New Blockchain Carbon Credit Marketplace to be Built by Cambridge University

Cambridge University is building a new blockchain carbon credit marketplace to preserve biodiversity. The program, called Cambridge Centre for Carbon Credits (otherwise known as 4C), will be run by computer scientists and conservation scientists, focusing on reforestation projects. The marketplace will be built using Tezos blockchain.

What is a carbon credit?

Carbon credits are traded on a platform – such as a carbon credit marketplace – to help offset carbon emissions. So, for every (one) carbon credit purchased, one metric ton of carbon is “offset” from the atmosphere through an environmental project.

Many countries and companies have been turning to the carbon credit industry to remain environmentally friendly as they work to achieve net-zero emissions. Keep in mind that net-zero isn’t possible for many industries since the technology doesn’t exist yet. So, carbon credits can help them meet new regulations.

Why did Cambridge choose Tezos?

According to Dr. Anil Madhavapeddy, an Associate Professor of Computer Science at Cambridge, Tezos was selected because the cryptocurrency is available on exchanges across the globe.

“We have to make sure that any schemes we fund can be supported over the course of decades, and Tezos is unique among blockchains in that it supports a built-in self-amending mechanism via distributed governance,” said Madhavapeddy.

“This means that the technology we choose will not be left behind, but it will continue to evolve and grow with the needs of the transactions happening with the network, which as I mentioned before, I hope will dramatically increase as the size of the voluntary carbon officer market increases over the next decade.”

What does this mean for the carbon credit industry?

Madhavapeddy went on to say that trust was crucial for ensuring that the marketplace succeeded so that “purchasers of carbon credits can confidently and directly fund trusted nature-based projects.”

With a new global standard set at COP26 and expanded interest in the worldwide carbon marketplace, efforts such as this demonstrate the integral role carbon credits play in the fight against climate change. As the industry becomes more transparent – alleviating some critic concerns – the market is only expected to grow.

The global carbon market is expected to be valued at $100 billion by 2030– up from just $300 million in 2018.

COP26: Global Carbon Market Deal Reached

Leaders at COP26 have reached a deal to standardize the international carbon trading market. Some estimate that the new UN-supervised marketplace could be worth as much as $100 billion.

What is the carbon marketplace?

The carbon marketplace is where carbon credits are purchased to offset emissions through environmental projects (such as reforestation). One carbon credit equals one metric ton of carbon.

Companies use offsets when they do not have the technology needed to reduce emissions. This way, they can still operate in an environmentally friendly way while working to achieve net-zero.

Now, with a global standard in place, many expect the carbon marketplace to expand rapidly. It has boomed this year alone, reaching $1 billion (up from $300 million in 2018).

Experts predict the global carbon market could reach $22 trillion by 2050.

How will the global carbon trading market work?

There are two parts to this new agreement:

• The creation of a central system that will be open to public and private sectors; and,
• A separate, bilateral system that will allow countries to trade credits.

While some critics feel the carbon credits offered will be for low-quality environmental projects – Dirk Forrister, Chief Executive of the International Emissions Trading Association, said the outcome was “solid and ambitious,” leaving it up to the private sector to “channel green investment using these new market structures and accelerate the race to net zero.”

Why is this new system an improvement?

COP26 decision creates a global approach to standards. It will be the first-time nations have a united standard to go by – which is a significant win.

• It can help make sure identical emissions reductions aren’t claimed by numerous countries or organizations.
• Countries can now ensure that their deals are subject to the same standards across the globe.
• Companies will have a more difficult time fudging their green credentials through imported credits.

“Article 6 provides the rules necessary for a robust, transparent, and accountable carbon market,” said Kelley Kozier, Vice President for Global Climate at the Environmental Defense Fund and a former negotiator.

In addition to an improved credit marketplace, at COP26, over 450 financial institutions – representing 45 different counties, with nearly $130 trillion in assets – committed to investing green.

Progress is being made.

