Lithium Price Trends: Why NILI Could Benefit From the New Volatility Era

Disseminated on behalf of Surge Battery Metals.

Lithium carbonate prices in China have risen close to their highest levels in years, officially passing the 200,000 CNY mark on May 12. While prices have since dropped to around 170,000 CNY per tonne or about $25,306 USD, this sharp bounce keeps lithium in a high-price bracket. This fast-moving market shows a major shift in how people view global battery metals. It proves that the industry has entered a new era of unpredictable price swings.

But this time, unlike past cycles marked by steady demand or supply shocks, the current shift is happening in a more complex setting. Pricing is getting more volatile. It reacts quickly to changes in inventory signals, procurement timing, and benchmark shifts in China โ€” the main reference point for lithium carbonate value.

The result is a market that is no longer behaving like a traditional commodity cycle. Instead, it behaves like a high-volatility pricing system adjusting to evolving long-term supply expectations.

Lithiumโ€™s New Bull Market Is Driven by Volatility, Not Stability

Lithium remains supported by strong structural demand from electric vehicles and energy storage systems. However, price behavior has shifted significantly compared to earlier cycles.

The market has shifted from slow trends based on consumption growth to quick ups and downs. Now, it moves within a tighter trading range.

Two dynamics are particularly important to note here:

  • Chinaโ€™s lithium benchmark prices are now a real-time sentiment gauge. They amplify short-term market reactions in global supply chains.
  • Supply responses vary by region, causing sporadic tightness. This only increases volatility instead of solving it.

This environment has created a market where prices depend more on expectations than just physical supply and demand. In this case, lithium is acting less like a typical industrial commodity. Instead, it resembles a strategic material that quickly adjusts its prices.

Chinaโ€™s Lithium Benchmarks Are Once Again Steering Global Markets

China is key to global lithium carbonate prices. It is a big consumer and the main processing hub for battery-grade materials at the same time.

Recent lithium carbonate price changes reaching $29,205 per tonne on May 12, 2026, multi-year highs, show this trend. Global sentiment often shifts quickly with changes in Chinese benchmark pricing.

Lithium price chart, June 3, 2026
Source: Bloomberg

Demand for electric vehicles and grid storage is strong. However, the main factor is how quickly prices respond to changes in sentiment in Chinese markets rather than to slow shifts in consumption.

This creates a feedback loop. Expectations, procurement strategies, and inventory positioning all add to short-term volatility.

Lithium Is Moving Beyond Boom-and-Bust Cycles

One of the most important developments in the lithium market is the transition away from traditional boom-and-bust cycles toward a structural pricing band with persistent volatility inside it.ย 

Earlier cycles had clear phases of growth and correction. This usually happened because supply couldn’t keep up with rising demand. That structure is becoming less predictable.

Today, lithium prices seem to be stabilizing in a higher range. However, they still show frequent and sometimes sharp movements within that range. This suggests that the market is now shaped by a combination of:

  • shifting expectations about future supply,
  • liquidity-driven price adjustments,
  • regional benchmark sensitivity, and
  • contract timing dynamics across Asia.

The result is a market where volatility is no longer an anomaly โ€” it is a defining feature.

NNLP Project: How Surge Battery Metals (NILI) Fits Into the Next Supply Cycle

Within this evolving pricing environment, Surge Battery Metals (TSX-V: NILI | OTCQX: NILIF) is increasingly positioned around its flagship Nevada North Lithium Project (NNLP). It represents the companyโ€™s core asset in the United Statesโ€™ lithium development landscape.

The NNLP project is in northeastern Nevada, an area that is crucial for critical mineral development. Its mining-friendly rules and closeness to new battery supply chains make it strategically important in North America.

Surge battery Metals NNLP upgraded resource

With lithium prices steady at high levels, projects like NNLP are becoming crucial. They are not just exploration assets; they are future supply options in a tighter global market.

The broader market shift toward sustained higher lithium pricing is also changing how early-stage projects are evaluated. Investors are increasingly focused on:

  • the long-term scalability of resource bases
  • jurisdictional stability and permitting visibility
  • alignment with North American supply chain security priorities

In this context, NNLP becomes more than a standalone development project. It shows future supply potential in a market that values flexibility more than quick production timelines.

That strategic importance has grown even more following the continued development of major Nevada lithium projects like Thacker Pass. Lithium Americas recently confirmed construction progress at Thacker Pass, with first production targeted for 2028.

Moreover, General Motors supported the project with $625 million. This investment is part of a larger joint venture and a long-term strategy for lithium supply.

NNLP

For many investors, this was a major validation moment for Nevada clay lithium. For years, sedimentary clay deposits were doubted. This was mainly because only a few projects reached commercial-scale production. Thacker Pass moving into construction helped reduce that uncertainty and increased attention on nearby and similar lithium clay assets across Nevada.

This broader shift has helped bring more focus to Surge Battery Metalsโ€™ Nevada North Lithium Project. The company reported an updated resource of 10.5 million tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent (Measured & Indicated), grading 3,007 ppm lithium, including a high-grade subset of 6.7 million tonnes LCE at 3,820 ppm lithium.ย 

NILi upgraded resource
Source: Surge Battery Metals

The project benefits from Nevadaโ€™s mining infrastructure. Its location is in one of Americaโ€™s fastest-growing battery material areas. And with prices high and volatility ongoing, undeveloped domestic lithium assets are becoming more strategically important.

Rising Lithium Demand Is Shifting Attention Toward Future Supply Assets

For Surge Battery Metals (NILI), the current lithium market is not just about short-term price moves. It reflects a longer shift in how the market values future supply.

Lithium demand continues to grow strongly. The International Energy Agency (IEA) expects lithium demand to rise several times over by 2030, mainly driven by electric vehicles and battery storage.

lithium demand by use 2030

At the same time, supply is still highly concentrated. China remains a major hub for lithium processing and battery-grade material production. This makes global pricing more sensitive to Chinese benchmark movements.

Because of this, investors are looking beyond current production. They are focusing more on future supply sources that can support long-term demand growth.

This is where NNLP becomes important. The project is located in one of the key lithium regions in the United States. The U.S. government is also pushing to secure more domestic critical mineral supply for the energy and battery industries.

As lithium prices stay high compared to long-term averages, early-stage projects like NNLP gain more attention. They represent future supply in a market where demand is expected to keep rising for years.

Lithium Enters a High-Volatility Structural Phase

The latest move in Chinaโ€™s lithium carbonate price, about $29,500 per tonne, shows more than a simple price increase. It reflects a deeper change in the market.

Lithium is no longer moving in simple boom-and-bust cycles. Instead, it is now trading in a higher and more unstable price range.

For Surge Battery Metals (NILI), this shift is important. The NNLP project becomes more relevant as the market looks for new long-term lithium supply sources.

Overall, lithium is now in a phase where future supply matters as much as current production. This supports long-term interest in early-stage developers as the market adjusts to a tighter and more volatile pricing environment.


DISCLAIMER

New Era Publishing Inc. and/or CarbonCredits.com (โ€œWeโ€ or โ€œUsโ€) are not securities dealers or brokers, investment advisers, or financial advisers, and you should not rely on the information herein as investment advice. Surge Battery Metals Inc. (โ€œCompanyโ€) made a one-time payment of $75,000 to provide marketing services for a term of three months. None of the owners, members, directors, or employees of New Era Publishing Inc. and/or CarbonCredits.com currently hold, or have any beneficial ownership in, any shares, stocks, or options of the companies mentioned.

