LATEST ARTICLES

Thacker Pass Is Being Built: Here Is Why That Is the Best News NILI Investors Have Heard All Year.

Disseminated on behalf of Surge Battery Metals.

Lithium Americas (LAC) has officially broken ground at Thacker Pass, Nevada. The project is advancing toward its first production target in 2028. LAC CEO Jonathan Evans said in the companyโ€™s news release that the project should be mechanically complete by the end of 2026. Commissioning will happen through 2027, with commercial production starting in 2028.

For investors watching Nevada clay lithium, this milestone is more than an update. Itโ€™s a market signal that could change the investment landscape.

De-Risking the Clay Lithium Category

For years, clay-based lithium has faced a single recurring objection: โ€œIt has never been done at a commercial scale.โ€ Unlike brine or hard-rock lithium, sedimentary clay deposits presented a technological and operational unknown. Investors and lenders were cautious, capital costs were higher, and early-stage projects struggled to secure financing.

Thacker Pass changes that narrative. Once LAC makes battery-grade lithium carbonate from sedimentary clay at a commercial scale, it reduces risks for the whole category. Projects in Nevada now have clear proof that clay-based lithium can be mined and processed effectively.

The historical precedent is instructive. In Chile’s Atacama region, the first brine lithium projects proved the chemistry and cost-effectiveness of large-scale lithium extraction. Later projects attracted capital more easily and on better terms. This created a ripple effect, speeding up the region’s lead in global lithium supply.

Thacker Pass is playing that same role for sedimentary clay. Its success is not just a win for LAC. It marks a key milestone for the whole Nevada clay lithium sector, including the Nevada North Lithium Project (NNLP) of Surge Battery Metals (TSX-V: NILI | OTCQX: NILIF).

Understanding the Technical Landscape

Thacker Pass Phase 1 has lithium levels of 1,500โ€“2,500 ppm. They plan to extract it using sulfuric acid leaching to create battery-grade lithium carbonate. The project is important both geographically and operationally.

It features a large pit, a big processing facility, and integrated infrastructure. This covers access roads, water supply management, and energy sources that meet Nevadaโ€™s rules.

Thacker Pass lithium mine project
Source: Lithium Americas

While Thacker Pass shows commercial viability, it is crucial to note that NNLP and Thacker Pass are not technically the same. NNLP employs a different beneficiation approach and reagent chemistry to optimize recovery.

NNLP: The Higher-Grade, Next-Generation Project

Thacker Pass shows clay lithium on a large scale. NNLP positions itself as the next evolution of this asset class, with clear geological advantages:

  • Grade: NNLP averages 3,010 ppm lithium, significantly higher than Thacker Pass Phase 1 material. Recent drilling results show that step-out drilling found a 31-meter intercept with 4,196 ppm lithium from surface. This gives NNLP a potential extraction advantage.
  • Strip Ratio: NNLPโ€™s 1.16:1 strip ratio is among the lowest in the sedimentary clay peer group. This indicates that it has favorable material movement requirements relative to ore recovered.
  • Operating Costs: NNLPโ€™s estimated OPEX is US$5,097/t LCE, lower than Thacker Pass guidance of ~US$6,200/t C1. It suggests that it has competitive economic positioning within the peer group.

Both projects produce battery-grade lithium carbonate using sulfuric acid leaching. However, each method is customized for the specific geology of the project. NNLP is not a copy of Thacker Pass. Rather, it is a next-generation clay project designed to leverage lessons learned while improving key parameters.

Surge lithium clay comparison

Moreover, infill drilling showed a steady, thick, high-grade core. It included intercepts like 116 meters at 3,752 ppm Li and 32 meters at 4,521 ppm Li. These results support future resource expansion. They also highlight the project’s scale, quality, and technical readiness as it prepares for a Pre-Feasibility Study.

Why Category De-Risking Matters for Investors

In emerging resource sectors, de-risking is often more valuable than the resource itself. Projects that validate a new extraction method or commodity unlock several market advantages:

  1. Lower financing risk: Investors are more willing to fund projects once proof of concept exists.
  2. Improved capital terms: Lending rates and equity expectations can improve when technology and economics are validated.
  3. Accelerated project development: Developers can move faster, reduce contingencies, and focus on optimization rather than proving viability.

Thacker Passโ€™s progress effectively removes the โ€œfirst-mover riskโ€ from sedimentary clay projects. NNLP has higher grades, near-surface mineralization, and competitive OPEX. Now, it can be assessed on its own merits, not on doubts about large-scale clay processing.

Strategic Significance in the U.S. Lithium Market

The timing of Thacker Passโ€™s construction and NNLPโ€™s development aligns with broader policy and market trends. Lithium is a critical input for electric vehicles, grid-scale storage, and advanced defense technologies. The U.S. government has emphasized domestic lithium production as a strategic priority.

In March 2025, President Trump signed an executive order called โ€œImmediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production.โ€ This order directs federal agencies to speed up permitting and support domestic projects. It also aims to lessen dependence on foreign supply chains for critical minerals.

Projects like Thacker Pass and NNLP benefit from this policy. They provide secure domestic sources that boost the lithium supply chain.

Nevada is central to this strategy. Its clay deposits are among the largest and best in the U.S. They provide a stable base for domestic lithium production, which supports electrification goals and helps reduce reliance on imports.

Thacker Passโ€™s progress also sends a signal beyond the Nevada clay sector. It demonstrates that investors and capital markets are willing to back sedimentary clay projects at scale. That validation reduces perceived risk for future projects. It also speeds up permitting and development timelines as well as strengthens valuation metrics.

NNLP, with its superior grade and shallower resource, stands to benefit disproportionately. It is no longer constrained by questions of category viability. It can now be evaluated based on its geological quality, operational efficiency, and potential returns.

NNLP’s advantages, combined with the category de-risking effect of Thacker Pass, position it as a next-generation investment opportunity in Nevadaโ€™s clay lithium space.

Looking Ahead: Domestic Lithiumโ€™s Role in Energy Transition

Lithium demand is set to grow rapidly as electric vehicles, battery storage, and renewable systems expand. Securing a high-quality, domestic supply is critical to maintaining U.S. leadership in clean energy technology.

lithium demand growth through 2035

Thacker Pass proves that commercial-scale sedimentary clay lithium is achievable. NNLP demonstrates the potential for even higher efficiency and superior economics within the same category. Together, these projects show how local resources can support the energy transition while providing compelling investment opportunities.

NNLPโ€™s higher grades, near-surface mineralization, low strip ratio, and competitive OPEX position it as a leading asset within a now-validated category.

For NILI investors, the message is clear: the clay lithium category is no longer theoretical, and NNLP is positioned to capitalize on the proof-of-concept success. The best news of the year is hereโ€”and itโ€™s grounded in both science and strategy.


DISCLAIMERย 

New Era Publishing Inc. and/or CarbonCredits.com (โ€œWeโ€ or โ€œUsโ€) are not securities dealers or brokers, investment advisers, or financial advisers, and you should not rely on the information herein as investment advice. Surge Battery Metals Inc. (โ€œCompanyโ€) made a one-time payment of $75,000 to provide marketing services for a term of three months. None of the owners, members, directors, or employees of New Era Publishing Inc. and/or CarbonCredits.com currently hold, or have any beneficial ownership in, any shares, stocks, or options of the companies mentioned.

This article is informational only and is solely for use by prospective investors in determining whether to seek additional information. It does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Examples that we provide of share price increases pertaining to a particular issuer from one referenced date to another represent arbitrarily chosen time periods and are no indication whatsoever of future stock prices for that issuer and are of no predictive value.

Our stock profiles are intended to highlight certain companies for your further investigation; they are not stock recommendations or an offer or sale of the referenced securities. The securities issued by the companies we profile should be considered high-risk; if you do invest despite these warnings, you may lose your entire investment. Please do your own research before investing, including reviewing the companiesโ€™ SEDAR+ and SEC filings, press releases, and risk disclosures.

It is our policy that information contained in this profile was provided by the company, extracted from SEDAR+ and SEC filings, company websites, and other publicly available sources. We believe the sources and information are accurate and reliable but we cannot guarantee them.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT AND FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain statements contained in this news release may constitute โ€œforward-looking informationโ€ within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking information generally can be identified by words such as โ€œanticipate,โ€ โ€œexpect,โ€ โ€œestimate,โ€ โ€œforecast,โ€ โ€œplan,โ€ and similar expressions suggesting future outcomes or events. Forward-looking information is based on current expectations of management; however, it is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated.

These factors include, without limitation, statements relating to the Companyโ€™s exploration and development plans, the potential of its mineral projects, financing activities, regulatory approvals, market conditions, and future objectives. Forward-looking information involves numerous risks and uncertainties and actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking information. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, market volatility, the state of financial markets for the Companyโ€™s securities, fluctuations in commodity prices, operational challenges, and changes in business plans.

Forward-looking information is based on several key expectations and assumptions, including, without limitation, that the Company will continue with its stated business objectives and will be able to raise additional capital as required. Although management of the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated, or intended.

There can be no assurance that such forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Additional information about risks and uncertainties is contained in the Companyโ€™s managementโ€™s discussion and analysis and annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2025, copies of which are available on SEDAR+ atย www.sedarplus.ca.

The forward-looking information contained herein is expressly qualified in its entirety by this cautionary statement. Forward-looking information reflects managementโ€™s current beliefs and is based on information currently available to the Company. The forward-looking information is made as of the date of this news release, and the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise such information to reflect new events or circumstances except as may be required by applicable law.


Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: .

Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.

Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.

Platinum Market in 2026: Price Swings, Supply and Demand Challenges, and the Race to Net Zero

Gold has long been seen as the top safe-haven investment. Platinum, however, is gaining attention for its growing role in the global energy transition. Once used mainly in catalytic converters and jewelry, platinum is now essential for hydrogen technologies, advanced manufacturing, and other clean-energy applications.

More industries now rely on platinum, supporting its long-term outlook despite price swings in 2026 and limited supply growth.

According to the World Platinum Investment Council (WPIC) report, the platinum market recorded its first quarterly surplus in six quarters during the first quarter of 2026. The surplus was mainly due to higher mine production and weaker investment demand.

But before we dive into the market dynamics, let’s understand what platinum is and why it is important for the energy transition.

What Is Platinum?

Platinum is a rare, naturally occurring precious metal known for its durability, corrosion resistance, and excellent catalytic properties. It belongs to the platinum group metals (PGMs), which also include palladium, rhodium, iridium, ruthenium, and osmium.

The metal is mined primarily in South Africa, which accounts for roughly 70% of global production, followed by Russia and Zimbabwe. Because platinum deposits are geographically concentrated, securing reliable supplies has become a growing concern as clean energy industries expand.

For decades, platinum’s biggest market was the automotive sector, where it is used in catalytic converters to reduce harmful emissions from gasoline, diesel, and hybrid vehicles. Today, its applications are expanding well beyond transportation

Why Platinum Is Becoming a Critical Energy Transition Metal

Few metals occupy as many strategic industries as platinum.

Unlike gold, whose value is driven primarily by investment demand, or copper, which is closely linked to construction and electrification, platinum supports a remarkably broad range of applications.