COP 26 – Markets Wait For No One

NO DEAL! The clock is ticking on COP 26, and there’s no end in sight for the Article 6 agreements.

No rules – yet – for an expanded, global carbon trading market.

The summit didn’t officially end until Friday afternoon, and there’s always the chance of some overtime into the weekend.

An initial draft of an agreement is already making the rounds . . . but there’s something missing.

What about Article 6?

As with the previous Conferences of the Parties, agreeing on a framework for an international carbon trading market has proven more than a little thorny.

The holdup, as always, comes down to finances and figuring out what counts as a carbon offset.

Resolve those questions, the thinking goes, and regulators could potentially unleash a global market already worth millions of dollars per year.

The odd thing?

The markets aren’t waiting.

The very idea of regulators controlling an emerging market is ridiculous and ignores how markets typically work. Ahead of any final decision by the COP 26 negotiators, carbon credit prices are surging.

Australia notched a new high, even as the justice minister of Tuvalu gave an impassioned address to the COP.

Giving an address while knee-deep in the rising seas was a poignant touch, but there’s no guarantee the delegates at COP 26 heard him.

But the markets are already listening.

To live up to their potential, carbon offset prices need to continue to increase dramatically.

Most experts agree that prices need to be close to $150 per metric tonne in order to push companies to make the necessary changes. Is that far-fetched?

Evergrow just scored a 7-million-dollar seed round, leading the way for a growing wave of climate tech companies.

The California offset market is up 384% year-over-year. New initiatives are launching even as the negotiators struggle over minute details of the new regulations.

Business as usual for the COP, which failed to settle on a framework at the last two conferences in Madrid and Katowice.

Maybe the negotiators will pull through, and COP 26 will end in triumph, with a long-overdue framework for an international market.

There have been a number of surprises already, from China and the US agreeing on an emissions deal, to Brazil showing some willingness to negotiate on the issue of Kyoto-era credits.

But in the meantime, markets aren’t waiting. The VCM continues to grow, even as global warming pushes sea levels higher.

In other words, it’s also business as usual for the VCM.

Markets find a way, even when governments don’t.

COP 26 might have to go into overtime to strike a deal and the VCM is just beginning.

$7M Seed Round Raised by Evergrow

Evergrow has raised a $7M seed round. As one of the world’s first carbon offtake company, Evergrow’s goal is to provide offtake contracts and financing for projects that avoid, capture, or remove carbon emissions.

This seed round, which was co-led by Rodd Fubini at XYZ and Abe Yokell Congruent, will only strengthen Evergrow’s mission as they look to reach their goal of permanently avoiding or removing 1 billion tons of carbon by 2030. They hope to scale to 1 billion tons per year shortly after that.

According to Evergrow’s Co-Founder and CEO, James Richards, “It’s no secret that we urgently need to decarbonize our economy and remove tens of billions of tons of carbon emissions from the atmosphere to combat and reverse climate change.

This will require the deployment of trillions of dollars worth of new infrastructure projects, from clean power plants to alternative fuel refineries to direct air capture facilities and more. The faster we build these projects, the better we will fare in our fight against climate change.”

Many critics feel that the carbon market needs improvement since the lack of standards misrepresents credit quality. Though these concerns are valid, the industry is changing (and for the better).

The carbon market is becoming far more transparent than it has ever been. Plus, there have been talks of enacting a global standard for verifications for quite some time.

Evergrow plans to use their technology, data, and finance to deliver high-quality offtake contracts for carbon commodities. This way, they can pay people to reduce and remove carbon emissions while monetizing their carbon commodities. Richards hopes this will unlock additional financing for carbon reduction and help transition the globe into carbon neutrality.

The round included funds from First Round Capital, Garuda Ventures, Skyview Ventures, My Climate Journey, Zach Perrett (CEO, Plaid), Max Mullen (Co-founder, Instacart), Justin Kan (Co-founder, Twitch), Peter Reinhardt (CEO, Charm Industrial), Maddie Hall (CEO, Living Carbon), Michael Tanenbaum (CFO, Brex), Erica Dorfman (SVP Capital Markets, Brex), Karen Karniol-Tambour (Co-CIO for Sustainability, Bridgewater Associates), and others.