This article is informational only and is solely for use by prospective investors in determining whether to seek additional information. It does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Examples that we provide of share price increases pertaining to a particular issuer from one referenced date to another represent arbitrarily chosen time periods and are no indication whatsoever of future stock prices for that issuer and are of no predictive value.

Our stock profiles are intended to highlight certain companies for your further investigation; they are not stock recommendations or an offer or sale of the referenced securities. The securities issued by the companies we profile should be considered high-risk; if you do invest despite these warnings, you may lose your entire investment. Please do your own research before investing, including reviewing the companiesโ€™ SEDAR+ and SEC filings, press releases, and risk disclosures.

It is our policy that information contained in this profile was provided by the company, extracted from SEDAR+ and SEC filings, company websites, and other publicly available sources. We believe the sources and information are accurate and reliable but we cannot guarantee them.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT AND FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain statements contained in this news release may constitute โ€œforward-looking informationโ€ within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking information generally can be identified by words such as โ€œanticipate,โ€ โ€œexpect,โ€ โ€œestimate,โ€ โ€œforecast,โ€ โ€œplan,โ€ and similar expressions suggesting future outcomes or events. Forward-looking information is based on current expectations of management; however, it is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated.

These factors include, without limitation, statements relating to the Companyโ€™s exploration and development plans, the potential of its mineral projects, financing activities, regulatory approvals, market conditions, and future objectives. Forward-looking information involves numerous risks and uncertainties and actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking information. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, market volatility, the state of financial markets for the Companyโ€™s securities, fluctuations in commodity prices, operational challenges, and changes in business plans.

Forward-looking information is based on several key expectations and assumptions, including, without limitation, that the Company will continue with its stated business objectives and will be able to raise additional capital as required. Although management of the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated, or intended.

There can be no assurance that such forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Additional information about risks and uncertainties is contained in the Companyโ€™s managementโ€™s discussion and analysis and annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2025, copies of which are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

The forward-looking information contained herein is expressly qualified in its entirety by this cautionary statement. Forward-looking information reflects managementโ€™s current beliefs and is based on information currently available to the Company. The forward-looking information is made as of the date of this news release, and the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise such information to reflect new events or circumstances except as may be required by applicable law.

Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: None.

Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.


Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: None.

Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.

Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.

Surge Battery Metals (NILI) Upgrades Nevada North to 10.5 Mt LCE M&I Resource as U.S. Lithium Development Gains Momentum

Disseminated on behalf of Surge Battery Metals Inc.ย 

Surge Battery Metals has announced a major resource upgrade at its flagship Nevada North Lithium Project (NNLP). This boosts the companyโ€™s position in the growing U.S. lithium supply chain race.

The updated mineral resource estimate outlines 657.4 million tonnes grading 3,007 ppm lithium, containing 10.5 million tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) in the Measured and Indicated category. The estimate also includes 6.7 million tonnes LCE grading 3,820 ppm lithium, highlighting the projectโ€™s high-grade core zones.

The new figures mark a major step forward for NNLP as the project moves from exploration success toward development-stage validation. The upgrade also comes as the United States pushes to expand domestic lithium supply to support electric vehicles, battery manufacturing, and energy storage growth.

NILI updated MRE
Source: Surge Battery Metals

Mr. Greg Reimer, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Surge, stated,

โ€œThis resource update is a watershed moment for Surge and our joint venture partners at Evolution Mining. Delivering over 10.5 million tonnes of LCE into the Measured and Indicated category at grades exceeding 3,000 ppm Li underscores the significance of the NNLP deposit. This MRE highlights the sheer scalability of the NNLP with the PEA mine plan only using 3.6Mt of the M&I resource. The primary objective of this MRE update was to de-risk the resource for the Pre-Feasibility Study, and the geological data has emphatically delivered.โ€

Resource Confidence Improves as More Material Moves Into M&I Category

One of the most important parts of the update is the sharp increase in Measured and Indicated resources, often referred to as the M&I category.

Measured and Indicated resources carry higher geological confidence than inferred resources. They are more useful for mine planning, engineering studies, financing, and future permitting work.

The company reports that 87% of the material in the current Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) pit shell is now in the M&I category. This is an important milestone because it reduces uncertainty around the existing mine plan.

surge battery metals updated resource
Source: Surge Battery Metals

The new estimate includes an additional 3.1 million tonnes LCE in the inferred category. This allows for future growth and more drilling potential.

NNLP Resource Far Exceeds Current PEA Mine Plan

Another key takeaway from the resource update is the scale difference between the current mine plan and the overall resource base. The companyโ€™s existing PEA uses only about:

  • 3.6 million tonnes LCE grading 4,016 ppm lithium
  • compared to the newly updated 10.5 million tonnes LCE M&I resource

This suggests the project may support a much larger operation or a longer mine life than originally modeled. The PEA released earlier by the company outlined:

  • an after-tax net present value (NPV8) of about US$9.17 billion
  • an after-tax internal rate of return (IRR) of 22.8%
  • estimated operating costs of around US$5,243 per tonne LCE
Surge Measured and Indicated resource compared with PEA
Source: Surge Battery Metals

Those economics helped position NNLP as one of the more closely watched lithium clay projects in the United States.

High Grades Continue to Stand Out Among U.S. Clay Lithium Projects

Grade remains one of NNLPโ€™s strongest differentiators.

The updated resource maintains lithium grades above 3,000 ppm across large portions of the deposit, while some zones exceed 3,800 ppm lithium. These grades compare favorably with several other U.S. lithium clay projects currently under development.

Higher-grade deposits can offer important advantages, including:

  • more lithium produced per tonne mined,ย 
  • potentially lower processing costs, and
  • improved project economics over time.

The projectโ€™s location in Nevada also adds to its strategic relevance. Nevada is now one of the most important lithium regions in North America as automakers and battery companies look for domestic supply sources.

New Drilling and Geological Modeling Strengthen Confidence in NNLP Resource

The updated resource estimate comes from a major drilling and geological modeling program done at the NNLP deposit.

The 2025 infill and step-out campaign involved nine drill holes totaling 4,634.5 feet (1,412.6 meters). This work supported the updated Mineral Resource Estimate.

Engineering firm RESPEC used drilling data and 3D geological models prepared by the company to identify and estimate lithium-bearing clay zones in the project area.

The process included:

  • statistical analysis of lithium grades within key clay units
  • geostatistical modeling to improve estimation confidence
  • construction of a large block model to map lithium distribution throughout the deposit

The lithium grades were interpolated into a block model, which used 50-meter by 50-meter horizontal blocks and 5-meter vertical intervals. This method improved understanding of the deposit’s size, continuity, and grade distribution. The company also outlined several areas that could support future resource growth and grade improvements.

One opportunity comes from tighter drill spacing in areas with lower drill density. Surge believes additional infill drilling could improve grade estimates in these zones, similar to results seen in the recent infill program.

The company also plans to expand its higher-grade lithium footprint, where zones grading above 3,000 ppm lithium remain open to the south and east of the basin.ย 

Also, new high-resolution topographic surveys found shallow areas. These spots could lead to more tonnage growth, especially in the northeast part of the project. These findings show that NNLP can grow beyond the current resource model. This is possible as drilling and engineering work keep progressing.