Although the automotive industry has historically been the largest consumer of platinum, the metal is now widely used in:

  • petroleum refining
  • chemical production
  • glass manufacturing
  • electronics and semiconductors
  • medical devices
  • low-carbon energy technologies

Its unique physical and chemical properties explain this versatility.

The metal resists corrosion and performs well even in extreme temperatures. It also acts as a highly effective catalyst, speeding up chemical reactions without being consumed. As a result, many industries rely on it for processes that require high performance, durability, and purity.

Today, its uses go beyond traditional industrial applications. As countries work toward net-zero emissions, demand for the metal is growing across clean energy technologies, especially hydrogen.

Because of its expanding role in the energy transition, many experts now view platinum as a strategic transition metal rather than just another precious metal.

Fueling the Hydrogen Economy

One key opportunity for platinum is in the growing hydrogen economy. Hydrogen will help cut emissions in steelmaking, chemicals, shipping, and heavy transport.

PEM Electrolyzersย 

Platinum acts as a catalyst in proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzers. These devices use renewable energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. The IEA reports that current PEM systems need about 0.3 kilograms of platinum for each megawatt (MW) of capacity.

hydrogen platinum
Source: IEA

Green hydrogen produced with platinum-enabled electrolyzers can replace fossil fuels in steelmaking, fertilizer production, chemical manufacturing, and oil refining. These industries account for a significant share of global carbon emissions and are among the hardest to decarbonize.

Hydrogen Fuel Cells

Platinum is also essential for hydrogen fuel cells, which produce electricity by combining hydrogen and oxygen. While battery-powered cars are becoming more common, hydrogen fuel cells are better suited for heavy vehicles such as trucks, buses, trains, ships, and mining equipment. They offer longer driving ranges and faster refueling, making platinum an important metal for cleaner transportation with zero tailpipe emissions.

Countries like China, Japan, South Korea, Germany, and the U.S. are investing in hydrogen infrastructure. So, platinum is likely to benefit from this trend.

Platinum Market Outlook: Q1 2026

The platinum market entered 2026 on the back of one of its strongest rallies in decades. A combination of persistent supply deficits, recovering industrial demand, and growing optimism surrounding hydrogen technologies had pushed prices sharply higher throughout 2025.

A Temporary Surplus Masks a Tight Physical Market

According to WPIC, total platinum supply increased 18% year over year to 1.736 million ounces (1,736 koz). The improvement was largely driven by a recovery in South African mining operations after severe flooding disrupted production during 2025.

  • Refined mine output increased 20% to 1.320 million ounces, while overall mine production rose 22% compared with the same period a year earlier.
  • Recycling also contributed to a higher supply. Elevated platinum prices encouraged greater recovery of spent automotive catalytic converters, lifting recycled supply 7% to 416,000 ounces.
PLATINUM SUPPLY
Source: WPIC report

Demand Shifts in the First Quarter

Total platinum demand reached 1.468 million ounces in the first quarter of 2026. Industrial demand remained strong, but investment demand fell sharply. Investors withdrew about 225,000 ounces from platinum investment products, reversing much of the heavy buying seen in 2025.

  • As a result, the market recorded a 268,000-ounce surplus, compared with a 658,000-ounce deficit in the first quarter of 2025. This was the first quarterly surplus in six quarters.

platinum q1 2026

However, this does not mean the market has too much platinum. The surplus was mainly caused by two temporary factors: higher mine production after earlier disruptions and heavy selling by investors. These are not expected to permanently increase platinum supply.

By the end of the quarter, investor sentiment had weakened. Many investors reduced their holdings, platinum prices fell from their record highs, and the market moved into a temporary surplus.

Annual Supply Growth Remains Constrained

Platinum production bounced back in the first quarter, but its long-term supply outlook is still troubled.

  • WPIC predicts a modest 2% increase in total platinum supply by 2026, reaching 7.377 million ounces. Mine production, the main source, is expected to stay nearly the same at 5.551 million ounces.
  • The report notes a 297,000-ounce deficit for 2026, marking the fourth straight year where demand outstrips supply.
  • Additionally, above-ground inventories are set to drop below three months of annual demand, making the market more sensitive to future supply issues.

Annual demand and supply platinum

Platinum production is different from many industrial metals. About 70% of the world’s supply comes from South Africa. This focus on one area makes the market weak. It can face issues like electricity shortages, labor strikes, aging infrastructure, declining ore grades, and operational delays.

The first quarter showed both the strength and weakness of this supply chain.

Industrial Demand Continues to Diversify

Although investment demand is expected to slow in 2026, platinum’s industrial demand continues to grow, making the market less dependent on investors.

  • WPIC forecasts total platinum demand of 7.674 million ounces in 2026, down 9% from 2025. However, this decline is mainly due to a 54% fall in investment demand followingย last year’s unusually strong buying.

Key Driversย 

Industrial Demand: In contrast, industrial demand is expected to increase by 9%, highlighting platinum’s expanding role in the global economy.

Artificial Intelligence: The rapid expansion of AI is also creating new demand. As companies invest in semiconductor factories and precision manufacturing, platinum-group metals are becoming increasingly important in chip production.

Traditional Demand Remains Resilient

Automotive: Automotive demand is expected to fall by only 2%. Demand remains strong because hybrid and petrol/diesel vehicles are still being produced. Car makers are also replacing more expensive palladium with platinum in catalytic converters.

Jewellery: Jewellery demand is expected to decline by 12% because consumers are spending less. However, jewellery now makes up a smaller share of platinum demand as more industries are using the metal.

platinum demand

Regional Production Trends Highlight Supply Risks

South Africa: Following widespread flooding during early 2025, South African operations recovered strongly. Refined production increased 41% year over year to 1.002 million ounces, supported by improved output from major producers.

Elsewhere, however, production remained under pressure.

Zimbabwe: It produced only 84,000 ounces, representing a 26% decline and the country’s weakest quarterly production in a decade due to scheduled furnace maintenance.

Russia: Production also declined 24% to 136,000 ounces, reflecting production scheduling rather than permanent mine closures.

These contrasting regional trends demonstrate how quickly gains in one jurisdiction can be offset by disruptions elsewhere. Because relatively few countries produce meaningful quantities of platinum, the global market has limited flexibility when operational problems occur.

platinum trends

Recycling is therefore becoming increasingly important.

Higher platinum prices encouraged additional recovery of automotive catalytic converters during the first quarter, increasing recycled supply to 416,000 ounces. WPIC expects recycling to rise 9% during 2026, reaching approximately 1.826 million ounces.

Even so, recycling alone cannot eliminate the supply deficit. Developing new platinum mines requires years of exploration, permitting, and infrastructure investment, making it impossible for supply to respond quickly to rising demand.

Platinum Prices React to the Iran Conflict

The biggest factor affecting platinum prices in early 2026 was investor sentiment, not industrial demand.

  • After rising 127% in 2025, platinum prices reached a record US$2,000 per ounce in January 2026.
  • Investors were optimistic because of supply shortages and growing demand from hydrogen technologies.

However, sentiment changed when tensions between Iran and Israel increased in late February.

Instead of buying precious metals, investors focused on rising oil prices and inflation. Brent crude oil prices rose 55%, increasing expectations that interest rates would stay higher for longer. Higher interest rates make non-yielding assets like platinum less attractive because investors can earn better returns from bonds.

  • As a result, platinum prices fell 16%, while gold dropped 13%. Many investors also sold platinum to lock in profits after its strong rally in 2025.
  • Currently, platinum is priced at USD 1,685.00 per ounce.

platinum prices

Despite the price decline, industrial demand remained strong. The sell-off was mainly driven by investor behaviour, while the physical platinum market continued to face tight supply.

Investment Trends Across Key Markets

Although global investment demand weakened, regional trends varied considerably.

Platinum investment varied across major markets in 2026, showing that demand is becoming more diversified around the world.

  • China: Remained the strongest physical investment market. Bar and coin investment rose 42%, supported by growing interest in hydrogen technologies and advanced manufacturing. The launch of platinum futures on the Guangzhou Futures Exchange in late 2025 also improved trading and price discovery.
  • Japan: Continued to see steady investment. ETF holdings increased by around 31,000 ounces, while net investment reached 21,000 ounces, reflecting strong long-term investor confidence.
  • India: Recorded the fastest growth, with bar and coin investment surging 226% as investors looked beyond gold and became more aware of platinum’s industrial uses.
  • United States: Followed a different trend. Many investors took profits after platinum’s record rally, while higher interest rates encouraged investment in assets that generate regular income.

These regional differences show that platinum investment is becoming more global, with growing demand from Asia helping reduce reliance on Western markets.

platinum investment trends

A Strategic Metal for Net Zero

As governments invest in hydrogen infrastructure and cleaner industrial technologies, platinum is evolving from a precious metal into a strategic material for the energy transition. However, supply remains concentrated in a few countries, mining faces operational challenges, and platinum is relatively expensive. Expanding recycling and developing more efficient catalysts will therefore be important to meeting future demand.

While batteries will drive much of the clean energy transition, platinum will remain essential for hydrogen production, fuel cells, industrial decarbonization, and emissions control. As the hydrogen economy expands, the metal is expected to play an increasingly important role in building a low-carbon future.

Beyond Carbon Credits: How KARBNZ Global Is Building a Natural Capital Platform Around Forests, Biomass, and Biochar

The global carbon market is entering a new era. Investors, corporations, and regulators are no longer satisfied with projects built mainly around future credit issuance and long validation timelines.

Concerns over verification, permanence, transparency, and financing gaps are reshaping expectations across the voluntary carbon market toward a broader question:

  • What does a more durable and financeable natural capital model look like?

That shift is driving a new generation of land-based climate projects that combine reforestation, biomass, biochar, sustainable land management, and long-term land care into diversified operating businesses.

KARBNZ Global is positioning itself at the center of this transition.ย 

According to the company, KARBNZโ€™s platform currently spans more than 1.1 million hectares in Brazil, creating the scale necessary to integrate reforestation, biomass production, biochar carbon removal, and ARR (Afforestation, Reforestation, and Revegetation) carbon credits into a single natural capital platform.

Rather than relying solely on future carbon credits, KARBNZ is building multiple pathways to generate value from restored and sustainably managed forests.

Why Carbon Markets Are Evolving

Traditional carbon projects often require years before generating revenue. Developers must secure land rights, complete environmental studies, establish carbon baselines, and navigate complex verification requirements before credits may be issued.

At the same time, increased scrutiny around older offset projects, particularly avoidance-based methodologies, has made carbon credit buyers more selective. According to Ecosystem Marketplace, the voluntary carbon market declined from around $1.9 billion in 2022 to about $535 million in 2024, and even further down in 2025, as demand shifted to higher-quality projects.

voluntary carbon market vcm price volume and value 2025

Today’s investors increasingly favor projects with:

  • Tangible underlying assets
  • Diversified revenue streams
  • Strong monitoring and verification systems
  • Long-term operational sustainability

The challenge is no longer simply creating carbon credits. It is building climate businesses that can thrive long before credits are issued.

Biochar Is Emerging as a Major Growth Market

A central component of the KARBNZ strategy is biochar.

