London Stock Exchange Goal: Transparency Concerning Carbon

Carbon Credits
-
0
London Stock Exchange Goal: Transparency Concerning Carbon

The London Stock Exchange has a new market to scale funding for projects that reduce carbon emissions. The goal is to make funding more transparent, which should help bring the industry to scale – a significant step forward for the carbon credit industry.

The voluntary carbon market is an exchange that companies use to offset their carbon emissions. One metric ton of carbon is “offset” from the atmosphere through an environmental project for every carbon credit purchased.

Companies use this method to offset their carbon emissions (especially when the technology isn’t available yet to remove emissions altogether).  The industry has boomed this past year as governments and companies alike look to meet Paris Agreement standards.

According to LSE, though the voluntary carbon market has great promise, it “remains small and fragmented and as such it lacks the market infrastructure and access to institutional investors that will truly enable it to scale.”

In an interview with CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe,” LSE CEO Julia Hoggett said, “One of the challenges we’ve had in this market is that it has been … less transparent and less visible to everybody in terms of participants and how the [climate change mitigation] projects are managed.”

By raising the profile of the public listed fud market, the LSA can enhance the disclosures and visibility and increase the capital. This will make the voluntary carbon market more visible and accessible.

At COP26, British Finance Minister Sunak said that the UK will expect financial firms to publish their climate change mitigation plans by 2023.

LSE’s statement went on to say, “We anticipate that corporates and other organizations with long-term needs for carbon credits will become investors, using the carbon credits delivered by these vehicles – which may be issued as an alternative or additional dividend – to meet a portion of their offset need.”

The global carbon market is expected to reach $100 billion by 2030. Some experts believe it is on track to reach $22 trillion by 2050.

John Kerry Believes COP26 Negotiations Will Result in Deal on Carbon-Trading Rules

Carbon Credits
-
0
John Kerry Believes COP26 Negotiations Will Result in Deal on Carbon-Trading Rules

After more than six years of negotiations, John Kerry believes world leaders are ready to reach a deal on carbon-trading rules.

This would be a massive victory for the offset market and be a significant victory for climate diplomacy.

The carbon credit industry has grown exponentially over the past year as companies and governments look for ways to offset their carbon emissions.

However popular, critics feel that the industry lacks the regulatory standards needed to be effective. If world leaders can agree, the industry would become far more transparent – alleviating many concerns.

The carbon trading industry can offset emissions, improve the environment, and spark economic development in areas that need it most. Combined with innovative technology and additional regulations, the global carbon marketplace is a driving force in the fight against climate change – which is why an international standard is so important.

In addition to carbon trading rules, Kerry has been negotiating with Russia and China to reduce their methane gas emission. More than 105 countries have signed up to reduce their methane emissions by 30%. Though China hasn’t signed on, Kerry feels that the country has shown a commitment to doing more than they have been.

The US has set a goal to decarbonize the power sector by 2035 and eliminate coal plants by 2030.

If carbon trading rules are implemented globally, the carbon credit industry will only continue to grow. Right now, the voluntary carbon market is on track to reach $100 billion by 2030 (up from $300 million in 2018). Some experts believe it could be valued at $22 trillion by 2050.

Regarding COP26, Kerry was quoted as saying, ““We have to have a measurement of ambition. This is a long journey and now really is the test of whether we can get there.”

Carbon Market Talks Ongoing at COP26

Carbon Credits
-
0
Carbon Market Talks Ongoing at COP26

Discussions about international carbon markets have faced some challenges at COP26. The US and EU expressed concerns about the proposed transaction tax on carbon trading. Proceeds of this tax would support nations that are the most impacted by climate change.

It is reported that US officials feel such a plan is not feasible. They are concerned that the federal government will end up having to foot the bill for such taxes.

While all nations can agree that the global offset market needs to become more transparent and that verification processes (and standards) should improve, there are two competing thoughts:

1.) Create a bilateral carbon credit exchange that could help countries meet national targets.
2.) Create a global marketplace for trading offsets.