The voluntary carbon market is expected to be valued at $100 billion by 2030 – up from $300 million in 2018.

Richards went on to say that Evergrow is “assembling the world’s best team in climate technology and finance. The climate crisis is an existential threat to all of us, and we’re betting on humanity to win.”

London Stock Exchange Goal: Transparency Concerning Carbon

The London Stock Exchange has a new market to scale funding for projects that reduce carbon emissions. The goal is to make funding more transparent, which should help bring the industry to scale – a significant step forward for the carbon credit industry.

The voluntary carbon market is an exchange that companies use to offset their carbon emissions. One metric ton of carbon is “offset” from the atmosphere through an environmental project for every carbon credit purchased.

Companies use this method to offset their carbon emissions (especially when the technology isn’t available yet to remove emissions altogether).  The industry has boomed this past year as governments and companies alike look to meet Paris Agreement standards.

According to LSE, though the voluntary carbon market has great promise, it “remains small and fragmented and as such it lacks the market infrastructure and access to institutional investors that will truly enable it to scale.”

In an interview with CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe,” LSE CEO Julia Hoggett said, “One of the challenges we’ve had in this market is that it has been … less transparent and less visible to everybody in terms of participants and how the [climate change mitigation] projects are managed.”

By raising the profile of the public listed fud market, the LSA can enhance the disclosures and visibility and increase the capital. This will make the voluntary carbon market more visible and accessible.

At COP26, British Finance Minister Sunak said that the UK will expect financial firms to publish their climate change mitigation plans by 2023.

LSE’s statement went on to say, “We anticipate that corporates and other organizations with long-term needs for carbon credits will become investors, using the carbon credits delivered by these vehicles – which may be issued as an alternative or additional dividend – to meet a portion of their offset need.”

The global carbon market is expected to reach $100 billion by 2030. Some experts believe it is on track to reach $22 trillion by 2050.

John Kerry Believes COP26 Negotiations Will Result in Deal on Carbon-Trading Rules

After more than six years of negotiations, John Kerry believes world leaders are ready to reach a deal on carbon-trading rules.

This would be a massive victory for the offset market and be a significant victory for climate diplomacy.

The carbon credit industry has grown exponentially over the past year as companies and governments look for ways to offset their carbon emissions.

However popular, critics feel that the industry lacks the regulatory standards needed to be effective. If world leaders can agree, the industry would become far more transparent – alleviating many concerns.

The carbon trading industry can offset emissions, improve the environment, and spark economic development in areas that need it most. Combined with innovative technology and additional regulations, the global carbon marketplace is a driving force in the fight against climate change – which is why an international standard is so important.

In addition to carbon trading rules, Kerry has been negotiating with Russia and China to reduce their methane gas emission. More than 105 countries have signed up to reduce their methane emissions by 30%. Though China hasn’t signed on, Kerry feels that the country has shown a commitment to doing more than they have been.

The US has set a goal to decarbonize the power sector by 2035 and eliminate coal plants by 2030.

If carbon trading rules are implemented globally, the carbon credit industry will only continue to grow. Right now, the voluntary carbon market is on track to reach $100 billion by 2030 (up from $300 million in 2018). Some experts believe it could be valued at $22 trillion by 2050.

Regarding COP26, Kerry was quoted as saying, ““We have to have a measurement of ambition. This is a long journey and now really is the test of whether we can get there.”

Carbon Market Talks Ongoing at COP26

Discussions about international carbon markets have faced some challenges at COP26. The US and EU expressed concerns about the proposed transaction tax on carbon trading. Proceeds of this tax would support nations that are the most impacted by climate change.

It is reported that US officials feel such a plan is not feasible. They are concerned that the federal government will end up having to foot the bill for such taxes.