PFS Work Advances as Surge Pushes Toward Development

Surge Battery Metals is now advancing work toward a Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS), targeted for completion in the fourth quarter of 2026.

The company also continues to benefit from its partnership with Evolution Mining, which entered a joint venture with Surge and committed up to C$10 million to fund the Pre-Feasibility Study.

The combination of the following helps strengthen NNLPโ€™s position as it moves further along the development path:

  • a larger M&I resource,
  • strong lithium grades,
  • positive PEA economics, and
  • growing regional validation in Nevada.

Nevada Lithium Gains More Attention as Thacker Pass Advances

The broader Nevada lithium sector has gained momentum following major investments and development activity in the region.

Lithium Americasโ€™ Thacker Pass project continues moving toward production. This helps validate Nevada clay lithium as a commercially viable resource. General Motors also committed roughly $625 million to support the project, marking one of the largest automaker investments ever made in a U.S. lithium development project.

That progress matters for companies like Surge Battery Metals because it helps reduce concerns about developing clay-hosted lithium deposits in Nevada.

As more infrastructure, processing knowledge, and investment move into the region, nearby and next-generation projects such as NNLP may benefit from growing industry confidence.

NNLP Emerges as a Key U.S. Lithium Growth Asset

The latest resource upgrade marks an important milestone for Surge Battery Metals (NILI) and its Nevada North Lithium Project.

By significantly increasing higher-confidence Measured and Indicated resources, the company has strengthened the projectโ€™s development profile while also highlighting the larger long-term scale potential of NNLP.

At the same time, growing U.S. interest in domestic lithium supply continues to support Nevadaโ€™s importance in the North American battery supply chain.

As lithium demand rises and new supply becomes increasingly important, projects that combine scale, grade, and improved development confidence are likely to remain in focus across the sector.

DISCLAIMERย 

New Era Publishing Inc. and/or CarbonCredits.com (โ€œWeโ€ or โ€œUsโ€) are not securities dealers or brokers, investment advisers, or financial advisers, and you should not rely on the information herein as investment advice. Surge Battery Metals Inc. (โ€œCompanyโ€) made a one-time payment of $75,000 to provide marketing services for a term of two months. None of the owners, members, directors, or employees of New Era Publishing Inc. and/or CarbonCredits.com currently hold, or have any beneficial ownership in, any shares, stocks, or options of the companies mentioned.

This article is informational only and is solely for use by prospective investors in determining whether to seek additional information. It does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Examples that we provide of share price increases pertaining to a particular issuer from one referenced date to another represent arbitrarily chosen time periods and are no indication whatsoever of future stock prices for that issuer, and are of no predictive value.

Our stock profiles are intended to highlight certain companies for your further investigation; they are not stock recommendations or an offer or sale of the referenced securities. The securities issued by the companies we profile should be considered high-risk; if you do invest despite these warnings, you may lose your entire investment. Please do your own research before investing, including reviewing the companiesโ€™ SEDAR+ and SEC filings, press releases, and risk disclosures.

It is our policy that the information contained in this profile was provided by the company, extracted from SEDAR+ and SEC filings, company websites, and other publicly available sources. We believe the sources and information are accurate and reliable, but we cannot guarantee them.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT AND FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain statements contained in this news release may constitute โ€œforward-looking informationโ€ within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking information generally can be identified by words such as โ€œanticipate,โ€ โ€œexpect,โ€ โ€œestimate,โ€ โ€œforecast,โ€ โ€œplan,โ€ and similar expressions suggesting future outcomes or events. Forward-looking information is based on current expectations of management; however, it is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated.

These factors include, without limitation, statements relating to the Companyโ€™s exploration and development plans, the potential of its mineral projects, financing activities, regulatory approvals, market conditions, and future objectives. Forward-looking information involves numerous risks and uncertainties and actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking information. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, market volatility, the state of financial markets for the Companyโ€™s securities, fluctuations in commodity prices, operational challenges, and changes in business plans.

Forward-looking information is based on several key expectations and assumptions, including, without limitation, that the Company will continue with its stated business objectives and will be able to raise additional capital as required. Although management of the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated, or intended.

There can be no assurance that such forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Additional information about risks and uncertainties is contained in the Companyโ€™s managementโ€™s discussion and analysis and annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2024, copies of which are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

The forward-looking information contained herein is expressly qualified in its entirety by this cautionary statement. Forward-looking information reflects managementโ€™s current beliefs and is based on information currently available to the Company. The forward-looking information is made as of the date of this news release, and the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise such information to reflect new events or circumstances except as may be required by applicable law.


Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: None.

Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.

Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.

London’s Gatwick Airport Uses Nature-Based Solutions to Offset 10,000 Tonnes of Emissions

Gatwick Airport Limited (GAL) is enhancing its climate efforts by investing in nature-based carbon removal projects across England. The airport has teamed up with Kent Wildlife Trust and Somerset Wildlife Trust to restore damaged land and lower carbon emissions that can’t yet be eliminated from its operations.

This initiative builds on Gatwickโ€™s long-standing commitment to sustainability and biodiversity. The airport has earned the Wildlife Trust Biodiversity Benchmark for 11 consecutive years, making it a leader in environmental management among UK airports.

Gatwick Invests ยฃ1 Million in Nature Projects

The press release says that GAL has dedicated ยฃ1 million to two environmental projects supported by Wilder Carbon, a non-profit that connects companies with wildlife restoration efforts.

  • This funding will help remove around 10,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) from the air. The projects are located at Ironhurst Valley Nature Reserve in Kent and Honeygar Farm in Somerset.

Both sites, once farmland, will be transformed into rich habitats in the coming years. These projects aim to capture carbon and enhance biodiversity, soil quality, flood management, and local ecosystems.

At Ironhurst Valley, land will shift from farming to a blend of wet floodplain meadows, grasslands, and mixed woodland. This change will create healthier ecosystems and store more carbon.

GAL stated that the carbon removed through these projects will offset emissions generated between 2030 and 2039. These emissions can’t be fully eliminated due to current technological limitations.

Nature-Based Solutions Become Part of Net-Zero Plans

The airport is lowering emissions through infrastructure upgrades and cleaner operations. However, some emissions will likely remain after 2030.

Mark Edwards, Head of Sustainability at Gatwick, said:

โ€œWe have an unwavering commitment to sustainability and to achieving our aim of being net zero for emissions under our direct control by 2030. We are making great progress, as detailed in ourย ย 2025 Sustainability Reportย . ย 

โ€œWe are doing all we can to reduce our carbon footprint but come 2030 a small proportion of greenhouse gas emissions will remain. We wonโ€™t be able to eradicate these emission sources for various reasons such as the technology not yet existing. ย 

โ€œIn order to achieve Net Zero, we will need to remove these residual emissions.ย 

โ€œCollaborating with Wilder Carbon offered us the opportunity to support local,ย ย high integrityย , nature-based projects that offered considerable benefits in addition to carbon removal.ย 

โ€œWe carefully considered which projects to partner with and Iโ€™m delighted that Ironhurst is so close to the airport. Iโ€™m excited to see how nature will transform Ironhurst and Honeygar over the coming years as our partnership progresses.ย Our thanks go to the Wilder Carbon team for helping us find our partner sites, and to the two Trusts.โ€ย 

The Ironhurst Valley project is especially welcomed because of its proximity to Gatwick. Edwards is eager to see nature recover at both sites in the coming years.