Biochar is produced by heating biomass such as forestry residues or agricultural waste in a low-oxygen process called pyrolysis. The process makes a stable, carbon-rich material. This material can store carbon for hundreds to thousands of years. It also boosts soil quality and helps with water retention.

The market for biochar is expanding quickly. According to Carbonfuture and CDR.fyi, biochar represented 86% of all durable carbon dioxide removal deliveries in 2024, making it the largest durable carbon removal solution today.

biochar carbon credit market 2025

Corporate demand is also accelerating. Reuters reported that durable carbon removal purchases rose from about 8 million metric tons in 2024 to around 25 million metric tons in 2025. However, issued supply remains below 1 million tons, highlighting a major supply gap for high-quality removals.

KARBNZ says it plans to integrate biochar production directly into its forestry and land management, converting biomass that would otherwise be treated as waste into a high-value climate asset.

The company estimates its biochar operations could ultimately remove about 2.57 million tons of COโ‚‚e annually, positioning KARBNZ among the larger emerging biochar developers globally if those targets are achieved.

KARBNZ in numbers
Source: KARBNZ Global

Creating Revenue Before Carbon Credits

Another distinguishing feature of the KARBNZ model is its focus on generating earlier revenue streams.

Activities such as forest thinning, biomass collection, firebreak creation, and forest health management not only strengthen ecosystems but also produce commercially valuable biomass feedstock.ย 

KARBZN competitive position
Source: KARBZN Global

Global demand for biomass energy continues to grow as countries look for alternatives to coal and other fossil fuels. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), modern bioenergy currently provides about 55% of global renewable energy consumption.

Wood pellets are now a key global commodity, especially in Europe and Asia. Utilities are moving to lower-carbon fuel sources. The global wood pellet market was valued at more than $14 billion in 2024 and is projected to continue growing through the decade.

Brazil plays a major role in this sector. The Brazilian Tree Industry (Ibรก) reports that Brazil has over 10 million hectares of planted forests and is one of the top exporters of forest products globally.

KARBNZ says biomass generated through sustainable land management may support biomass energy, wood pellets, and biochar production. This provides the company with several possible revenue streams as carbon projects move through development.

KARBNZ believes this diversified approach provides investors with something increasingly valuable: tangible operating assets rather than a business model dependent solely on future carbon credit issuance.

The company also emphasizes local economic development through job creation, infrastructure investment, energy access, and long-term regional partnerships.

Natural Capital Is Becoming an Institutional Asset Class

Climate finance is becoming more disciplined. Investors increasingly expect stronger governance, transparent reporting, and robust monitoring systems before committing capital.

KARBNZ says its platform is being built with institutional standards in mind, including project-level SPVs, Verra-aligned ARR methodologies, and advanced MRV (Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification) systems.

According to the company, its MRV architecture will incorporate satellite monitoring,ย AI-driven analytics and blockchain tracking to enhance transparency and auditability.

This reflects a broader industry trend. McKinsey has noted that scaling voluntary carbon markets will require stronger verification systems, higher integrity standards, and greater transparency.

Carbon credits alone are no longer enough. Investors increasingly want long-term businesses built around measurable environmental assets.

That institutional focus is also reflected in the companyโ€™s leadership structure. Managing Partner Pascal van Knijff leads land origination, local partnerships, and platform development, while Managing Partners Rich Neal and David Place focus on capital strategy, commercialization, investor readiness, and institutional execution.

Whatโ€™s Next for KARBNZ

KARBNZ’s next phase is focused on execution. Near-term priorities include:

  • Advance carbon validation work,
  • Expand MRV partnerships,
  • Develop biomass and biochar agreements, and
  • Prepare projects for larger financing rounds.

The company is also developing project-level SPV structures designed to support long-term financing and operational scaling.ย 

More broadly, KARBNZ represents a larger trend reshaping climate finance: the evolution from standalone carbon projects to diversified natural capital platforms.

The future of climate investing may not be built on carbon credits alone. It may be built on integrated systems that combine forests, biomass, biochar, technology, and long-term land stewardship into durable, investable assets.

For KARBNZ Global, the opportunity is larger than issuing credits. It is demonstrating that large-scale ecological restoration can become an institutional asset classโ€”one capable of delivering environmental impact, diversified revenues, and long-term value creation.

As demand for durable carbon removal and nature-based solutions continues to grow, companies that successfully combine restoration with financeable business models may define the next chapter of the natural capital economy. Organizations, investors, and strategic partners seeking exposure to this emerging asset class will be watching closely.

How 2026โ€“2027 Catalysts Could Make AEMC a Standout Nickel Story for Investors

Paid Advertisement – Disseminated on behalf of Alaska Energy Metals Corporation.

Alaska Energy Metals Corporation (AEMC) is moving into a more decisive phase. The company is no longer just an exploration story. Instead, it is building a case around scale, technical validation, and future economics. Yet, despite this progress, its valuation still reflects early-stage risk.

As of June 22, 2026, Alaska Energy Metals holds a market capitalization of CAD 14.56 million, with its shares trading on the TSXV at CAD 0.06. This lean valuation provides a compelling baseline entry point for investors eyeing the critical minerals sector. The current stock consolidation establishes a strong foundation just ahead of key upcoming company catalysts, positioning the company perfectly to leverage the structurally favorable and expanding long-term market for domestic energy metals.

Alaska Energy Metals Market Cap

Source: stockanalysis.com
And this growth story makes it interesting to investors seeking early-stage upside.

Scale First: A Resource That Commands Attention

AEMCโ€™s flagship Nikolai project hosts the Eureka deposit, which is already considered one of the largest undeveloped nickel resources in the United States. In a market increasingly shaped by supply security, scale matters more than ever.

nikolai

The U.S. currently relies heavily on imports for critical minerals like nickel. At the same time, global demand is rising fast due to electric vehicles and energy storage systems. According to industry estimates, nickel demand could double by 2030, driven largely by battery applications.

Against this backdrop, a large domestic resource carries strategic weight. AEMC is not just exploring for metals – it is positioning itself within a supply chain that policymakers now consider critical.

This combination of size and location creates a strong foundation. However, investors will want more than just potential. They need proof that the asset can grow, perform, and eventually generate returns.

Angliers Could Be Alaska Energy Metalsโ€™ Next Growth Driver

The Angliers Project is a nickel exploration property owned by Alaska Energy Metals in western Quebec, Canada. The project covers more than 26,000 hectares in the Tรฉmiscamingue region near the Ontario border. Good road access helps keep exploration costs low.

ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย Location and Access

Alaska energy
Source: AEMC

Promising Geology and Nickel Targets

Angliers sits within the Belleterre-Angliers Greenstone Belt, a region known for mineral deposits. The property contains ultramafic rocks, which often host nickel sulfide deposits. Its geology is similar to Australia’s Kambalda district, a major nickel-producing area.

The project targets nickel, copper, cobalt, and platinum-group metals (PGMs), all of which are important for EV batteries and clean energy technologies.

  • Using machine learning and historical data, the company identified four priority targets. Among them, Area 4 stands out.
  • It hosts a six-kilometer nickel trend, and surface samples returned nickel grades of up to 2,290 ppm.

Meanwhile, prior exploration and government surveys have identified nickel-rich rocks and nearby nickel-copper occurrences. Notably, results from the 2024 VTEM survey revealed several undrilled areas with signs that could point to valuable mineral deposits.

Check out below:

AEMC Angliers

Alaska energy metals
Source: AEMC

August Drilling Could Add Value

As per company sources, AEMC plans to begin drilling at Angliers in August. These results could help confirm the project’s mineral potential.

For investors, the drill program will be an important milestone. Strong results can increase confidence in the resource, reduce uncertainty, and support future development studies. As a result, the project could attract greater market attention.

Although Angliers is still in the early exploration stage, it combines strong geology, encouraging early results, and near-term drilling catalysts. If drilling confirms significant nickel mineralization, the project could become an important source of critical minerals for the growing battery and clean energy markets.

Metallurgy: The Hidden Driver of Value

A large deposit only matters if the metal can be extracted efficiently. This is where metallurgical studies come into play.

AEMC is advancing test work to demonstrate that nickel and cobalt can be recovered at commercially viable rates. Early-stage metallurgy often determines whether a project remains theoretical or becomes investable.

If recovery rates are strong and processing methods remain practical, the implications are significant. Better metallurgy improves project economics by increasing output while controlling costs. It also makes the asset more attractive to strategic partners who prioritize operational simplicity.

In many cases, positive metallurgical results act as a turning point. They shift investor perception from โ€œresource potentialโ€ to โ€œrecoverable value.โ€

eureka claim block
Source: AEMC

The PEA: Turning Geology Into Economics

One of the most important upcoming milestones is the companyโ€™s internal Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA). This study will translate years of exploration into a financial framework.

The PEA will outline expected production levels, capital requirements, operating costs, and potential returns. For investors, this is where the story becomes tangible.

Markets tend to respond strongly to credible economic data. A solid PEA can anchor valuation and provide a clearer benchmark for comparison with peers. It also opens the door to financing discussions, offtake agreements, and strategic partnerships.

For AEMC, this step represents a shift from exploration-driven narratives to numbers-driven analysis.

Alaska energy metals
Source: AEMC

Funding and Policy Support Could Accelerate Growth

Funding remains a key challenge for junior mining companies. However, AEMC operates in a sector that is increasingly supported by government policy.

The United States has prioritized domestic critical mineral supply chains. Programs under frameworks like the Defense Production Act, Project Vault, and other federal initiatives aim to reduce reliance on foreign sources.

AEMC has already engaged with these pathways. Its earlier submission for development funding – reportedly around $56 million – received a โ€œMetโ€ determination, indicating eligibility under government criteria. While this does not guarantee funding, it signals alignment with national priorities.

This alignment matters. Government backing, even partial, can significantly reduce financial risk. It also attracts institutional investors and strategic partners who prefer projects with policy support.

If AEMC secures funding or forms partnerships, it could change the companyโ€™s trajectory quickly. In many cases, funding announcements serve as major re-rating events.

High-Grade Potential Adds Another Layer of Upside

Beyond scale, AEMC is also targeting higher-grade mineralization within its broader resource.

High-grade zones can improve project economics by increasing the amount of metal produced per tonne of ore. This can lower processing costs and enhance early-stage cash flow.

Even limited success in identifying such zones can reshape mine planning. Companies often prioritize higher-grade areas in initial production phases to improve project returns.

For investors, this creates an additional layer of optionality. The project is not just largeโ€”it also has the potential to become more efficient and profitable over time.

2026โ€“2027: A Window of Catalysts

Looking ahead, AEMCโ€™s timeline includes several key inflection points:

  • Expected drilling results at Angliers may refine scale and confidence this year.
  • At the same time, the internal PEA will introduce economic clarity. Progress on permitting and infrastructureโ€”such as access routes and site developmentโ€”will signal movement toward production readiness.
  • Overlaying all of this is the policy environment. Any announcements related to grants, incentives, or strategic investments could amplify the companyโ€™s narrative.

Individually, each catalyst matters. Together, they create a pathway for a broader market re-evaluation.