While all nations can agree that the global offset market needs to become more transparent and that verification processes (and standards) should improve, there are two competing thoughts:

1.) Create a bilateral carbon credit exchange that could help countries meet national targets.
2.) Create a global marketplace for trading offsets.

Norway and Singapore seem to be trying to get nations on board with merging the two.

About the discussions, Norwegian Climate and Environment Minister Espen Barth Eide was quoted as saying that “It’s difficult.” Though there is “a can-do mood.”

The global carbon market is currently valued at $100 billion – up from just $300 million in 2018. Some project it could reach $22 trillion by 2050.

While the carbon market can help reduce emissions, improve the environment, and spark economies across the globe, critics feel that the industry does little to encourage net-zero emissions.

World leaders disagree.

Yes, the industry has its flaws, but carbon offsets are integral in the fight against climate change. If they weren’t, the heavy focus on the offset industry at COP26 wouldn’t be taking place.

Contrary to what critics may say, offsets were never designed to be the only way to combat climate change. However, when used alongside technological advances, and increased regulation, they play a significant role.

It will be an environmental win if nations can figure out how to make the global carbon market work for all.  Leaders have until Friday.

Xpansiv Acquires SRECTrade – Solar Renewable Energy

Global ESG commodities leader Xpansiv, Ltd. has announced the acquisition of SRECTrade, Inc., a rapidly expanding environmental commodity management and transaction platform.

SRECTrade (Solar Renewable Energy Certificates)

SRECTrade currently has more than 50,000 commercial, institutional, and retail customers. They are the leading aggregator of Solar Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs), focusing on clean transportation and Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) markets.

“Together, SRECTrade and Xpansiv will continue to scale our REC trading and platform businesses, which will deliver tremendous value and technological benefits to customers and markets alike,” said Nathan Rockliff, Chief Strategy Officer at Xpansiv.

John Melby, Xpansiv President, and COO said that he believes this partnership will position Xpansiv to “bring our core benefits—same-day settlement, no contracting, no counterparty risk, and price transparency—to new markets, including clean transportation. This transaction is a key element of our plan to expand operations through both acquisitions and organic growth.”

This year, trading on Xpansiv’s platform surpassed $100 million. They acquired HVB Markets and Iguanadata, and even raised $100 million in pre-IPO capital.

SRECTrade CEO Steven Eisenberg said, “Through this combination, we will further accelerate growth across our existing markets and apply our expertise to Xpansiv’s innovative ESG-inclusive commodity platform.”

“We are excited to join Xpansiv’s impressive team to service our clients during this critical period of growth. Merging our people, platforms, and purpose-driven approaches will advance our joint mission to promote the adoption of clean energy and move toward a net-zero future.”

There are many reasons why the carbon credit industry has grown, including the need to meet new regulations by offsetting carbon and a desire to boost socio-economic development. Right now, the voluntary carbon marketplace is expected to reach $100 billion by 2030. Experts believe it will be valued at $22 trillion by 2050.

Fossil Fuel Shipments Being Offset Through Carbon Credits

According to Trove Research, 5% of all carbon credits purchased this year were used to offset fossil fuel shipments – an increase from years past.

Trove found a “surge in the use of carbon credits for hydrocarbon products,” often marketed as being “carbon neutral.” 4.6 million units were used to offset hydrocarbon shipments in 2021, compared with 1.2 million in 2020.

Companies using offsets include Royal Dutch Shell, BP, and Total.

The carbon credit industry has expanded this past year. In 2018 it was valued at $300 million. It is now on track to reach $100 billion by 2030. Some experts believe it could even reach $22 trillion by 2050.

If you aren’t familiar with carbon credits, the premise is quite simple. Every carbon credit represents one metric ton of carbon. That metric ton of carbon is then “offset” through an environmental project that will remove one ton of carbon from the atmosphere through an environmental project, such as reforestation.

Some critics feel that while the carbon credit industry makes many promises, it fails to deliver.