GATWICK AIPORT NET Zero
Source: Gatwick

Gatwickโ€™s Bigger Sustainability Strategy

The wildlife partnerships are part of Gatwickโ€™s broader โ€œDecade of Changeโ€ sustainability plan.

  • In 2023, the airport advanced its net-zero target for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions from 2040 to 2030. To support this quicker timeline, GAL launched a ยฃ250 million decarbonization investment program.
  • So far, the airport has reduced Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions by over 73% compared to its 1990 baseline.

The latest 2025 Sustainability Report highlights several major achievements.

One significant project involves replacing natural gas boilers across the airport. Initial work is set to begin in 2026. Gatwick also lowered emissions from heating systems by reducing temperatures and optimizing operations.

  • The company reported a 35% reduction in Scope 1 emissions from natural gas use since 2019.

Meanwhile, Gatwick has continued to purchase 100% renewable electricity for the twelfth year in a row.

The airport also completed a strategic electrical power study to prepare for its long-term net-zero transition. This will support future renewable energy systems and expanded EV charging infrastructure.

gatwick carbon emissions
Source: Gatwick

Electric Vehicles and Cleaner Transport

Transport electrification is another key area for Gatwick. Last year, theย airport received 48 electric vehicles, with another 25 on order. It also opened two new EV charging stations for operational vehicles.

Gatwick expanded its electric public transport fleet, with four of the 14 electric buses already delivered. These buses will transport passengers between terminals and long-stay parking areas.

The airport believes cleaner transport systems will significantly lower emissions from ground operations in the coming years.

Biodiversity Efforts Go Beyond Carbon

Gatwickโ€™s environmental strategy includes strong biodiversity protection and ecological restoration. In 2025, the airport conducted 25 ecological surveys, including a first earthworm survey and mapping of veteran trees.

  • It resumed its annual wildlife recording day with the Gatwick Greenspace Partnership, local ecologists, volunteers, and the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre. The event recorded 202 species, including a fungi species called Lophiostoma caespitosum, identified for the first time in Great Britain.
  • The airport is also replacing herbicides with alternative weed management methods in landside areas. Instead of chemicals, teams are using manual sweeping and hot lance equipment.

Gatwick published its second Biodiversity Action Plan Review Report, showing ongoing progress in maintaining and enhancing biodiversity areas.

Together with the Gatwick Greenspace Partnership, the airport hosted 65 volunteering events and 49 education events during the year.

These initiatives support Gatwickโ€™s goal of achieving a โ€œsector-leadingโ€ biodiversity net gain strategy while eliminating herbicide use by 2030.

Recycling Projects Add to Sustainability Goals

Beyond emissions and biodiversity, Gatwick expanded community and circular economy initiatives in 2025.

The airport created the UKโ€™s first recycling facility on-site. It focuses on airline cabin waste that is not contaminated. This project aims to improve recycling rates and reduce landfill waste.

gatwick sustainability biodiversity
Source: Gatwick

Sustainable Aviation Industry Joins Carbon Removal Push

Gatwick collaborates with the wider aviation industry to support long-term climate solutions. The airport is part of Sustainable Aviation, a coalition that includes airlines, airports, aerospace companies, and fuel producers focused on achieving net-zero aviation emissions.

Earlier this year, the coalition launched an Advanced Market Signal initiative for greenhouse gas removals. Through this commitment, members will invest over ยฃ2 million in greenhouse gas removal credits to speed up the carbon removal market.

This growing interest shows how aviation companies are linking direct emissions cuts with long-term carbon removal strategies.

As we see, the airport is making significant investments in clean energy, electrification, biodiversity restoration, and carbon removal. This shows its commitment to leading sustainability in the UK’s aviation sector.

In conclusion, Gatwickโ€™s projects highlight that nature restoration and carbon removal are key to long-term climate strategies. While challenges remain for aviation decarbonization, these efforts are crucial.

World Cup 2026: How Stadiums Move Beyond Sports Venues and Turn Into Clean Energy Hubs for the Grid

The 2026 FIFA World Cup is a global sports event that is becoming a large-scale test of clean energy use in public infrastructure. A key feature of the tournament is the energy design of its stadiums.

Out of the 16 World Cup 2026 host stadiums, 13 are already powered by clean energy through a mix of on-site solar generation, renewable energy credits, clean electricity grids, and renewable power procurement arrangements.

With this, more than 80% of the stadiums are already connected to clean energy systems. This data shows how sports infrastructure is increasingly becoming part of the energy transition.

This marks a shift in how major sports venues operate. Stadiums are no longer just places for games. They are becoming connected parts of local power systems.

Clean Energy Integration Through Stadium Design

In many host cities, energy planning is now part of event preparation. Local authorities and organizers are pushing for lower emissions through energy efficiency rules, cleaner electricity sourcing, and long-term sustainability requirements.

Some stadiums are even targeting 100% renewable electricity during World Cup operations, depending on grid access and contract structures. This reflects a broader trend. Large venues are starting to act as โ€œdistributed clean-energy hubsโ€ that interact directly with electricity grids.

Modern stadiums consume large amounts of energy. Lighting, cooling systems, broadcasting equipment, and crowd services all require a constant electricity supply.

To reduce emissions, many 2026 World Cup venues are integrating renewable energy in two main ways.

  • The first is on-site generation. Some stadiums are installing solar panels on roofs and surrounding facilities. These systems help reduce reliance on fossil-fuel-based grid electricity during peak hours.
  • The second is renewable energy procurement. Stadium operators are signing long-term contracts called power purchase agreements. These agreements let them buy electricity directly from wind and solar projects. This helps match stadium demand with clean energy supply on a yearly or hourly basis.

Together, these approaches reduce the carbon footprint of stadium operations. They also help stabilize energy costs over time.

Energy efficiency upgrades are another key part of stadium design. Host cities are introducing stricter building standards for cooling systems, lighting efficiency, and smart energy management systems. These upgrades reduce total electricity demand, not just emissions intensity.

Host Cities Push Low-Carbon Infrastructure Standardsย 

The clean energy transition in stadiums is not happening by chance. It is being shaped by host city policies and infrastructure requirements.

Across the United States, Canada, and Mexico, World Cup host cities are incorporating climate targets into event planning. These include requirements for energy-efficient buildings, renewable electricity sourcing, and emissions tracking systems.

This is already visible in how specific stadiums are being integrated into city-level sustainability systems:

  • BC Place Stadium (Vancouver) operates under British Columbiaโ€™s clean electricity grid dominated by hydropower. It aligns stadium operations with provincial decarbonization policy.
  • Mercedes-Benz Stadium (Atlanta) is widely recognized for its LEED Platinum certification and on-site solar generation. This reflects city-scale sustainability ambition.
  • Levi’s Stadium (Santa Clara) is embedded in Californiaโ€™s renewable energy mandates and Silicon Valleyโ€™s broader clean-tech infrastructure ecosystem.
  • Estadio BBVA (Monterrey) is aligned with regional efficiency upgrades and modern stadium energy systems tied to municipal development planning.

In some cases, stadium upgrades are tied to long-term city climate goals rather than the tournament alone. This means infrastructure improvements are expected to remain in place long after the World Cup ends.