Norway and Singapore seem to be trying to get nations on board with merging the two.

About the discussions, Norwegian Climate and Environment Minister Espen Barth Eide was quoted as saying that “It’s difficult.” Though there is “a can-do mood.”

The global carbon market is currently valued at $100 billion – up from just $300 million in 2018. Some project it could reach $22 trillion by 2050.

While the carbon market can help reduce emissions, improve the environment, and spark economies across the globe, critics feel that the industry does little to encourage net-zero emissions.

World leaders disagree.

Yes, the industry has its flaws, but carbon offsets are integral in the fight against climate change. If they weren’t, the heavy focus on the offset industry at COP26 wouldn’t be taking place.

Contrary to what critics may say, offsets were never designed to be the only way to combat climate change. However, when used alongside technological advances, and increased regulation, they play a significant role.

It will be an environmental win if nations can figure out how to make the global carbon market work for all.  Leaders have until Friday.

Xpansiv Acquires SRECTrade – Solar Renewable Energy

Carbon Credits
-
0
Xpansiv Acquires SRECTrade – Solar Renewable Energy

Global ESG commodities leader Xpansiv, Ltd. has announced the acquisition of SRECTrade, Inc., a rapidly expanding environmental commodity management and transaction platform.

SRECTrade (Solar Renewable Energy Certificates)

SRECTrade currently has more than 50,000 commercial, institutional, and retail customers. They are the leading aggregator of Solar Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs), focusing on clean transportation and Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) markets.

“Together, SRECTrade and Xpansiv will continue to scale our REC trading and platform businesses, which will deliver tremendous value and technological benefits to customers and markets alike,” said Nathan Rockliff, Chief Strategy Officer at Xpansiv.

John Melby, Xpansiv President, and COO said that he believes this partnership will position Xpansiv to “bring our core benefits—same-day settlement, no contracting, no counterparty risk, and price transparency—to new markets, including clean transportation. This transaction is a key element of our plan to expand operations through both acquisitions and organic growth.”

This year, trading on Xpansiv’s platform surpassed $100 million. They acquired HVB Markets and Iguanadata, and even raised $100 million in pre-IPO capital.

SRECTrade CEO Steven Eisenberg said, “Through this combination, we will further accelerate growth across our existing markets and apply our expertise to Xpansiv’s innovative ESG-inclusive commodity platform.”

“We are excited to join Xpansiv’s impressive team to service our clients during this critical period of growth. Merging our people, platforms, and purpose-driven approaches will advance our joint mission to promote the adoption of clean energy and move toward a net-zero future.”

There are many reasons why the carbon credit industry has grown, including the need to meet new regulations by offsetting carbon and a desire to boost socio-economic development. Right now, the voluntary carbon marketplace is expected to reach $100 billion by 2030. Experts believe it will be valued at $22 trillion by 2050.

Fossil Fuel Shipments Being Offset Through Carbon Credits

Carbon Credits
-
0
Fossil Fuel Shipments Being Offset Through Carbon Credits

According to Trove Research, 5% of all carbon credits purchased this year were used to offset fossil fuel shipments – an increase from years past.

Trove found a “surge in the use of carbon credits for hydrocarbon products,” often marketed as being “carbon neutral.” 4.6 million units were used to offset hydrocarbon shipments in 2021, compared with 1.2 million in 2020.

Companies using offsets include Royal Dutch Shell, BP, and Total.

The carbon credit industry has expanded this past year. In 2018 it was valued at $300 million. It is now on track to reach $100 billion by 2030. Some experts believe it could even reach $22 trillion by 2050.

If you aren’t familiar with carbon credits, the premise is quite simple. Every carbon credit represents one metric ton of carbon. That metric ton of carbon is then “offset” through an environmental project that will remove one ton of carbon from the atmosphere through an environmental project, such as reforestation.

Some critics feel that while the carbon credit industry makes many promises, it fails to deliver.

Jonathan Crook of Carbon Market Watch said that offsets are “nothing more than a desperate and shameless attempt by oil and gas majors to keep business-as-usual activities and hoodwink the public.”