Jonathan Crook of Carbon Market Watch said that offsets are “nothing more than a desperate and shameless attempt by oil and gas majors to keep business-as-usual activities and hoodwink the public.”

While some concerns are fair – such as the need for better oversight and verification – the offset industry is improving. High-quality offsets are being generated, and the tools used to measure them are advancing. Governments and companies alike recognize their value, which is a significant reason behind the industry’s growth.

When used in conjunction with technological advances and increased regulation, carbon offsets play an important role in the fight against climate change.

Currently, the volume of Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) shipped with a carbon-neutral claim is about 0.4% worldwide.

Battle of the Offsets: The Emerging Fight at COP 26

This week, a war was brewing along the riverfront in Glasgow, Scotland.

That’s nothing new. The Scottish are no strangers to a brawl, and the River Clyde has seen more than a few fights in its day.

But this fight is just a bit different.

On one side – you have Greta Thunberg, the Rainbow Warrior, Greenpeace, and a host of environmental activists.

On the other side –  you’ll find Mark Carney (former head of the Bank of England), his Taskforce on Scaling Voluntary Carbon Markets (TSVCM), and the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ), among others.

It’s big business versus plucky activists – Or is it?

Disagree to agree

Both sides are only in Glasgow in the first place because they know there’s a problem. The ongoing COP 26 (Conference of the Parties) is the agreed-upon follow-up to the Paris Agreements.

Most of the nations of the world are gathered there to discuss current progress in cutting CO2 emissions, national limits, and next steps.

Everyone agrees that more must be done to fight climate change. But when it comes to actually DOING something, the disagreements start.

Greta Thunberg and Jennifer Morgan, of Greenpeace, have called the emphasis on carbon offsets at COP 26 “greenwashing.” Any company that doesn’t immediately stop using fossil fuels – no matter what impact that has on the company – risks being branded as a climate change denier.

Mark Carney emphasized that the business approach of buying carbon offsets holds the potential to fuel a greener approach, harvesting billions of dollars that could go towards green investments.

The GFANZ group alone could generate up to $1 trillion towards net-zero goals, at least in part by purchasing carbon offsets.

The bickering has increased over the past few days as the stakes have grown even higher.

The Article 6 guidelines that (may) be drawn up in Glasgow will need to address a number of issues, including:

  • Double-counting offsets
  • Pre-Paris offsets
  • Net-zero and fossil fuels

The stakes are big enough that everyone wants to be involved.

Russia wants the conference to declare nuclear power as a form of green energy, and to set clear guidelines for forestation offsets (they have about 20% of the world’s forests, after all).

Greenpeace wants the group to downplay offsets and ban new fossil fuel investment entirely.

The UK announced a carbon-to-clean energy pathway that would put them in a leading position among industrialized countries.

Everyone wants a piece of the Voluntary Carbon Markets pie.

Meanwhile, the world leaders took over 400 private jets to Scotland for the conference – which became a massive PR nightmare.

The CO2 emissions for that type of travel is not the best image you want going into a climate conference.

Their total emissions exceeded 300 tonnes for air travel alone – underscoring the pressing need for clear measures.

Average Emission per Kilometer of Travel

Time for Action – but what kind of action?

Both sides acknowledge the need for action, but what kind?

The activist side – see fossil fuel dependence as the primary issue of the day. Until that’s solved, why bother with offsets? That’s only greenwashing, through and through.

The investor side – acknowledges the fossil fuel issue but recognizes that offsets provide a vector for immediate action.

COP 26 can address the activists’ criticisms while also setting out a market framework to harness the power of offsets.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres used an opening statement to announce an expert panel to help assess the quality of carbon offsets. That’s a key first step, especially if followed by a clear framework for international offset trading.

The battle lines have been drawn.

The stakes are high and there is a lot of money on the table.

The GFANZ group has up to $130 Trillion of private capital committed to net zero.

And with nearly ⅓ of the world’s investment capital in the GFANZ group, now is the time to harness the power of the Voluntary Carbon Market.