For example:

  • Lincoln Financial Field (Philadelphia) has long operated with large-scale solar integration and energy efficiency retrofits aligned with the cityโ€™s emissions reduction strategy.
  • Estadio Akron (Guadalajara) reflects Mexicoโ€™s growing integration of efficiency upgrades in major sports infrastructure planning.

Some venues are joining the city’s clean energy programs. These programs aim to boost renewable electricity access in urban areas. They connect stadium energy needs with larger energy transition plans. The image below shows how the 16 stadiums operate and the ones with installed solar on-site.

world cup 2026 stadium clen energy
Sources: Green Sports Alliance – 2026 FIFA World Cup Stadium Report, and public stadium disclosures

When Stadiums Start Working With the Grid

One of the most important shifts in the 2026 World Cup is how stadiums interact with the power grid. Traditionally, stadiums were passive consumers of electricity. They drew power without influencing supply systems.

Now this model is changing.

According to the Canal Solar dataset, several host venues are already operating as active or semi-active energy participants, not just consumers:

  • BC Place Stadium uses a grid mix that benefits from low-carbon electricity, effectively reducing its operational emissions footprint without requiring full on-site generation.
  • Mercedes-Benz Stadium integrates on-site solar generation and energy-efficient systems that allow it to offset a meaningful share of peak demand.
  • Estadio BBVA represents a newer generation of stadium design where energy systems are optimized for efficiency and lower grid dependency.
  • Lumen Field (Seattle) is part of a regional grid where renewable electricity penetration is increasing, enabling more flexible low-carbon operations.

Some stadiums are starting to use smart energy systems. These systems help keep the grid stable by managing demand and optimizing efficiency. While not all World Cup venues currently use large-scale storage, the trend is clearly moving in that direction.

  • This creates a new role for stadiums: instead of only consuming electricity, they are beginning to behave like grid-linked clean energy assets.

This shift matters. Electricity systems in North America face pressure from electrification, data centers, and cooling needs. Flexible stadium loads help reduce stress on the system while reinforcing municipal decarbonization goals.

Clean Power Helps, But Itโ€™s Only Part of the Climate Equation

The use of renewable electricity in stadiums helps reduce operational emissions. However, it only covers part of the World Cupโ€™s total footprint.ย 

Most emissions from large sporting events come from transportation, construction materials, and supply chains. Stadium energy use is only one piece of the total system.

FIFA world cup 2026 carbon footprint
Source: FIFA World Cup 2026 Bid Book

Still, stadium decarbonization plays an important signaling role. It shows how clean electricity can be integrated into high-demand public infrastructure.

Event planning data shows that major sports venues usually produce fewer emissions than travel and logistics. This means stadium upgrades alone cannot make the World Cup fully low-carbon.

However, they can reduce baseline emissions and demonstrate scalable solutions for other large infrastructure projects. This is especially relevant for cities planning future events. Stadium energy systems can serve as prototypes for airports, convention centers, and urban transport hubs.

A Model for Future Infrastructure Transition

The 2026 World Cup is highlighting a new role for stadiums in the global energy transition. With most venues powered by renewable electricity, stadiums are evolving from passive consumers into active participants in energy systems.

They are becoming connected to grids, linked to clean energy contracts, and shaped by city-level climate policies. This shift does not eliminate the broader environmental impact of mega-events. But it does show how infrastructure design can reduce emissions at the operational level.

More importantly, it signals a longer-term change. Stadiums are no longer just sports venues. They are becoming part of the clean energy infrastructure that supports modern cities. As global electricity demand continues to rise, this model may become more common far beyond the World Cup.

Googleโ€™s 200 MW Solar Deal in Oklahoma Highlights the Growing Energy Cost of AI

Google has signed a 15-year agreement to purchase 200 megawatts (MW) of solar power from the Solstice Solar project in Oklahoma, developed by Enlight Renewable Energy.

The project will supply clean electricity to support Google’s growing data center operations in the region. The facility is planned as a 250 MWdc solar project and could eventually include 800 megawatt-hours (MWh) of battery storage.

Driving a New Wave of Electricity Demand

The agreement is about more than adding another renewable energy asset. It reflects a challenge facing the entire technology sector: how to power the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) while still meeting climate goals.

Across the industry, electricity demand is rising at a pace not seen in years. Data centers are expanding, AI workloads are becoming more energy intensive, and utilities are scrambling to add new generating capacity. In response, technology companies are signing larger and longer renewable energy contracts to secure future power supplies.

The Oklahoma deal is one example of how that shift is reshaping energy markets. AI is changing how much electricity technology companies need.

Google reported that electricity consumption at its data centers increased by 27% in 2024 compared with the previous year. The increase was largely driven by AI-related computing demand.

The company has also acknowledged the climate impact of this growth. Google reported greenhouse gas emissions of 11.5 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (COโ‚‚e) in 2024. That is 51% higher than its 2019 baseline.

google emissions
Source: GOOGLE

The challenge becomes more common across the sector. New AI models require large clusters of advanced chips operating around the clock. These facilities consume far more electricity than traditional computing workloads.

The impact is already visible at the grid level. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), global electricity demand from data centers could more than double by 2030. AI is expected to be the largest driver of that increase.

In the United States, utilities and grid operators are preparing for a sharp rise in demand. The Southwest Power Pool (SPP), which serves Oklahoma and several neighboring states, expects peak electricity demand to increase by nearly 5 gigawatts between 2026 and 2029. During the same period, more than 5.7 GW of existing power generation is expected to retire.

This means new sources of electricity will be needed quickly. Solar energy is emerging as one of the fastest solutions.

Google Is Betting on Carbon-Free Energy, Not Just Renewable Credits

Despite growing energy demand, Google says its climate commitments remain unchanged.

In May 2026, company executives reaffirmed that Google’s goal of operating on 24/7 carbon-free energy by 2030 remains intact. The target was first announced by CEO Sundar Pichai in 2020 and remains one of the most ambitious energy goals in the corporate world.

Unlike traditional renewable energy programs, Google’s approach goes beyond annual energy matching.

Google carbon-free energy goal 2030
Source: Google

Many companies purchase enough renewable electricity to offset their yearly power consumption. Google’s goal is harder. It aims to match every hour of electricity use with locally sourced carbon-free electricity.

This distinction matters because solar power is available mainly during daylight hours, while data centers operate continuously.

According to Google, carbon-free energy supplied 66% of the electricity consumed across its global operations in 2024. The company aims to continue increasing that figure throughout the decade.

To support this effort, Google has become one of the world’s largest corporate clean energy buyers. Since 2010, the company has signed agreements for more than 22 gigawatts of renewable energy generation capacity globally.

The Oklahoma agreement adds another piece to that portfolio.

Solar Is Becoming a Critical Tool for Industrial Decarbonization

The rise of corporate solar procurement extends far beyond the technology sector. Solar energy has become one of the fastest-growing sources of electricity in the world. Costs have fallen sharply over the past decade, making utility-scale solar one of the lowest-cost options for new power generation in many markets.

In the United States, solar accounted for a record 43.2 GW of new capacity installations in 2024. According to the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and Wood Mackenzie, this represented about 84% of all new electricity-generating capacity added during the year.

US electricity generation 2026 by source solar EIA

Renewables as a whole accounted for more than 90% of new generating capacity additions. The trend is expected to continue. SEIA forecasts total U.S. solar capacity could reach 739 GW by 2035, more than triple current levels.