Valuation AEMC catalysts
Source: AEMC

Valuation Gap: The Core Investment Thesis

Perhaps the most compelling part of the story lies in valuation.

Companies like Canada Nickel, which operate in a similar thematic space, command market capitalizations exceeding $150 million. In contrast, AEMC trades at a fraction of that level despite having a large and growing resource base.

This gap reflects risk, but it also highlights opportunity. As AEMC advances through key milestones, that risk profile could change. When it does, the market may begin to close the valuation gap.

Re-ratings in the mining sector often happen in stages. Early gains come from exploration success. Larger moves typically follow economic validation and funding support.

AEMC appears to be approaching this transition point.

Can Nickel Market Rebalancing Boost Alaska Energy Metals’ Growth Story?

The nickel market is finally showing signs of recovery after years of oversupply, creating a more favorable backdrop for companies like Alaska Energy Metals.

AEMC appears to be approaching this transition point.

Shrinking Indonesian Output

ANZ Research expects the global nickel market to shift from surplus to a small deficit by 2026. This change comes as Indonesia tightens its supply. Indonesia produces 60-70% of the world’s nickel.

They have cut mining quotas, reinstated annual production approvals, and raised costs for producers by changing ore pricing. Disruptions in sulfur and sulfuric acid supplies are also affecting Indonesian processing operations.

AEMC nickel market

These actions could reduce Indonesia’s nickel output by over 60,000 tonnes this year. This may help rebalance the market and support a price floor above $17,000 per tonne. Nickel prices have already risen above $19,000 per tonne due to supply concerns.

This shift is timely for Alaska Energy Metals. The recent downturn saw abundant Indonesian supply lower nickel prices and dampen investor interest in exploration. A tighter market could change that.

Rising Prices Strengthen the Investment Case

Higher nickel prices often improve project economics. They also increase the value investors place on large undeveloped resources. Concerns about supply concentration in Indonesia point to the need for new nickel sources in North America.

Nickel Prices

nickel prices

As Alaska Energy Metals advances its Angliers Project, better market conditions could attract more interest. Resource growth, technical studies, and development milestones will be key in a market seeking new nickel supplies.

In summary, ANZ’s outlook suggests the nickel sector is entering a healthier phase. If the expected supply deficit happens, companies with large-scale nickel assets outside Indonesia may benefit the most.

Final Take: A Strategic Bet on Execution

AEMC is evolving from a speculative explorer into a company with defined growth drivers. Its large-scale resource, ongoing drilling, advancing metallurgy, and upcoming economic studies create a clear roadmap.

At the same time, its alignment with U.S. critical mineral policy adds a strategic dimension that many junior miners lack.

The opportunity for investors lies in execution. If AEMC delivers consistent drilling results, demonstrates strong metallurgy, and advances its economic case, the current valuation may not hold.

In that scenario, the company could shift from being overlooked to being recognized as a meaningful player in the North American nickel supply chain.

For now, the market is waiting. But with multiple catalysts lined up through 2026 and 2027, that wait may not last long.

Qualified Person. Mr. Gregory Beischer, President & CEO of Alaska Energy Metals Corporation, has reviewed and approved the technical content of this document.
Mr. Beischer is a professional geologist (American Institute of Professional Geologists #10505) and is a qualified person under NI43-101.

DISCLAIMERย 

New Era Publishing Inc. and/or CarbonCredits.com (โ€œWeโ€ or โ€œUsโ€) are not securities dealers or brokers, investment advisers, or financial advisers, and you should not rely on the information herein as investment advice. Alaska Energy Metals. (โ€œCompanyโ€) made a one-time payment of $90,000 to provide marketing services for a term of three months. None of the owners, members, directors, or employees of New Era Publishing Inc. and/or CarbonCredits.com currently hold, or have any beneficial ownership in, any shares, stocks, or options of the companies mentioned.

This article is informational only and is solely for use by prospective investors in determining whether to seek additional information. It does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Examples that we provide of share price increases pertaining to a particular issuer from one referenced date to another represent arbitrarily chosen time periods and are no indication whatsoever of future stock prices for that issuer and are of no predictive value.

Our stock profiles are intended to highlight certain companies for your further investigation; they are not stock recommendations or an offer or sale of the referenced securities. The securities issued by the companies we profile should be considered high-risk; if you do invest despite these warnings, you may lose your entire investment. Please do your own research before investing, including reviewing the companiesโ€™ SEDAR+ and SEC filings, press releases, and risk disclosures.

It is our policy that information contained in this profile was provided by the company, extracted from SEDAR+ and SEC filings, company websites, and other publicly available sources. We believe the sources and information are accurate and reliable but we cannot guarantee them.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT AND FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain statements contained in this news release may constitute โ€œforward-looking informationโ€ within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking information generally can be identified by words such as โ€œanticipate,โ€ โ€œexpect,โ€ โ€œestimate,โ€ โ€œforecast,โ€ โ€œplan,โ€ and similar expressions suggesting future outcomes or events. Forward-looking information is based on current expectations of management; however, it is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated.

These factors include, without limitation, statements relating to the Companyโ€™s exploration and development plans, the potential of its mineral projects, financing activities, regulatory approvals, market conditions, and future objectives. Forward-looking information involves numerous risks and uncertainties and actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking information. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, market volatility, the state of financial markets for the Companyโ€™s securities, fluctuations in commodity prices, operational challenges, and changes in business plans.

Forward-looking information is based on several key expectations and assumptions, including, without limitation, that the Company will continue with its stated business objectives and will be able to raise additional capital as required. Although management of the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated, or intended.

There can be no assurance that such forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Additional information about risks and uncertainties is contained in the Companyโ€™s managementโ€™s discussion and analysis and annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2025, copies of which are available on SEDAR+ atย www.sedarplus.ca.

The forward-looking information contained herein is expressly qualified in its entirety by this cautionary statement. Forward-looking information reflects managementโ€™s current beliefs and is based on information currently available to the Company. The forward-looking information is made as of the date of this news release, and the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise such information to reflect new events or circumstances except as may be required by applicable law.

ISO Unveils New Net Zero Standard: How Can It Reshape Corporate Climate Action?

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has made a big move after years of debate on the meaning of “net zero.” They are working to create a single global net-zero framework.

This week, ISO launched a public consultation on ISO 14060, the world’s first international standard designed specifically for net-zero-aligned organizations. The standard aims to help companies create credible, verifiable, and science-based transition plans as they work toward net-zero emissions.

The move comes at a critical time. Net-zero commitments now cover 77% of global GDP, 74% of global emissions, and 79% of the world’s population, according to the Net Zero Tracker. Yet, many of these commitments vary widely in scope, reporting methods, and accountability mechanisms.

ISO hopes the new standard will help close that gap. The organization states that ISO 14060 will give a clear framework that will help all businesses align their strategies with net-zero goals. It will also boost transparency and accountability.

Noelia Garcia Nebra, Head of Sustainability and Partnerships at ISO, said:

โ€œISO 14060 has been developed to provide a globally agreed framework that helps organizations build credible transition plans while supporting resilience, innovation and long-term growth.โ€

The draft standard is now open for consultation across ISO’s network of more than 170 national standards bodies.

The Growing Demand for Credible Net Zero Claims

Net-zero commitments have expanded rapidly over the past decade. According to the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi), more than 12,000 companies worldwide have either set science-based emissions reduction targets or committed to doing so.

Source: SBTi

Together, these companies represent over $80 trillion in market capitalization. They also cover the vast majority of global GDP and greenhouse gas emissions.

However, climate experts have long warned that not all net-zero claims are equal. At the same time, concerns about greenwashing have increased.

A 2025 review by Net Zero Tracker found that while 63% of major firms have set net-zero targets, 31% lack public transition plans, interim targets, or clear disclosures on the use of carbon credits and offsets. And only 4% of those relying on nature-based removals have set transparent targets.

net zero tracker 2025
Source: Net Zero Tracker

Despite more companies having pledges, the findings highlight a persistent gap in minimum integrity standards and clear, actionable roadmaps.

ISO says one of the main goals of the new standard is to create a common understanding of what credible net-zero action looks like. The framework is expected to address emissions reductions, transition planning, reporting, governance, carbon removals, and verification.

The standard builds on ISO’s earlier Net Zero Guidelines (IWA 42). These guidelines were launched at COP27 in 2022. They were developed with input from over 1,200 experts in more than 100 countries.

The Shift From Climate Promises to Climate Plans

The timing of the new standard reflects a broader shift in the climate world. For years, organizations focused on announcing long-term targets.

Today, investors and regulators increasingly want evidence that those targets can actually be achieved. This has increased attention on transition plans.

  • A transition plan shows how a company will cut emissions, handle climate risks, invest money, and change its business model over time.

The new ISO standard helps organizations go beyond general climate promises. It guides them to create clear, structured plans that can be verified by others. The goal is to turn ambition into measurable action.

The pressure is growing. Companies face increasing disclosure requirements from regulators in Europe, North America, and Asia. Investors are also paying closer attention to climate-related risks and transition strategies.

As a result, many organizations are looking for frameworks that provide consistency and credibility in setting and tracking net zero. Below is a quick historical illustration of how net zero came about.ย 

Can ISO Bring Order to a Fragmented Climate Landscape?

One reason ISO 14060 is attracting attention is the growing complexity of the net-zero landscape. Today, organizations can follow guidance from:

These sources help shape their sustainability efforts. While these frameworks often share similar goals, differences in definitions and reporting requirements can create confusion.

The reporting burden continues to grow. The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) says companies now deal with many climate-related disclosure rules. These rules vary by location, standards, and frameworks.

ISO developed its Net Zero Guidelines to help unify the fragmented landscape. They offer a common reference for organizations around the globe. The new standard is expected to build on that foundation and create a framework that can be independently verified.

ISO 14060 net zero standard
Source: ISO

This is especially important for multinational companies. They operate in various countries and must follow different climate reporting rules.

A common global standard may help simplify compliance while improving confidence in corporate climate claims.

What ISO 14060 Could Mean for Carbon Markets

The new standard could also influence carbon markets. A major challenge for carbon credits and carbon removals is the uncertainty about their use in net-zero strategies.

Many organizations support the idea that emissions reductions should come first. However, there is ongoing debate about the role of carbon credits, removals, and offsets in reaching climate goals.

ISO’s earlier Net Zero Guidelines included guidance on emissions reductions, removals, offsets, credits, and claims. The new standard should clarify how these tools align with credible net-zero pathways. That could have important implications for VCMs.

The voluntary carbon market has faced scrutiny in recent years over quality concerns and inconsistent standards. This led to a decreasing volume of transactions in the market, as seen below. Greater alignment around net-zero planning may help improve confidence among buyers and investors.

voluntary carbon market vcm price volume and value 2025

It can also meet the rising need for high-quality carbon removal projects as organizations search for ways to tackle emissions that are hard to cut.

The Hard Reality Behind Corporate Decarbonization

The need for credible climate action remains urgent. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), global energy-related carbon dioxide emissions reached a record 37.4 billion metric tons in 2024 and rose to 38 billion metric tons in 2025.