While some concerns are fair – such as the need for better oversight and verification – the offset industry is improving. High-quality offsets are being generated, and the tools used to measure them are advancing. Governments and companies alike recognize their value, which is a significant reason behind the industry’s growth.

When used in conjunction with technological advances and increased regulation, carbon offsets play an important role in the fight against climate change.

Currently, the volume of Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) shipped with a carbon-neutral claim is about 0.4% worldwide.

Battle of the Offsets: The Emerging Fight at COP 26

Carbon Credits
-
0
Battle of the Offsets: The Emerging Fight at COP 26

This week, a war was brewing along the riverfront in Glasgow, Scotland.

That’s nothing new. The Scottish are no strangers to a brawl, and the River Clyde has seen more than a few fights in its day.

But this fight is just a bit different.

On one side – you have Greta Thunberg, the Rainbow Warrior, Greenpeace, and a host of environmental activists.

On the other side –  you’ll find Mark Carney (former head of the Bank of England), his Taskforce on Scaling Voluntary Carbon Markets (TSVCM), and the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ), among others.

It’s big business versus plucky activists – Or is it?

Disagree to agree

Both sides are only in Glasgow in the first place because they know there’s a problem. The ongoing COP 26 (Conference of the Parties) is the agreed-upon follow-up to the Paris Agreements.

Most of the nations of the world are gathered there to discuss current progress in cutting CO2 emissions, national limits, and next steps.

Everyone agrees that more must be done to fight climate change. But when it comes to actually DOING something, the disagreements start.

Greta Thunberg and Jennifer Morgan, of Greenpeace, have called the emphasis on carbon offsets at COP 26 “greenwashing.” Any company that doesn’t immediately stop using fossil fuels – no matter what impact that has on the company – risks being branded as a climate change denier.

Mark Carney emphasized that the business approach of buying carbon offsets holds the potential to fuel a greener approach, harvesting billions of dollars that could go towards green investments.

The GFANZ group alone could generate up to $1 trillion towards net-zero goals, at least in part by purchasing carbon offsets.

The bickering has increased over the past few days as the stakes have grown even higher.

The Article 6 guidelines that (may) be drawn up in Glasgow will need to address a number of issues, including:

  • Double-counting offsets
  • Pre-Paris offsets
  • Net-zero and fossil fuels

The stakes are big enough that everyone wants to be involved.

Russia wants the conference to declare nuclear power as a form of green energy, and to set clear guidelines for forestation offsets (they have about 20% of the world’s forests, after all).

Greenpeace wants the group to downplay offsets and ban new fossil fuel investment entirely.

The UK announced a carbon-to-clean energy pathway that would put them in a leading position among industrialized countries.

Everyone wants a piece of the Voluntary Carbon Markets pie.

Meanwhile, the world leaders took over 400 private jets to Scotland for the conference – which became a massive PR nightmare.

The CO2 emissions for that type of travel is not the best image you want going into a climate conference.

Their total emissions exceeded 300 tonnes for air travel alone – underscoring the pressing need for clear measures.

Average Emission per Kilometer of Travel

Time for Action – but what kind of action?

Both sides acknowledge the need for action, but what kind?

The activist side – see fossil fuel dependence as the primary issue of the day. Until that’s solved, why bother with offsets? That’s only greenwashing, through and through.

The investor side – acknowledges the fossil fuel issue but recognizes that offsets provide a vector for immediate action.

COP 26 can address the activists’ criticisms while also setting out a market framework to harness the power of offsets.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres used an opening statement to announce an expert panel to help assess the quality of carbon offsets. That’s a key first step, especially if followed by a clear framework for international offset trading.

The battle lines have been drawn.

The stakes are high and there is a lot of money on the table.

The GFANZ group has up to $130 Trillion of private capital committed to net zero.

And with nearly ⅓ of the world’s investment capital in the GFANZ group, now is the time to harness the power of the Voluntary Carbon Market.