This growth is becoming increasingly important for corporate decarbonization efforts.

Many industries are electrifying operations to reduce emissions. Manufacturers are replacing fossil fuel equipment with electric systems. Mining companies are increasing their use of renewable energy, as Rio Tinto’s renewable deal shows. Transportation firms are expanding electric vehicle fleets. Data centers are consuming more power than ever.

All of these trends increase demand for clean electricity. As a result, renewable energy is becoming a central part of net-zero strategies across the global economy.

Tech Giants Are No Longer Buying Powerโ€”Theyโ€™re Building the Grid

Google’s Oklahoma agreement reflects a broader change in how companies think about energy.

In the past, corporations purchased electricity from utilities and treated energy as a routine operating expense. Today, large energy users are helping finance the construction of new generation assets.

Long-term power purchase agreements provide stable revenue for developers while giving companies access to future electricity supplies. This model is becoming increasingly important as AI expands.

Google has already committed about $9 billion toward cloud and AI infrastructure investments in Oklahoma. The company has also supported more than 700 MW of solar capacity in the state before this latest agreement.

The new contract strengthens both objectives. It helps Google secure electricity for future growth while supporting the development of additional clean energy infrastructure.

For developers such as Enlight Renewable Energy, these agreements create long-term certainty that can support financing and project construction. For the broader energy sector, they signal a larger transformation.

The 200 MW Oklahoma solar project is only one facility. Yet, it reflects a growing reality. As AI drives electricity demand higher, technology companies are becoming active participants in building the energy systems that will power the next phase of the digital economy.

Rio Tintoโ€™s $1.5 Billion AP60 Expansion Boosts Low-Carbon Aluminum Production in Canada

The aluminum industry faces pressure to cut emissions while meeting the growing demand from electric vehicles, renewable energy, and consumer electronics. In this setting, Rio Tinto has achieved an important milestone in its low-carbon aluminum efforts.

The mining giant has started commissioning its $1.5 billion AP60 smelter expansion at the Arvida complex in Quebec, Canada. This project is one of Rio Tinto’s biggest investments in advanced aluminum production technology. It shows the company’s commitment to cutting emissions while boosting output.

The startup process began in March and will continue until late 2026. When complete, all 96 new AP60 pots will be operational, greatly expanding production capacity and solidifying Rio Tintoโ€™s position in North America.

AP60 Expansion: A Major Step Forward for Low-Carbon Aluminum

Developed by Rio Tinto’s research teams, AP60 is one of the most efficient aluminum smelting technologies today. It boosts productivity while reducing energy use and emissions.

The press release says:

  • The AP60 expansion will add about 160,000 metric tonnes of primary aluminum production each year.
  • This raises the total output from AP60 technology to around 220,000 metric tonnes annually.

Aluminum is key in many industries. It is lightweight, durable, and can be recycled without losing quality. As industries move toward cleaner technologies, the demand for aluminum grows. It is essential for electric vehicles, solar panels, aircraft, and packaging.

Rio Tinto believes the AP60 expansion will meet this rising demand while lowering the environmental impact of aluminum production.

Furthermore, the project will offset production losses from older potrooms at Arvida. These potrooms will close by June for more efficient operations.

Cleaner Technology with Lower Emissions

AP60 technology offers notable environmental benefits.

Using Quebecโ€™s hydropower, AP60 produces much lower emissions than usual for aluminum production.

  • Aluminum made with AP60 emits about one-sixth of the greenhouse gases compared to the global average.
  • It also produces about half the emissions of older technologies at the Arvida smelter.

Rio Tinto also expects AP60 to lower fine particulate emissions by up to 90%. This will help improve local air quality.

Claude Vanvoren, Rio Tinto’s Vice President of Technology and Research, noted the strong performance of AP60 cells last year. He highlighted design improvements that led to record-low emissions and enhanced productivity.

rio tinto aluminum emission
Source: Rio Tinto

Economic Benefits for Quebec

Rio Tinto estimates the project will directly support about 100 permanent jobs in the region and maintain employment across its broader supply chain.

During construction, the project generated significant economic activity. At peak times, over 1,500 workers were on-site. Rio Tinto estimates it delivered over $1 billion in benefits to Quebec through spending on contractors, suppliers, and local services.

This investment strengthens Rio Tinto’s long-standing presence in the province and reinforces Quebec’s role in low-carbon aluminum production.

Supporting the Future of Carbon-Free Aluminum

As per the Aluminum Climate Impact 2025 report:

“The global aluminum industry is responsible for about 2% of total carbon dioxide (COโ‚‚) emissions worldwide. Between 2000 and 2024, global aluminum production more than doubled, driven largely by China, which produced 59% of the worldโ€™s aluminum in 2024.”

aluminum
Source: International Aluminium Institute

The AP60 project also sets the stage for more advanced aluminum technologies. Rio Tinto is a partner in ELYSIS, an initiative focused on eliminating greenhouse gas emissions from aluminum smelting.

Traditional aluminum production uses carbon anodes that release carbon dioxide. ELYSIS aims to replace these with technology that produces oxygen instead of emissions.

A demonstration plant is being developed in Quebec with support from the Canadian and Quebec provincial governments. This technology could transform aluminum manufacturing and significantly cut the industry’s carbon footprint.

The AP60 expansion lays the groundwork for this future transition, promoting cleaner production methods while new technologies are developed.

Climate Challenges and Growing Opportunities

Like many companies, Rio Tinto faces pressure from rising carbon costs and climate regulations.

The company expects higher carbon-related expenses in areas where aluminum production still relies on fossil fuels, especially in parts of Eastern Australia. These costs will likely rise as governments tighten climate policies.

At the same time, demand for low-carbon aluminum is set to grow.

Rio Tinto believes markets, particularly in Europe, will increasingly favor products with lower carbon footprints. The company’s hydropower-powered aluminum operations in Canada and planned decarbonization projects in Australia are well-positioned for this trend.

By 2050, demand for low-carbon aluminum could be nearly 1.8 times higher under certain climate scenarios. More ambitious global climate policies could push demand even higher.

Aluminum has already made a significant contribution to Rio Tinto’s earnings. From 2019 to 2023, it accounted for about 11% of group EBITDA. The company expects aluminum’s contribution to rise to around 15% by 2033 as it diversifies and expands production.

A Clear Roadmap Toward Net-Zero Operations by 2050

Rio Tinto has made climate action central to its long-term strategy.

The companyโ€™s updated Climate Action Plan supports the global energy transition and aims to cut emissions in its operations.

  • In 2025, Rio Tinto reported gross Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions of 31.5 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent, a reduction of 0.2 million tonnes from the year before.

Since 2018, the company has cut operational emissions by 14%. After accounting for high-quality carbon offsets, net emissions are now 17% below the baseline.

Several initiatives have helped achieve these reductions, including renewable energy contracts and investments in cleaner technologies.

rio tinto emissions
Source: Rio Tinto

Managing Environmental Risks

The company closely monitors several hazardous emissions, including sulfur oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate matter like PM10 and PM2.5.

It reports that emissions of sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and fluoride have remained stable over the past five years. However, particulate matter emissions have slightly increased in the last three years.

To address these concerns, Rio Tinto invests in emission-control technologies and monitoring systems to meet regulations and stakeholder expectations.