At the same time, global temperatures continue to rise, and climate-related risks are increasing across many sectors.

Notably, many companies have already made progress. Major corporations such as Microsoft, Google, Apple, and Unilever have invested heavily in renewable energy, energy efficiency, supply chain decarbonization, and carbon removal initiatives. Yet, reducing emissions across complex global operations remains difficult.

For many organizations, Scope 3 emissions from suppliers, transportation, and product use account for the majority of their carbon footprints. This is why businesses are looking for clear and practical climate planning frameworks.

ISO believes the new standard helps organizations face those challenges. It also strengthens resilience, manages risks, and supports long-term growth.

A New Chapter for Global Net Zero Governance

The launch of ISO 14060 marks an important moment in the evolution of corporate climate action. It shows that climate conversation is shifting from ambition to execution. Investors, regulators, customers, and employees increasingly want proof that net-zero commitments can be achieved.

ISO’s new standard aims to provide a common language and a shared framework for organizations around the world. If widely adopted, it could help bring greater consistency, transparency, and credibility to climate action at a time when accountability matters more than ever.

The consultation process is expected to continue over the coming months before the standard moves toward final approval. Once completed, ISO 14060 could become one of the most influential climate standards ever developed.

BYD Opens America’s Largest Battery Project in Chile and Expands in Europe Despite Stock (BYDDY) Slump

BYD is making major moves across the global clean energy market. The Chinese company is speeding up its expansion into Europe and also helping to build the largest battery storage facility in the Americas.ย 

These developments occur when BYD’s stock has faced pressure from slowing profit growth, intense competition in China’s electric vehicle (EV) market, and concerns about pricing. Yet the company’s latest projects suggest it is pursuing a much bigger strategy than vehicle sales alone.

Today, BYD is emerging as a global player across electric vehicles, battery manufacturing, renewable energy, and energy storage.

The company’s growing footprint reflects broader trends reshaping the energy transition. Demand for EVs continues to rise worldwide, while grid operators are investing heavily in battery storage to support growing amounts of solar and wind power.

Against this backdrop, BYD is positioning itself at the center of two of the fastest-growing clean energy markets.

Europe: BYD’s Most Important Battleground

Europe is becoming one of BYD’s most important international markets. The company plans to begin production at its first European passenger vehicle factory in Hungary during the fourth quarter of 2026. The facility could help BYD grow its local manufacturing. It will also lower tariffs on imports of Chinese-made EVs.

The move comes as BYD’s European sales continue to surge. Itย sold nearly 188,000 vehicles across Europe in 2025, a jump of about 270% from the previous year. Sales growth stayed strong in 2026. Registrations climbed about 144% year-over-year through May, surpassing 100,000 vehicles.

BYD europe ev sales march 2026
Source: Electric-Vehicles.com

The expansion reflects the growing importance of the European EV market. The International Energy Agency (IEA) reports that global electric car sales topped 17 million in 2024. This means over 20% of all new cars sold worldwide were electric. The agency expects EV adoption to continue growing as battery costs decline and governments strengthen emissions policies.

Europe remains one of the largest EV markets globally. However, competition is intensifying as Chinese manufacturers gain market share and challenge established automakers.

For BYD, local production could help strengthen its position in the region while supporting long-term growth.

A Record-Breaking Chile Project Showcases BYDโ€™s Battery Power

While BYD is best known for electric vehicles, energy storage is becoming an increasingly important part of its business. That strategy received a major boost with the inauguration of the Elena battery storage project in Chile’s Atacama Desert.ย 

  • The facility can store 3.5 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of energy. This makes it the largest battery energy storage system in the Americas.

Grenergy, a Spanish renewable energy company, developed the project. It uses 6,240 battery modules from BYD, all stored in 624 containers.

BYD battery energy storage in Chile

The scale is significant. This battery system can store enough electricity to power hundreds of thousands of homes during peak demand. It all depends on local consumption patterns.

The Elena project’s launch increases BYD’s total battery supply to the Oasis de Atacama development to 6.5 GWh. In March, Grenergy signed another agreement with BYD for 2.6 GWh of battery storage for the Central Oasis project in central Chile.

The $900 million development is expected to begin operations between 2026 and 2027. Together, the two projects give BYD more than 9 GWh of contracted battery storage capacity in Chile. This shows the company’s expanding role in one of the world’s fastest-growing energy storage markets.

Why Batteries Are Becoming the Backbone of the Energy Transition

The timing of BYD’s energy storage expansion aligns with powerful global trends. As renewable energy deployment accelerates, demand for battery storage is growing rapidly.

Solar and wind generation can fluctuate depending on weather conditions and time of day. Battery systems help solve that challenge by storing excess electricity and releasing it when needed.

According to the International Energy Agency, global battery storage capacity surpassed 280 gigawatts (GW) in 2025. The IEA expects deployment to grow several times over by 2030 as countries invest in more flexible electricity grids. Bloomberg’s forecast also shows the same trend.

global energy storage BNEF

Energy storage is now considered a critical technology for achieving climate goals. The IEA estimates that global renewable energy capacity additions reached nearly 700 GW in 2024, the highest annual increase ever recorded. Much of that growth will require large-scale storage systems to maintain grid reliability.

Chile has become an important test case for this transition. The Atacama Desert receives some of the highest levels of solar radiation in the world. However, much of that solar power is generated during the day when electricity demand is lower.

Battery storage allows excess energy to be saved and delivered later, increasing the value of renewable generation. Projects like Elena show how batteries are becoming essential infrastructure for modern power systems.

From Electric Cars to Energy Systems: BYDโ€™s Expanding Climate Vision

The company’s expansion also supports broader climate goals. BYD has become one of the world’s largest producers of electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles. The company sold approximately 4.6 million vehicles in 2025, making it one of the six largest automakers globally.

The EV giant stopped making regular gasoline-only cars in 2022 and is now focusing only on new energy vehicles. The company believes its vehicles have reduced carbon dioxide emissions by hundreds of millions of tons. This is a significant drop compared to traditional transportation.

At the same time, BYD continues to invest heavily in battery technology, manufacturing efficiency, and renewable energy integration.

Its battery business now serves both transportation and stationary energy storage markets. This dual strategy could become increasingly important as global electricity systems electrify and demand for clean energy infrastructure grows.

Investors’ Take: Why BYD’s Stock Trades Low

Despite these operational achievements, investor caution has intensified as BYD’s financial slowdown extends deep into 2026. The company faced its first annual profit decline in four years in 2025. Net profit dropped by 19% to 32.6 billion yuan (US$4.7 billion).

Automotive gross margins fell to 20.5%, and revenue growth slowed to a six-year low of 3.5%. This financial strain worsened significantly. BYDโ€™s net profit fell by 55% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2026. A fierce price war drove this drop at home. It signals a harsh new “elimination phase” for the industry.

The results reflect the challenges facing China’s EV industry. Competition has intensified as manufacturers cut prices to defend market share. The resulting pressure has weighed on profitability across the sector.

Investors are also watching how quickly BYD can translate strong international sales growth into sustainable earnings growth. As a result, the company’s shares have experienced periods of volatility and recently traded near their lowest levels in more than a year.

BYD stock share price

Analysts say BYD keeps investing heavily in manufacturing, exports, battery production, and energy infrastructure. This is despite short-term pressures.

A Broader Energy Company Is Taking Shape

BYD’s latest projects show how the company is evolving beyond electric vehicles. Its new factory in Hungary supports global EV growth, while the Chile battery project strengthens its position in energy storage.

The shift reflects a broader trend across the energy transition, where electric vehicles, batteries, renewable power, and electricity grids are becoming more connected.

BYD’s exports continue to grow, its European expansion is accelerating, and its battery storage business is reaching record scale. Despite investor concerns about short-term profitability, the company is increasingly positioning itself as a major clean energy player, not just an automaker.

Carbon Credit Retirements Hit Record High Despite Falling Supply: What Does This Say About the Market?

After several years of scrutiny, the voluntary carbon market (VCM) is showing signs of renewed strength. According to the latest H1 2026 report from AlliedOffsets, carbon credit retirements reached their strongest January-to-May performance on record.

The numbers are notable because they come during a period of lower credit supply. In the first half of 2026, carbon credit issuances fell 44% year over year, but retirements went up 4%. This is the highest first-half retirement volume since AlliedOffsets started tracking the market.

A Rare Market Shift: Demand Is Rising While Supply Shrinks

The milestone shows the highest five-month start for the voluntary carbon market, which means buyers still use carbon credits. They do this even with ongoing debates about quality, regulation, and climate claims.

A major driver came in May, when Hess retired 12.5 million Guyana REDD+ credits. This helps push cumulative retirements to an all-time high for the January-May period.

carbon credit retirements H1 2026
Source: AlliedOffsets

The trend matters because retirements are widely viewed as one of the clearest indicators of real market demand. When companies retire credits, they permanently remove them from circulation and use them toward climate commitments. Unlike project announcements or future purchase agreements, retirements represent actual carbon market activity.

One of the most important findings from the report is that demand appears to be holding up despite a decline in new supply.

Global issuances dropped from 156.2 million credits in H1 2025 to 108.2 million in H1 2026. At the same time, retirements increased from 99.8 million to 104 million credits. This creates a very different market dynamic from previous years.

carbon credit issuances vs retirements h1 2026
Source: AlliedOffsets

For much of the last decade, the carbon market struggled with excess supply. Large inventories often pushed prices lower and raised concerns about credit quality. Today, fewer new credits are entering the market while more credits are being retired.

The carbon pricing data reflects that shift.

Buyers Are Paying More for Higher-Quality Credits

AlliedOffsets found that retirement volumes are increasingly occurring at higher price points. In 2026, buyers are more open to purchasing expensive credits. This is a change from past years when most retirements focused on cheaper credits.

That trend suggests a growing demand for higher-quality carbon projects rather than a race to secure the lowest-cost credits. Many companies now focus on stronger environmental integrity instead of just low-cost offsets. They want better verification and greater confidence in their climate impact.

carbon prices alliedoffsets
Source: AlliedOffsets

 

This trend could help support pricing across the voluntary carbon market as demand increasingly favors quality over quantity.

New Buyers Are Entering the Market

The market is also becoming more diverse. Active buyer participation in 2026 has already exceeded previous years, says AlliedOffsets. However, overall transaction volumes are still below the record levels of 2025.

Asia has emerged as the fastest-growing source of new entrants.

The report shows that more companies entered the carbon market from Asia than from any other region in 2026. This growth has been supported by initiatives such as Singapore’s Action for a Resilient Climate (ARC) Coalition, which aims to procure at least 10 million tonnes of carbon credits by 2030.

new market buyers asia leading
Source: AlliedOffsets

The trend reflects broader changes in global climate policy.

Many Asian economies have strengthened emissions targets, launched carbon pricing systems, and increased participation in Article 6 carbon market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement. As a result, carbon market demand is becoming less concentrated in North America and Europe.

Carbon Removal Is Scalingโ€”But Supply Still Can’t Keep Up

The carbon dioxide removal (CDR) market is also evolving, although growth remains uneven.