Largest Investment Round Ever Made for Climate Tech SaaS Company

Carbon Credits
-
0
Largest Investment Round Ever Made for Climate Tech SaaS Company

Prelude Ventures and TPG’s The Rise Fund have raised a $101 million Series B investment for Persefoni.

It is the most significant investment round ever made for a Climate Tech SaaS company.

Persefoni’s is a leader in Software as a Service (Saas) for climate management and accounting. This approach enables companies worldwide to calculate and disclose their global carbon footprint at a fraction of the cost.

Some of the world’s largest private equity funds, banks, insurance companies, pensions, and endowment funds use Persefoni to calculate and disclose their emissions. Persefoni also works across the manufacturing, agriculture, energy, apparel, retail, software, and business services industries.

While there may be other data and software solutions out there – Persefoni’s methodology is consumer-friendly. Their expertise within global standards and regulations has made them a global leader.

“Persefoni is very much mission-aligned with Prelude, where our focus is on enabling a net-zero carbon emissions future,” says Victoria Beasley, Prelude General Partner, and Persefoni board member.

“Ever since our founding in 2013, we have been looking for a solution that meets the needs of enterprises that want to take ownership of their carbon footprint. I’ve evaluated more than two-dozen startups aimed at this problem, but none of them could match the Persefoni team’s conviction, market strategy, and long-term vision.”

Additional funding was raised through Clearvision Ventures, Parkway Ventures, Bain & Co., EDF Group through its corporate venture arm EDF Pulse Holding, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC), The Ferrante Group, Alumni Ventures Group, and New Valley Ventures. Existing investors include NGP Energy Technology Partners, Sallyport Investments, and strategic angels.

“As a global, low-carbon energy leader, our clients rely on us to point them to the best carbon management solutions in the market. The first step to being able to reduce a carbon footprint is to continuously measure and understand it, and there is no better technology than Persefoni’s platform for this purpose in the enterprise segment,” said Julien Villeret, Chief Innovation Officer at EDF Group.

More companies are looking for ways to measure their carbon footprint. In fact, the carbon credit industry has boomed this past year as businesses work to offset their emissions. Many believe this is due to standards set by the Paris Agreement and new COP26 objectives. So, Persefoni’s commitment to transparency can help achieve net-zero goals.

Persefoni plans to expand across 18 states in the US and eight countries.

US & EU Join Global Pledge to Cut Methane

Carbon Credits
-
0
US & EU Join Global Pledge to Cut Methane

The US and EU have announced a global partnership to cut methane emissions by 30% by 2030. Methane is responsible for one-third of global warming from human activity, which is why over 100 countries have joined in.

Though many environmentalists feel that focusing on CO2 is best (since CO2 stays in the atmosphere longer), methane impacts the atmosphere more intensely. In fact, it is 28-34 times as warming as CO2. And, over 20 years, methane is about 84 times as powerful per unit as carbon dioxide.

US President Joe Biden referred to methane gas as “one of the most potent greenhouse gases there is.”

EU Commission Chief Ursula von der Leyen told summit participants, “We cannot wait for 2050. We have to cut emissions fast.” She went on to say that removing methane is “one of the most effective things we can do to reduce near-term global warming.”

The Paris Agreement’s goals are to keep the global temperature from rising more than 1.5 degrees Celsius. Last August, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reported that methane was behind a 1-degree Celsius increase in the earth’s temperature already.

Most methane comes from natural resources, such as wetlands. However, a large percentage comes from human activity – including cattle and rice production, garbage dumps, and natural gas production and transport. Many believe fracking practices have a large part to play too.

Though this pledge covers countries that emit half of all methane emissions – some significant emitters are not a part of the ledge. These include Russia and China.

It is important to know that joining the pledge is voluntary, with no real repercussions if failing to meet guidelines. Regardless, many view this partnership as a step in the right direction.

Governments, and companies alike, have shown at COP26 a genuine desire to partner together to lower emissions. The boom within the carbon credit industry has shown this as well. Advances in technology increased regulations, and the offset industry all have a role in the fight against climate change.