The final aim is to go net-zero operational emissions by 2050. And the company consciously recognizes that this goal needs major tech breakthroughs. Almost half of its emissions come from sources that are hard to eliminate with current technology.

Thus, projects like AP60 and ELYSIS show Rio Tinto’s plans to tackle these challenges. They combine innovation, renewable energy, and operational improvements. This way, the company aims to provide materials for the energy transition while lowering its environmental impact.

Elon Muskโ€™s 100 GW Solar Moonshot: Can Tesla (TSLA) and SpaceX Pull It Off?

Elon Musk wants SpaceX and Tesla (TSLA stock) teams to build 100 gigawatts of solar power manufacturing capacity in the US. He wants to do that within three years. Industry reports say this plan could reshape America’s solar market if the companies can pull it off.

The plan is huge. Module manufacturing grew more than 50% in 2025, with 65.5 GW of capacity online, up from 42.5 GW at the end of 2024. Musk wants to build more than the entire current US market can make. That’s bold even for him.

The Scale Challenge: Can Tesla and SpaceX Really Build 100 GW of Solar Capacity?

The numbers show just how big this goal is. As of last year, U.S. factories were officially able to produce enough solar modules to meet domestic demand. Cell capacity, however, lags far behind, at just 3.2 gigawatts. Tesla and SpaceX each want to build 100 GW of yearly output.

  • Total solar module manufacturing in the US was approximately just above 45 GW at the end of 2025, and is expected to rise to 60 GW in 2026.

us solar pv installations

  • The two companies want to build over three times that much. Combined, they’d aim for 200 GW of total yearly capacity.

This would make them the world’s biggest solar makers. China leads global output today. But Musk thinks America can build massive solar capacity quickly. Tesla has built manufacturing facilities in China and the US โ€” much faster than skeptics assumed the company could.

The plan goes beyond just making panels. “We’re going to work toward getting 100 GW a year of solar cell production, integrating across the entire supply chain from raw materials all the way to finished solar panels.” That means mining, refining, cells, and modules all in America.

A $2.9 Billion Bet on American Solar Manufacturing

Tesla has already started spending. Tesla is looking to buy equipment worth $2.9 billion for manufacturing solar panels and cells from Chinese suppliers, including Suzhou Maxwell Technologies. The deal shows Musk is serious about the 100 GW goal.

The equipment purchase from China includes key tools for making solar cells. As per reports, Suzhou Maxwell Technologies, the world’s biggest producer of screen-printing equipment used to make solar cells, is among the leading candidates to supply machinery for the project. Other potential suppliers include Shenzhen S.C New Energy Technology and Laplace Renewable Energy Technology.

The timing matters too. The Chinese companies were told to deliver the equipment before this autumn, with two saying it would be shipped to Texas. Tesla wants to move fast on this plan.

The reported $2.9 billion solar spend would likely increase Tesla’s previously guided $20 billion in 2026 capex, Barclays analyst Dan Levy said following the news. That’s a lot of money for one company to invest in solar.

Why Texas Is Ground Zero for Muskโ€™s Solar Ambitions

Texas will be the center of Tesla’s solar push. The Brookshire facility is where Tesla plans to anchor that 100 GW ambition. Electrek has confirmed that Tesla is planning full vertically integrated solar manufacturing at the Brookshire site, not simple panel assembly.

The state gives Tesla some help with power grid rules too. Legislators in Texas, where Tesla operates its largest US gigafactory and has announced plans to expand, passed Senate Bill 6 in June 2025, directing the Public Utility Commission of Texas to develop a new framework for large load interconnections greater than 75 MW.

SpaceX will likely build its own separate 100 GW capacity. Musk plans to build the solar capacity mainly for use by Tesla, although some will be used to power SpaceX satellites. That suggests both companies will use much of their own output.

The space-based solar plans connect to SpaceX’s broader goals. Both companies see huge energy demand coming from AI and data centers. Solar could power those needs.

us power demand solar
Source: US National Power Demand Study 2025 Report

Dream Big, Build Bigger: What Could Stand in the Way?

Industry experts have mixed views on whether this can work. To anyone who knows about US solar manufacturing, Elon Musk’s claim that SpaceX and Tesla are working to build 100 GW of annual PV manufacturing capacity might seem unachievable.

Additionally, the supply chain needs work too. The domestic solar supply chain shows severe imbalances. Some stats include:

  • Polysilicon production from Hemlock Semiconductor and Wacker Chemie holds steady at 40,000 metric tons, which supplies only 21 GW of solar production.
  • Ingot and wafer active capacity from Hanwha Qcells and Corning provides just 5.3 GW. Crystalline silicon cell manufacturing stands at only 3 GW.

But the equipment costs look right. According to the 2025 Benchmarks in the Detailed Cost Analysis Model from energy data resource Open EI, the equipment necessary to produce 100 GW of tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) cells per year would require an investment of $3.5 billion if purchased from the lowest-cost Chinese suppliers. Tesla’s $2.9 billion deal fits that range.

Current demand supports big growth, too.

  • The U.S. Solar PV Market was valued at USD 43.67 billion in 2025, is estimated to reach USD 49.69 billion in 2026, and is projected to reach USD 139.77 billion by 2034, growing at a CAGR of 13.8% from 2026 to 2034.

Can Tesla Beat Chinaโ€™s Solar Dominance?

Tesla faces trade rule challenges. Federal rules govern a 10% domestic content bonus tax credit, with projects needing to prove that 50% of total component costs come from U.S.-mined, produced, or manufactured items. The 45X advanced manufacturing tax credit provides a $0.07 per watt subsidy for U.S.-assembled modules.

Chinese oversupply hurts US makers. Severe and chronic oversupply in the global solar industry is largely driven by manufacturing capacity expansion in China, where production output now exceeds global installation demand.

  • At the peak of China’s 2024 solar boom, new factories were announced almost weekly, resulting in module prices dropping by up to 50%.

china pv addition

Other companies are building capacity too. Manufacturing concentration is moderate: the top five module suppliers held roughly 60% shipment share in 2025.

  • First Solar’s 14 GW cadmium-telluride capacity unlocks full domestic-content and prevailing-wage adders.
  • Hanwha Q CELLS’ 8.4 GW Georgia facility brings crystalline-silicon output within 10% of Southeast-Asian cost benchmarks.

New factories keep opening. April 2025:

  • Boviet Solar opened a North Carolina plant worth USD 294 million, launching 2 GW of initial capacity with plans to reach 4 GW.
  • Waaree Energies secured approval to double its solar module manufacturing capacity at its Brookshire facility in Texas, USA, elevating the total capacity to a significant 3.2 GW.

solar pv

The Bottom Line

Musk’s 100 GW solar plan is huge but not impossible. Tesla has the money to try. The US market can support big growth. China’s oversupply creates opportunities for US makers with the right cost structure.

The real test will be execution. Tesla is almost a decade behind schedule on what Musk said the company would achieve with self-driving cars, and SpaceX is years behind schedule on sending people to Mars. But both companies have delivered on big factory projects before.

Success would transform US solar manufacturing. Two companies making 200 GW yearly would make America a solar export power. It would also reduce dependence on Chinese supply chains. That fits with broader US goals for energy independence and carbon reduction.

