and avoid the emission of, hundreds of millions of tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e).

Thousands of miles away, just off the coast of Mexico, lies a unique ecosystem of mangroves covering 22,000 hectares in the gorgeous Magdalena Bay. Mangroves store up to 1000% more carbon than terrestrial forests and another specialist conservation team is rolling out a multi-million dollar plan to reduce estimated emissions by 26 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) over 30 years.

These projects have two things in common:

  • They both received their funding from the same publicly traded corporation, and
  • They are both part of the rapidly growing carbon credits industry. Indeed, once they’re up and running they will start generating credits, year-after-year, for sale on the carbon credit markets worldwide.

The Two Main Carbon Markets: Compliance and Voluntary

Carbon credits represent a fascinating, rapidly growing sector which is split into two very different parts: the compliance markets and the voluntary markets.

Compliance markets, aka the Regulated Markets, are government-run, emission trading systems (ETS) that require all companies in certain industries to offset their emissions with carbon credits. The markets are designed as cap-and-trade and last year the combined total value of these markets topped US$261 billion. They are also very hard to get into if you happen to be a retail investor.

The voluntary markets hold the most promise for investors. They are the corporate world’s answer to the lack of a universal, government-run carbon credit system. If, like most companies, your industry is part of the compliance markets, the chances are you will eventually find yourself purchasing carbon credits in order to reach net zero.

  • Before we get too far ahead, let’s take a quick step back to understand the voluntary market in more detail.

Understanding Voluntary Carbon Markets

Whatever your personal thoughts on the matter, global decarbonization is gaining pace fast. Pressure from governments, pressure from consumers, pressure from investors… it’s all forcing companies to implement climate strategies, with carbon reduction front and centre.

The process of carbon reduction is straightforward but time consuming. Companies hire a specialist to evaluate their carbon footprint, analyze their business model and operations. The company can then plan and roll out whatever changes are required to cut their carbon footprint.

However, businesses are quickly discovering that it’s almost impossible for most of them to reach net zero carbon solely through operational changes and improvements. Some can’t even come close.

This is where the voluntary carbon credit markets come in.

  • Companies can buy carbon credits each year each to offset their remaining carbon footprint. 1 credit for every 1 metric tonne of carbon the company is responsible for.

And they need to do this each year if they want to stay carbon neutral. Unless, of course, they can somehow reach the net zero finish line by changing the way they do business.

  • So where do these carbon credits come from?
  • Who issues them?
  • Are these credits not simply giving companies an easy way out when they should be making those critical efficiencies?

How Carbon Credits Get Verified

Behind every carbon credit is a project designed from the ground up to avoid and/or reduce carbon emissions. They are run by teams that specialize in carbon offsetting. And those teams need to be at the top of their game because credits are issued by one of the big carbon credit verification agencies.

After, that is, every aspect of the project has been investigated and verified by the agency.

Once verified, credits are generated on a yearly basis and registered (including type and date) with the verification registry, and can then be purchased.

The quality and vintage of credits matter because they impact the quality and therefore the value of the project… a lot.

Knowing that the money they spend on credits is directly helping decarbonization is giving corporations the confidence to enter the carbon credits market. In turn, knowing they have a powerful carbon reduction tool at their disposal increases their confidence in making net zero pledges.

And they are, in droves.

Big business in leading the way with the number of corporations making net zero carbon pledges tripling to over 1,600 in the last 24 months.

This positive trend is backed by major investment funds aggressively pressuring for action. This includes some serious collective action like the Zero Asset Managers Initiative, which has signed up 128 asset management companies that manage a combined US$43 trillion in assets.

The Size of the Voluntary Carbon Market

The value of the voluntary carbon markets has started growing swiftly, reaching US$320 million in 2019. This is a fraction of its potential, however…

Analyst firm, McKinsey & Company, has stepped forward with growth forecasts of 15x by 2030, which would put the market value at US$50+ billion. And that same report predicts 100x growth by 2050.

Now, the voluntary markets have not been without their challenges. Having been in existence less than 20 years, it has taken some time to reach the level of maturity required for corporations to consider them a viable option.

“Cheap” Credits

The main culprit was verification standards that varied wildly between the agencies. As a result, some early projects received approvals that perhaps should have been withheld or had credit calculations that were too generous for the project in question. As a result, cheap, poor-quality credits were released onto the market in large quantities.

In recent years, however, increasingly strict verification standards have come into play thanks to new technology and a better understanding of the science and processes involved. These tougher standards have proven to be a boon, ensuring that only dedicated, seasoned organizations can successfully undertake a new offset project and bring new credits to the market. In turn, this has increased confidence among the growing pool of potential buyers.

Standards will continue to evolve. In time, the industry may even reach a point of having globally accepted framework accepted by every verification agency. For now, however, the issue is not the quality of standards, nor the demand for credits. Instead, it’s supply of credits from new, high end carbon offset projects.

From being cash poor, the carbon offset industry now has corporate buyers lining up, eager for the sort of projects that will not only help them across the net zero finish line but will also enable them to promote their involvement with whatever additional benefits each project brings – whether it’s a boost to the local economy, protection of an endangered species, etc.

It’s a startling change of pace even for the most successful carbon offset teams and it will be some time before the cash pipeline delivers increased return flow of high-quality credits. While the industry waits for supply of premium credits to catch up, it will increase upwards pressure on prices.

Where Does All This Leave Investors?

Trying to invest directly in a carbon offset project is generally going to require a lot of industry knowledge and a lot of leg work. Even then, you’ll likely be investing in a private company and shouldering all of the risk that comes with it.

You can purchase carbon credits through one of the verification agencies but as I’ve already mentioned quality and vintage matter so you will need to do a lot of leg work to get it right.

The remain avenues are investment vehicles such as ETFs and publicly traded companies. For the latter, the only one currently on the market is Carbon Streaming Corp., which listed earlier this year on Canada’s NEO exchange ($NETZ). Judging from Carbon Streaming’s successful financings, I doubt it will be long before we see other public companies with carbon credit offerings.

Keep a close eye on the voluntary carbon credit markets. It’s going to be an exciting ride and when more opportunities open up, they will do so fast.

Anthony Milewski

Mr. Anthony Milewski has spent his career in various aspects of the capital markets, including as a company director, advisor, founder and investor.  In particular, he has been active in the commodities related to decarbonization and the energy transition, including nickel, cobalt, copper and carbon credits. Anthony has served on the London Metals Exchange Cobalt Committee, which includes representatives from the largest mining and commodities companies globally, to represent the interests of the industry to the board of directors the LME.