If methane is cut by 30%, scientists believe it could prevent the earth’s temperature from increasing by .3 degrees Celsius by 2040.

World Leaders Look to Speed Up Affordable Clean Tech

Carbon Credits
-
0
World Leaders Look to Speed Up Affordable Clean Tech

At COP26, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced The Glasgow Breakthrough – a plan to deliver clean technology across the globe. The goal is to make clean tech affordable and accessible by 2030 through government and company partnerships. Over 40 world leaders have joined in, representing 70% of the world’s economy.

“By making clean technology the most affordable, accessible, and attractive choice, the default go-to in what are currently the most polluting sectors, we can cut emissions right around the world,” said Johnson.

The first five goals to reach by 2030 could create 20 million new jobs and add $16 trillion to the global economy. They include:

  • Renewable power to communities across the globe.
  • Improved food systems through climate-smart agriculture.
  • Creating clean technologies across aviation, aluminum, chemicals, concrete, direct air capture, shipping, steel, and trucking.
  • Support for clean energy transitions.

Funds to lower the cost of clean technology, maximize green hydrogen and direct capture markets, and increase sustainable aviation fuels.

Other areas of focus are zero-emission vehicles, near-zero steel, and renewable and low-carbon hydrogen.

According to Gonzalo Munoz and Nigel Topping – UN High-Level Climate Champions, “This is what the future of COP is all about – catalyzing an innovative ambition loop between political leadership and the dynamism of the private sector to drive towards a resilient, prosperous zero-carbon future.”

It isn’t surprising that world leaders and companies are joining forces. Their desire to lower emissions is the main reason behind the carbon credit industry boom. The carbon credit industry was valued at $300 million in 2018. It is now on track to reach $100 billion by 2030.

These partnerships are what is needed to reduce carbon emissions. And, with the world at ‘Code-Red’ levels, it is important that leaders act quickly.

Climate change impacts every one of us. But, as governments and private industry join to offset emissions, create new technologies, and increase regulation, net-zero goals feel within reach.

Johnson went on to say, ““The Glasgow Breakthroughs will turbocharge this forward so that by 2030 clean technologies can be enjoyed everywhere, not only reducing emissions but also creating more jobs and greater prosperity.”

If successful, The Glasgow Breakthrough has the potential to improve the environment and spark economic growth, globally – benefiting all.

Tax Credit Hike Proposed for US Carbon Capture & Sequestration Projects

Carbon Credits
-
0
Tax Credit Hike Proposed for US Carbon Capture & Sequestration Projects

US Congress may expand tax credits for carbon capture and sequestration projects. the goal is to help increase the use of green technology. However, some environmentalists are concerned that doing so will not stop industries from reducing their carbon emissions.

The proposal is currently listed within the Biden administration’s $1.75 trillion package. For every metric ton of carbon captured and stored, an $85 credit would be provided. Right now, industries are only offered $50 per credit.

President Joe Biden has said that his goal is to decarbonize the US by 2050. Carbon capture sequestration (CCS) is a way that the US can accomplish that. The process involves capturing carbon that is produced, then placing it deep underground so that it isn’t released into the air.

Right now, several CCS facilities in the US are no longer in service. According to the Global CCS Institute, only a dozen or so are operational.

Though many groups see the value of carbon capture and storage, some environmentalists aren’t so sure. They feel that the proposal, which requires 50%-75% of carbon to be captured, is far too low.

The Clean Air Task Force feels the credit hike would be beneficial since it can increase carbon capture 13 times over throughout the 2030s. According to CATF spokeswoman Lee Beck, “These provisions will not only enable decarbonization of domestic industries but can also multiply emissions reductions abroad.”

COP26 is taking place right now.

As leaders work to combat climate change, increased incentives for carbon capture and sequestration could serve as part of the solution. The voluntary carbon marketplace also has a role to play, as companies use credits to offset emissions.

Combine carbon capture and sequestration, offsetting, increased regulation, and advances in technology, and net-zero goals are within reach.

1...204205206...218Page 205 of 218