AlliedOffsets reports that cumulative CDR offtake agreements have reached approximately 48.5 million tonnes, compared with only about 2.65 million tonnes of issued credits since 2022. This means demand commitments remain roughly 18 times larger than actual delivered supply.

Biochar continues to lead the sector.

The pathway accounts for 57% of all-time CDR issuances and 53% of all retirements. Biochar has generated approximately 1.58 million credits out of 2.75 million total CDR issuances and remains the only removal technology delivering significant volumes across issuances, retirements, and offtake agreements.

biochar carbon credits
Source: AlliedOffsets

Enhanced rock weathering is also gaining momentum. Offtake volumes increased from 10,000 tonnes in 2022 to 470,000 tonnes in 2025, while issuances continue to rise in 2026.

By contrast, direct air capture faces ongoing scale challenges. Although more than 2 million tonnes have been contracted, only about 0.1% has been issued to date. High costs, often ranging from $300 to $1,000 per tonne, remain a major obstacle.

Policy Developments Are Reshaping the Market

Government policies are becoming increasingly important for market growth.

The Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (PACM), the successor to the Clean Development Mechanism, now has 22 registered projects and has issued its first credits in 2026.

The inaugural Myanmar cookstove project generated 58,428 credits, roughly 40% below previous CDM estimates. This highlights stricter accounting standards under the new framework.

At the same time, Article 6 markets continue to expand. Countries such as Singapore, South Korea, Vietnam, Chile, India, and Cambodia have strengthened their carbon market infrastructure and international trading frameworks.

The aviation sector is also preparing for greater carbon credit demand. AlliedOffsets estimates that only 37.9 million tonnes of CORSIA Phase 1-eligible supply currently exist. This is far below the projected airline demand of roughly 200 million tonnes.

If those demand projections materialize, high-quality credits could become increasingly valuable over the coming years.

The Market Is Moving From Quantity to Quality

One of the clearest themes emerging from 2026 is the shift toward quality. CCP-approved credit issuances increased 64% year over year in H1 2026, while issuances from rejected projects fell 67%. On the demand side, retirements of CCP-approved credits rose 18%. This suggests that buyers are becoming more selective.

CCP approved credits h1 2026
Source: AlliedOffsets

The trend aligns with broader developments across the climate sector. Investors, regulators, and standard setters are placing greater emphasis on transparency, additionality, permanence, and verification.

Recent updates from the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi), the growing use of Article 6 mechanisms, and stronger integrity frameworks are all pushing the market toward higher standards.

A New Phase for Carbon Markets

The record retirement volumes seen in early 2026 suggest that the voluntary carbon market may be entering a new phase. Supply is tightening. Prices are rising.

More buyers are entering the market. Carbon removal technologies continue to mature. Governments are building new compliance frameworks. And companies pursuing net-zero goals are increasingly looking for higher-quality credits.

Challenges remain. Issuances have fallen sharply, removal supply remains limited, and policy uncertainty still affects some markets.

Yet, the latest data show that demand has not disappeared. In fact, buyers appear to be becoming more selective and more willing to pay for quality.

That shift could help shape the next chapter of global carbon markets as companies, investors, and governments work toward increasingly ambitious climate goals.

READ MORE: IATAโ€™s New Carbon Credit Alliance: Can Aviation Secure Enough Offsets for Net Zero?

Formula 1โ€™s (F1) Race to Net Zero Gains Speed as Emissions Fall 35%: Can It Really Reach the Finish Line?

Formula 1 has reported a 35% reduction in its carbon footprint since 2018, putting the sport on track to achieve its Net Zero 2030 target. The latest figures show that emissions fell to around 148,800 tonnes of COโ‚‚ equivalent (tCOโ‚‚e) in 2025, down from a 2018 baseline of 228,793 tCOโ‚‚e. The sport also reduced emissions by 12% compared with 2024 alone.

The update comes as the 2026 FIA Formula One World Championship is currently underway. Teams are competing across a 24-race global calendar that runs from March to December.

The season has already completed seven rounds and remains one of the most ambitious in the sport’s history. It features new regulations, expanded sustainability initiatives, and preparations for the introduction of 100% advanced sustainable fuels in 2026.

The achievement is notable because Formula 1 has continued to expand during the same period. Stefano Domenicali, President and CEO of F1, remarked:

“At Formula 1, we act and show our achievements through facts, not just words, and I am incredibly proud that we remain on track to achieve Net Zero by 2030, made possible by the collective effort across the sport to reduce our environmental impact.”

Since 2018, the race calendar has expanded from 21 to 24 events. Annual attendance jumped from 4 million to 6.5 million fans, and the sport’s global fan base now exceeds 826 million.

Despite that growth, F1 has removed nearly 80,000 tonnes of COโ‚‚e from its operations. This suggests the sport is reducing emissions even as its global reach continues to grow.

Why Formula 1 Set a Net Zero Goal

Formula 1 launched its sustainability strategy in 2019 and committed to reaching net zero carbon emissions by 2030. The goal is not simply to offset emissions. F1’s strategy needs at least a 50% cut in emissions from its 2018 baseline. After that, any remaining emissions can be handled through credible carbon removal or offset programs.

The challenge is significant because racing itself contributes only a small share of Formula 1’s emissions.

According to the sport’s sustainability report, the largest sources come from logistics, travel, factories, facilities, and race operations. Moving cars, equipment, and people between continents each year leaves a big environmental mark.

Formula 1 F1 carbon emissions 2025
Source: Formula 1

That challenge is becoming more important as global pressure grows for sports organizations to reduce emissions.

Sports-related emissions are drawing increasing attention from sponsors, investors, governments, and fans. Large international events like the ongoing 2026 FIFA World Cup often involve extensive travel, freight movement, energy use, and infrastructure requirements.

For Formula 1, reaching net zero has become both an environmental goal and a business priority.

Travel and Logistics Remain the Biggest Battleground

Travel has historically been one of Formula 1’s largest sources of emissions. The latest report shows that travel-related emissions have fallen by more than 21,000 tCOโ‚‚e since 2018, representing a 27% reduction. Several initiatives helped achieve this result.

One of the most important has been the increased use of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). Formula 1 and its teams have doubled their SAF investments since 2024, says Ellen Jones, F1’s Head of ESG. This move has cut air charter emissions by about 40%, which is equal to 20,000 tCOโ‚‚e.

Formula 1 F1 carbon emissions with SAF
Source: Formula 1

SAF is becoming a key tool for industries that rely heavily on air travel. IATA says sustainable aviation fuel can cut lifecycle emissions by up to 80% compared to regular jet fuel. This reduction depends on the feedstock and how itโ€™s made.

Formula 1 is also changing how it moves equipment around the world.

The sport is shifting more freight from air transport to sea and land transportation, which generally produce lower emissions. For the first time, lower-carbon solutions are now being used across all three major freight modes: air, sea, and land.

Formula 1 aims to cut over 50% of broadcast and related freight from air transport by 2030. This move could lead to further reductions.

How Renewable Power Is Rewriting the Formula 1 Playbook

Another major source of emissions comes from factories, offices, and team facilities.

Formula 1 says emissions from these operations have fallen by more than 37,000 tCOโ‚‚e since 2018, representing a 64% reduction. Compared with 2024 alone, emissions dropped another 14%. Much of this progress comes from switching to renewable electricity.

Formula 1, its teams, and the FIA have expanded the use of renewable power across offices, technical centers, and manufacturing facilities. Several teams now source significant portions of their electricity from renewable energy.

This mirrors a broader trend across industries.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), renewable energy additions reached nearly 700 gigawatts globally in 2024, the largest annual increase ever recorded. Businesses are increasingly turning to renewable power as one of the fastest ways to reduce operational emissions.

For Formula 1, these changes have delivered some of the largest carbon reductions achieved so far.

Sustainable Fuels Could Become Formula 1’s Biggest Climate Legacy

One of Formula 1’s most ambitious projects will arrive in 2026. The sport plans to introduce 100% sustainable fuel for all next-generation hybrid race cars. The fuel is being developed with support from manufacturers, suppliers, the FIA, and energy partners.

The impact could extend far beyond racing.

The companyย says the fuel is designed as a “drop-in” solution that can work in many existing internal combustion engines. Supporters think this technology can cut emissions from almost 2 billion vehicles worldwide. It offers a way to improve the current fleet without needing immediate replacements.

Advanced sustainable fuels can reduce carbon emissions by approximately 85% to 96% compared with conventional fossil fuels, according to Formula 1.

Interestingly, race fuel itself accounts for less than 1% of Formula 1’s total emissions. The sport thinks the technology could impact the wider transportation sector. It may speed up the use of lower-carbon fuels. This aligns with a growing global market.

SAF market 2034

Industry forecasts predict that the sustainable aviation fuel market could grow from billions today to tens of billions annually in the next decade. Airlines are looking for alternatives to fossil fuels.

Sustainability Is Becoming a Competitive Advantage for Global Sports

Formula 1 is not alone in pursuing climate goals. Sports organizations worldwide are investing in sustainability programs as environmental performance becomes a bigger part of sponsorship, broadcasting, and brand value.

The global sports industry generates hundreds of billions of dollars annually and has a significant environmental footprint. Major leagues and event organizers increasingly face pressure to reduce emissions and improve sustainability reporting.

Formula 1’s latest results show that emissions reductions can occur alongside growth.

Since 2018, the sport has added more races, attracted more fans, and grown its audience. At the same time, it has cut emissions significantly. Formula 1’s analysis shows that without sustainability measures, its carbon footprint would have risen by about 10% during that time.

That makes the reported reductions particularly significant.

Four Years to Go: Is F1 Really on Track for Net Zero?

Formula 1 still has work to do before reaching its 2030 target. The sport must continue cutting emissions across travel, logistics, facilities, and race operations while managing future growth. It must also ensure that any remaining emissions are addressed through credible climate solutions.

However, the latest figures suggest that the strategy is working.

A 35% reduction since 2018, nearly 80,000 tonnes of emissions eliminated, a 64% cut in facility emissions, and a 27% drop in travel emissions all indicate measurable progress.

For Formula 1, the challenge has never been simply making race cars greener. The larger task has been reducing emissions across a global operation that moves people, equipment, and technology around the world every week.

With four years remaining until 2030, the sport appears closer than ever to proving that growth, performance, and emissions reductions can move forward together.

AI’s Next Frontier Is Space, but Orbital Data Centers Cost 3x More Than Earth, Says Wood Mackenzie

Artificial intelligence is causing a huge rise in computing demand. Today’s AI models already use a lot of electricity. The next generation of AI agents could need 10,000 to 40,000 times more computing power for each task than todayโ€™s chatbots, according to a new report from Wood Mackenzie.

This rapid growth is stressing power grids and data centers around the world. As electricity demand increases and suitable land becomes harder to find, some big tech companies are looking beyond Earth. They are exploring orbital data centers powered by constant solar energy in space.

The report explains why this futuristic idea is getting attention. It also points out a major challenge. Building an orbital data center is still much more expensive than one on Earth.

  • Currently, an orbital facility costs more than 3X as much as a similar data center on land, making it a long-term opportunity, not a short-term solution.

AI Is Pushing Data Center Power Demand to New Highs

The rapid adoption of AI is reshaping global electricity demand.

Wood Mackenzie estimates that global data centers will consume about 460 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in 2026โ€”roughly half of Japan’s annual electricity generation.

That figure is expected to rise dramatically:

  • 2026: 460 TWh
  • 2030: 1,280 TWh
  • 2040: 3,700 TWh
  • That represents a 703% increase between 2026 and 2040, equal to an annual growth of around 16%. The United States and China dominate this expansion, accounting for nearly 78% of the world’s planned data center pipeline.

However, keeping all of those facilities on Earth is becoming increasingly difficult.

data center electricity ai
Source: Wood Mackenzie

Space Solves Many Problemsโ€”Except the Cost

Building large data centers has become far more complicated than it was just a few years ago.

Across the United States, developers often wait up to seven years to secure power grid connections. At the same time, gas turbines face delivery backlogs stretching through 2030, while many regions struggle with limited water supplies needed for cooling systems.

Additionally, construction costs are also higher because of higher labor and material prices. These challenges are encouraging companies to explore alternativesโ€”including orbital data centers powered by uninterrupted solar energy in space.

Unlike terrestrial facilities, orbital data centers would avoid many of today’s infrastructure bottlenecks. They would not compete for land, freshwater, or overloaded electricity grids.

The challenge, however, is economics.

The Massive Price Tag of Orbital Data Centers

Wood Mackenzie estimates that building a hypothetical 1-gigawatt orbital data center would require around US$170 billion in investment.

More than 60% of that cost would come from launching equipment into orbit and building satellite infrastructure.

orbital data center earth data center
Source: Wood Mackenzie

According to Wood Mackenzie, orbital facilities would only become cost-competitive if launch costs continue falling at historical rates. The report estimates that total costs must decline by about 70% before space-based computing can compete with terrestrial infrastructure.

Jeff Bezos Says Cost Is the Only Real Barrier

The debate over orbital computing gained fresh attention after Jeff Bezos spoke at the VivaTech conference in Paris.

The Blue Origin founder argued that the science behind orbital data centers is largely solved. Instead, he believes economics remains the only major obstacle.

According to Bezos, future computing infrastructure could eventually be built using materials mined from asteroids, the Moon, and other space resources. Chips could even be manufactured in orbit using abundant solar energy before transmitting computing results back to Earth.

He has previously said two milestones are needed before orbital computing becomes practical:

  • Launch costs must fall by roughly tenfold.
  • Energy must become a much larger share of total data center operating costs.

Blue Origin is working toward both goals through its next-generation launch systems.

Bezos also emphasized a gradual approach to space development, arguing that building sustainable infrastructure around the Moon should come before more ambitious plans for Mars.

Market Potential

Despite today’s high costs, analysts believe orbital computing could become a major industry over the next decade.

  • Analysts expect the orbital data center industry to grow from $1.77 billion in 2029 toย $39.09 billion by 2035. This shows a remarkable compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 67.4%.

orbital data center space data center market

SpaceX Is Betting Big on Orbital Computing

Among companies pursuing orbital data centers, SpaceX appears to have the most ambitious plans.

Together with xAI, the company has announced a long-term goal of deploying 100 gigawatts of orbital computing capacity every year.

According to Wood Mackenzie, that target is roughly ten times larger than the combined announced pipeline of every other orbital data center developer worldwide.

Outside the United States, announced projects remain limited, totaling less than 0.5 GW of planned capacity. The report expects launch activity among leading developers to begin accelerating between 2027 and 2028, although commercial deployment remains several years away.

A Booming Space Economy Could Slash Orbital Computing Costs

Although orbital computing remains expensive, the broader space economy is advancing rapidly. Global orbital launch attempts climbed to 324 missions in 2025, up 25% from the previous year. Commercial companies carried out roughly 70% of those launches.

Meanwhile, reusable rockets have already reduced launch costs by approximately 90% compared with traditional expendable launch systems.

Satellite deployment is also accelerating. A record 4,517 satellites entered orbit during 2025, representing a 58% increase over the previous year. Nearly 87% were launched by private companies rather than governments.

These trends suggest that launch costs could continue falling over time, improving the economics of orbital infrastructure. And much of that growth depends on continued advances in reusable launch systems, satellite manufacturing, and lower transportation costs.

Despite the Hype, Orbital Data Centers Are Still a Long-Term Bet

Wood Mackenzie concludes that orbital computing remains a promising long-term technology rather than an immediate replacement for traditional data centers.

Space offers clear advantages, including abundant solar power, freedom from grid congestion, and reduced pressure on land and water resources. However, those benefits are currently outweighed by the enormous cost of getting computing infrastructure into orbit.

For now, the industry’s money is still flowing to Earth-based facilities.

The firm’s Research Director, Robert Liew, notes that the infrastructure challenges facing terrestrial data centers are real, but they are unlikely to shift investment away from the ground until launch costs fall dramatically.

Earth Remains the Main Investment Destination

While interest in orbital computing is growing, companies continue investing heavily in conventional data centers.

AI company Anthropic, for example, recently committed US$45 billion over three years to access SpaceX’s 300-megawatt Colossus 1 terrestrial data center, which will operate with 220,000 Nvidia GPUs.

  • Wood Mackenzie forecasts approximately US$9 trillion in cumulative investment between 2026 and 2040 to build nearly 395 GW of new terrestrial data center capacity.

That spending highlights where the industry still sees the strongest near-term opportunities.

Last but not least, in the coming decades, orbital data centers could become an important part of the AI ecosystem. Until then, they remain a bold vision whose success depends less on technology than on making space transportation dramatically cheaper.

Carbon Accounting Explained: The Complete Guide to Measuring, Reporting, and Reducing Corporate Emissions

Climate action starts with measurement. Before companies can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, achieve net-zero goals, or show sustainability progress to investors, they first need to understand where their emissions come from and how much they produce. This process is known as carbon accounting.

Once seen as a niche sustainability activity, carbon accounting has become a core business function.

The change has been significant. In 2024, more than 24,800 companies disclosed environmental data through CDP, representing over two-thirds of global market capitalization.

The number of reporting organizations has grown nearly fivefold over the past decade. This reflects the growing importance of climate transparency in business decisions.

Investors use emissions data to assess climate risks. Regulators increasingly require climate disclosures. Customers and stakeholders expect transparency. Companies also rely on carbon data to find opportunities to improve efficiency and reduce emissions.

In many ways, carbon accounting is becoming as important as financial accounting.

This guide explains what carbon accounting is, how it works, and why it matters. It also explores how new technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) are transforming how organizations track and manage their carbon footprints.

What Is Carbon Accounting?

Carbon accounting is the process of measuring, tracking, and reporting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions produced by a company, product, service, or activity.

The goal is to create a complete emissions inventory and convert it into a common unit called carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). This standard measurement allows organizations to compare the climate impact of different greenhouse gases, including:

  • Carbon dioxide (CO2),
  • Methane (CH4),
  • Nitrous oxide (N2O),
  • Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs),
  • Perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and
  • Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6).

By measuring emissions in CO2e, businesses can assess their environmental impact, set reduction targets, and track progress over time.

Think of carbon accounting as the environmental version of financial accounting. Just as companies track revenue, expenses, and assets, they now track emissions as an important business metric.

carbon accounting or reporting
Source: Shutterstock

Why Carbon Accounting Has Become a Business Priority

Over the past decade, climate reporting has shifted from a voluntary sustainability effort to a business requirement. Several factors are driving this change.

Why Investors Are Following the Carbon Trail

Climate risk is increasingly viewed as financial risk.

Asset managers, pension funds, banks, and institutional investors rely on emissions data. They use it to evaluate companies’ risks from regulatory changes, carbon pricing, and supply chain issues. This data also helps them understand the challenges of transitioning to a low-carbon economy.

Environmental performance has also become an important part of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing.

Investor interest in sustainability continues to grow. According to the Global Sustainable Investment Alliance, sustainable investment assets reached more than $30 trillion across major global markets in 2023. But under stricter tracking rules, that figure sits at $16.7 trillion in 2025.

Broader industry assessments by โ Fortune Business Insights valued the total global ESG investing market at $39.08 trillion in 2025.ย This makes climate performance an increasingly important factor in capital allocation decisions.

Organizations that provide transparent emissions data often gain greater credibility with investors and stakeholders.

Climate Disclosure Is Becoming the New Normal

Many governments worldwide are now enforcing climate disclosure regulations. These rules ask companies to report their greenhouse gas emissions and related climate risks.

The European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) framework, California’s climate disclosure laws, and similar initiatives across Asia-Pacific are boosting the need for reliable carbon accounting systems.

And so many companies, emissions reporting is no longer optional. This is especially true in the case of large corporations.ย 

The Supply Chain Transparency Revolution

Large companies now require suppliers to disclose emissions data as part of their procurement and sustainability programs. For example, Marks & Spencer and Schneider Electric partner to enable suppliers to directly report and track emissions data through their initiative RE:Spark.ย 

The platform combines digital reporting with actionable, aggregated renewable energy procurement to convert Scope 3 data into verifiable, actionable reductions.

As a result, even small and medium-sized businesses are finding carbon accounting to be a must-have to stay competitive.

You Can’t Cut What You Don’t Measure

Thousands of companies around the world have announced emissions reduction targets or net-zero goals. More than 12,000 companies have committed to science-based climate targets through the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi).

companies with net zero targets
Source: SBTi

Thousands more have announced net-zero ambitions. However, organizations cannot manage what they do not measure.

Carbon accounting provides the baseline needed to identify opportunities for reduction and track progress toward climate targets.

The Three Emissions Categories Every Business Must Know

Most companies follow the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, the world’s most widely used emissions accounting framework. The protocol divides emissions into three categories. Here they are in detail.

Scope 1: Direct Emissions

Scope 1 emissions come directly from sources owned or controlled by a company. Examples include:

  • Fuel burned in company-owned vehicles,
  • Natural gas used in manufacturing facilities,ย 
  • Industrial production processes, and
  • Company-operated equipment.

These emissions come directly from business operations.

Scope 2: Purchased Energy Emissions

Scope 2 emissions come from purchased electricity, steam, heating, or cooling. Although the emissions occur at the power plant, the organization using the energy is responsible for reporting them.

Examples of these emissions are:

  • Office electricity consumption,ย 
  • Factory power use, and
  • Purchased district heating.

For many service-based businesses, electricity use is the largest source of Scope 2 emissions.

carbon emission sources scope 1, 2, and 3
Source: Shutterstock

Scope 3: Value Chain Emissions

Scope 3 emissions occur throughout a company’s value chain and are often the hardest to measure. These emissions often come from two types of sources.

Upstream activities:

  • Purchased goods and services
  • Transportation and distribution
  • Employee commuting
  • Business travel
  • Waste generated by operations

Downstream activities:

  • Product transportation
  • Product use
  • Product disposal
  • Franchises
  • Investments

For many industries, Scope 3 emissions account for more than 70% of total emissions. In sectors such as retail, consumer goods, and financial services, they can even exceed 90%.

For the food chain giant, McDonald’s, this source accounts for a massive 99% of its total emissions.

McDonald's scope 3 emissions

According to CDP, Scope 3 emissions are, on average, more than 26 times greater than operational emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2 combined). This shows why value-chain emissions have become a key focus of corporate climate strategies.

Because of their scale, Scope 3 emissions have become a major focus of corporate sustainability programs.

How Carbon Accounting Works: A Step-by-Step Guide

While approaches vary between organizations, most carbon accounting follows a similar process. Here are the ways you can use to compute your company’s emissions.ย 

Step 1: Define Organizational Boundaries

The first step is deciding which facilities, operations, subsidiaries, and business units will be included in the emissions inventory.

This sets the reporting boundary.

Step 2: Identify Emission Sources

Next, organizations identify all activities that generate greenhouse gas emissions. Common sources include electricity consumption, fuel use, manufacturing processes, transportation, business travel, purchased goods, and waste management.ย 

The more complete the inventory, the more accurate the final emissions calculations.

Step 3: Collect Activity Data

Companies gather measurable data linked to emission-generating activities. Examples include:

  • Kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity consumed,
  • Liters of diesel fuel purchased,
  • Miles traveled by aircraft,
  • Tons of raw materials purchased, and
  • Freight transportation distances.

This step is often the most time-consuming part of carbon accounting.

For large multinational companies, collecting emissions data can involve thousands of suppliers, facilities, and business processes across multiple countries. This makes data collection one of the biggest challenges in climate reporting.

Step 4: Apply Emission Factors

Emission factors convert activity data into greenhouse gas emissions.

For example, if a company uses 10,000 liters of diesel fuel each year, a recognized emission factor can be used to calculate the related CO2e emissions.

Government agencies, scientific institutions, and international organizations typically publish these emission factors.

Step 5: Calculate Total Emissions

All emissions are converted into CO2e and combined across Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 categories.

The result is the organization’s carbon footprint.

Step 6: Verify and Report Results

Many organizations seek third-party verification to improve transparency and credibility. Verified emissions data is often included in sustainability reports, ESG disclosures, and annual reports. They can also be part of regulatory filings and net-zero progress updates.

how carbon accounting works

A Real-World Look at Carbon Accounting in Action

To see how carbon accounting works in practice, let’s walk through a simplified example for a manufacturing company. Assume the company reports the following annual activity data:

  • Electricity consumption: 500,000 kWh
  • Diesel fuel use: 100,000 liters
  • Employee air travel: 500,000 miles

To calculate emissions, the company multiplies each activity by the appropriate emissions factor. The basic formula is:

  • Activity Data ร— Emission Factor = CO2e Emissions

Step 1: Calculate Electricity Emissions (Scope 2)

The company purchased 500,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity during the year. Electricity emissions depend on the local power grid. For this example, let’s use a commonly cited grid emissions factor of 0.4 kg CO2e per kWh.

The calculation for this is:ย 500,000 kWh ร— 0.4 kg CO2e/kWh = 200,000 kg CO2e.

Then convert kilograms to metric tons: 200,000 รท 1,000 = 200 tCO2e.

So, electricity emissions = 200 metric tons CO2e.

Step 2: Calculate Diesel Fuel Emissions (Scope 1)

The company consumed 100,000 liters of diesel fuel in company-owned vehicles and equipment. According to widely used emissions factors from government and GHG reporting programs, diesel combustion produces approximately 2.68 kg CO2e per liter.

The calculation is: 100,000 liters ร— 2.68 kg CO2e/liter = 268,000 kg CO2e.

Then convert to metric tons: 268,000 รท 1,000 = 268 tCO2e.

So, diesel emissions = 268 metric tons CO2e.

Step 3: Calculate Business Travel Emissions (Scope 3)

Employees traveled 500,000 miles by air during the reporting year. Air travel emissions vary depending on aircraft type, travel class, and flight distance. For this example, assume an average emissions factor of 0.24 kg CO2e per passenger mile.

The calculation is: 500,000 miles ร— 0.24 kg CO2e/mile = 120,000 kg CO2e.

Then convert to metric tons: 120,000 รท 1,000 = 120 tCO2e.

So, business travel emissions = 120 metric tons CO2e.

Step 4: Calculate Total Corporate Emissions

Now add all emissions sources together like this:

Emissions Source Emissions (tCO2e)
Electricity (Scope 2) 200
Diesel Fuel (Scope 1) 268
Air Travel (Scope 3) 120
Total 588 tCO2e

The company’s annual carbon footprint is therefore 588 metric tons of CO2e.

What Do These Numbers Tell Us?

The emissions inventory reveals where the company’s biggest climate impacts occur:

  • Diesel fuel accounts for about 46% of total emissions.
  • Electricity represents roughly 34%.
  • Business travel contributes about 20%.

This information helps management identify the most effective opportunities for reduction. For example, the company could switch diesel vehicles to electric alternatives. They can also purchase renewable electricity, improve energy efficiency, reduce unnecessary air travel, and use virtual meetings when possible.

Establishing a Baseline for Future Reductions

The first year of carbon accounting serves as a baseline.

Suppose the company reduces diesel consumption by 25% and purchases renewable electricity the following year. It can then compare its new emissions inventory against the baseline of 588 tCO2e to measure progress.

This is why carbon accounting is so valuable. It transforms sustainability goals into measurable data that companies can track, report, and improve over time.

While actual corporate inventories often include hundreds or even thousands of emissions sources, the underlying process remains the same:

  • Measure activity โ†’ Apply emissions factors โ†’ Calculate emissions โ†’ Identify reduction opportunities โ†’ Track progress year after year.

How AI is Transforming Carbon Accounting

Carbon accounting has traditionally relied on spreadsheets, invoices, utility bills, and manual calculations. Today, artificial intelligence is changing that process.

AI-powered sustainability platforms help companies automate emissions measurement, improve reporting accuracy, and analyze large amounts of environmental data.

The opportunity is significant. Research from McKinsey estimates that AI could help speed up climate mitigation efforts by improving monitoring, forecasting, and resource optimization across high-emitting sectors.ย 

Meanwhile, a joint study by the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Systemiq estimates that AI could help reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by 3.2 billion to 5.4 billion metric tons of COโ‚‚e per year by 2035 across the power, transport, and food sectors.

AI emissions reductions in power, transport, and food
Source: Stern, N. et al. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00252-3

Here’s how AI can help in carbon accounting:

Automating Data Collection

One of the biggest challenges in carbon accounting is collecting information from multiple business systems. AI can automatically gather and organize data from:

  • Enterprise resource planning systems,
  • Procurement platforms,
  • Utility invoices,
  • Travel management systems,
  • Manufacturing equipment, and
  • Supply chain databases.

This reduces manual work and improves consistency.

Improving Scope 3 Reporting

Scope 3 emissions often involve thousands of suppliers across global supply chains. When supplier-specific emissions data is not available, AI can help estimate emissions using industry benchmarks, purchasing data, economic activity information, and supplier characteristics.

This helps companies build more complete emissions inventories while encouraging suppliers to improve reporting over time.

Identifying Emissions Hotspots

Machine learning algorithms can analyze large datasets and identify the activities that produce the most emissions.

For example, AI may show that a small group of suppliers is responsible for a large share of a company’s carbon footprint. Organizations can then focus their decarbonization efforts where they can have the greatest impact.

Supporting Climate Forecasting

Companies are increasingly using AI to model future emissions pathways and evaluate different climate strategies.

These tools can help them assess net-zero roadmaps, renewable energy investments, carbon reduction opportunities, supply chain risks, and future carbon costs

Major Companies Are Embracing AI

Technology leaders such as Microsoft, Google, IBM, SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle have added AI capabilities to their sustainability and ESG management platforms. These include:

  • Microsoft Sustainability Manager,
  • SAP Sustainability Control Tower,
  • IBM Envizi, and
  • Salesforce Net Zero Cloud.

These systems help organizations automate emissions calculations, improve reporting accuracy, and generate climate-related insights.

As climate disclosure requirements continue to expand, AI is expected to play an even bigger role in corporate carbon management.

The Carbon Data Investors Want to See

For investors, carbon accounting provides valuable insight into a company’s environmental performance and long-term resilience. Emissions data helps investors assess:

  • Climate-related risks,
  • Regulatory exposure,
  • Transition preparedness,ย 
  • Operational efficiency, and
  • Long-term sustainability strategies.

Companies with transparent carbon accounting systems often give investors greater confidence in their climate commitments. This is one reason emissions disclosures have become an important part of ESG analysis.

Key Market Trends Shaping Carbon Accounting

Carbon accounting is no longer a niche market. It is becoming a major part of corporate reporting and sustainability management.

Climate Disclosure Is Going Mainstream

More than 24,800 companies disclosed environmental information through CDP in 2024. This reflects the growing importance of climate transparency across global markets.

Those disclosures were requested by more than 700 financial institutions representing over $140 trillion in assets. This highlights growing investor demand for climate-related information.

The number of reporting companies has increased sharply over the past decade and continues to rise as investor expectations evolve.

Scope 3 Emissions Are Taking Center Stage

Companies now see that much of their carbon footprint comes from activities beyond their direct operations. Thus, organizations are investing more in supplier engagement, collecting value-chain data, and improving Scope 3 reporting.

Carbon Management Software Is Growing Rapidly

The market for carbon accounting and sustainability management software will grow significantly through the end of the decade.

The global carbon management software market is projected to expand strongly through 2035, reaching over $100 billion. This growth is being driven by organizations looking for automated solutions to simplify data collection, emissions calculations, compliance reporting, and climate disclosures.

carbon accounting software market 2035

Carbon Data Is Becoming a Strategic Asset

Executives increasingly see emissions data as a business metric, not just a sustainability metric. Carbon information now influences:

  • Capital allocation,
  • Procurement decisions,
  • Risk management,ย 
  • Supply chain strategies, and
  • Corporate valuations.ย 

Companies that manage carbon data effectively may gain a competitive advantage in a rapidly changing business environment.

Carbon data is no longer used only for sustainability reporting. It also affects procurement decisions, lending practices, supply-chain partnerships, and investment evaluations.

The Obstacles to Accurate Carbon Reporting

Despite significant progress, carbon accounting remains complex. Common challenges include:

  • Data quality issues,
  • Incomplete supplier information,
  • Scope 3 measurement difficulties,ย 
  • Evolving reporting requirements, and
  • Resource constraints.

Many organizations are still developing the systems and expertise necessary for efficient emissions reporting. Fortunately, advances in technology, verification standards, and reporting frameworks are helping improve consistency and reliability.

Where Carbon Reporting Goes Next

The future of carbon accounting will likely follow a path similar to financial accounting.

Organizations will need to measure, disclose, and verify emissions data just like they do with financial information. This shift reflects a broader trend of bringing climate performance into mainstream business reporting and corporate governance.

Ultimately, carbon accounting is quickly becoming a core business capability rather than a standalone sustainability initiative. Itย is the starting point for effective climate action.

It helps organizations understand their environmental impact, identify emissions hotspots, develop reduction strategies, and communicate progress to investors and stakeholders.

In the years ahead, carbon data may become just as important to business decisions as financial data. So for organizations navigating the transition to a more sustainable future, carbon accounting is no longer optional. It is essential.