The plan faces real challenges. Supply chain gaps, trade rules, and Chinese competition all create risks. But if Tesla and SpaceX can build their 100 GW factories, they’ll reshape global solar markets. The next three years will show if Musk’s latest big bet pays off.

Microsoft and Avangrid Team Up on 140MW Solar Project to Power AI Growth and Net Zero Goals

Microsoft has signed a new solar energy agreement with U.S. energy company Avangrid, a member of the Iberdrola Group. The deal adds another large renewable energy project to Microsoft’s growing clean power portfolio.

The agreement covers the Bluebird Solar project in Klickitat County, Washington. The facility will have a capacity of 140 megawatts direct current (MWdc), or 100 megawatts alternating current (MWac). According to Avangrid, the project can generate enough electricity to power more than 20,000 homes.

Avangrid CEO Jose Antonio Miranda said:

โ€œWe are proud to have built a strong relationship with Microsoft to help them meet their energy needs while investing in the communities where we operate. This adds to Avangridโ€™s strong track record of developing projects to help meet growing energy demands from the worldโ€™s leading technology companies.โ€

AIโ€™s Power Appetite Is Reshaping Energy Markets

The deal uses a power purchase agreement (PPA). This type of contract allows companies to buy renewable electricity over a long period. PPAs also help fund new renewable energy projects before they begin operating.

Bluebird Solar is expected to start commercial operations in 2028. Avangrid says the project represents about $300 million in local investment. It could also create around 300 construction jobs during development.

The agreement strengthens an existing partnership between the two companies. It is now the fourth renewable energy contract signed by Microsoft and Avangrid in the United States.

Together, the companies have more than 500 MW of contracted energy capacity. Their existing projects include:

  • Powell Creek Solar in Ohio,
  • Camino Solar in California, and
  • Juniper Canyon Wind in Washington.

The latest agreement comes as the tech giant faces growing electricity demand. Artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and data centers require large amounts of power. As Microsoft expands these businesses, its energy needs continue to rise.

According to Microsoft’s latest sustainability report, the company’s energy use has increased by 168% since 2020. During the same period, its greenhouse gas emissions rose by 23.4%.

Microsoft carbon emissions
Source: Microsoft

The company says its business growth has been much faster than its emissions growth. Company revenue increased by 71% over the same period.

MORE ON MICROSOFT:ย 

The challenge is not limited to Microsoft. Many technology companies are building new data centers to support AI services. These facilities need large and reliable sources of electricity.

As a result, companies are signing more renewable energy contracts. Solar, wind, battery storage, and nuclear energy are becoming important parts of long-term power strategies.

The Bluebird Solar agreement reflects this trend. Instead of relying only on existing electricity markets, large companies are helping finance new energy projects directly.

Inside Microsoftโ€™s Expanding Climate and Net Zero Playbook

Microsoft remains one of the world’s largest corporate buyers of renewable energy. The company has committed to becoming carbon negative by 2030. This means it plans to remove more carbon from the atmosphere than it emits each year.

Microsoft Clean Energy Capacity (2020 vs. 2025)

The tech company has promised to remove from the atmosphere all carbon the company has emitted since its founding in 1975. To support these goals, Microsoft has expanded its clean energy program worldwide.

The 2025 Environmental Sustainability Report states that the company has secured 34 gigawatts (GW) of renewable energy. This capacity spans 24 countries.

Microsoft also says it now matches 100% of its annual electricity consumption with renewable energy generation. The company achieved this through more than 400 renewable energy agreements across 26 countries.

Microsoft clean energy potfolio
Source: Microsoft

Another goal is Microsoft’s “100/100/0” commitment. Under this plan, the company aims to match 100% of its electricity use with carbon-free energy sources, 100% of the time, by 2030.

Microsoft is also investing heavily in carbon removal projects. In 2025, it contracted nearly 45 million metric tons of carbon removals. However, the tech company was recently reported to have halted its carbon removal purchases in consideration of its climate strategy.ย 

microsoft carbon removals
Source: Microsoft

The company is also improving the efficiency of its data centers. The tech giant says new cooling technologies can save more than 125 million liters of water per facility each year. It also reports that hybrid timber-steel construction can cut embodied carbon by up to 65% compared with traditional concrete designs.

Avangrid Positions Itself for Growing Corporate Energy Demand

For Avangrid, the agreement highlights growing demand from large corporate customers. The company is part of the Iberdrola Group, one of the world’s biggest renewable energy developers. It operates electricity networks and renewable energy projects across the United States.

Demand from technology companies has become an important growth driver for renewable energy developers. Data center operators are signing long-term contracts to secure clean electricity while meeting climate goals. The Bluebird Solar project is an example of this shift.

Beyond supplying electricity, projects like Bluebird often bring economic benefits to local communities. These include construction jobs, tax revenue, infrastructure spending, and long-term income for landowners.

Hence, renewable developers will have a bigger role as electricity demand grows. They will help with grid expansion and cut down emissions.

Solar and Wind Continue to Dominate Americaโ€™s Power Buildout

Microsoft’s latest agreement reflects broader changes across the U.S. energy sector. Renewable energy now accounts for most new electricity generation capacity being added nationwide.

According to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission data, renewable energy sources comprised nearly 90% of new U.S. electrical generating capacity added in 2025. Solar led the growth. It accounted for 36.3% of total available installed utility-scale capacity.

Corporate buyers remain a major driver of this growth. More and more technology companies, manufacturers, retailers, and financial firms are using power purchase agreements. These agreements help them secure clean electricity and manage future energy costs.

Solar energy is becoming one of the most important technologies in the global transition to net zero. It is now one of the lowest-cost sources of new electricity in many markets. As costs continue to fall, more industries are using solar power to reduce emissions from their operations.

solar energy fact sheet US data SEIA
Source: SEIA

This trend is helping drive decarbonization across sectors such as manufacturing, transportation, mining, and data centers. Companies are under increasing pressure from investors, customers, and regulators to cut emissions. Access to renewable electricity is becoming a key part of those efforts.

Industry forecasts suggest electricity demand will continue rising throughout the decade. Growth in AI, electric vehicles, and industrial electrification will require large amounts of new power generation. This creates a growing need for clean energy projects that can support economic growth without increasing carbon emissions.

Clean Energy Partnerships Are Becoming Strategic Investments

The Microsoft-Avangrid agreement highlights how renewable energy procurement is changing. Corporate clean energy contracts were once seen mainly as sustainability initiatives. Today, they are becoming part of long-term infrastructure planning.

For technology companies, access to reliable electricity is now closely linked to future growth. Renewable energy agreements help secure power supplies while supporting climate commitments.

For energy developers, these contracts provide stable revenue that helps finance new projects.

The Bluebird Solar project represents only 140 MW of new capacity. However, it reflects a much larger shift taking place across the energy sector.

Companies are no longer just buying electricity. More of them are helping build the energy infrastructure needed to support future economic growth while advancing the transition to lower-carbon energy systems.

From Timber Crisis to Climate Opportunity: Why Carbon Credits Are Becoming Critical for Japanโ€™s Forest Future

Japanโ€™s forestry sector is facing a deep crisis. Falling timber prices, an aging workforce, and shrinking rural populations are leaving large parts of the countryโ€™s forests abandoned or poorly managed. Now, carbon credits are emerging as a possible lifeline that could help restore forests, support local economies, and strengthen Japanโ€™s climate goals.

According to reporting by The Japan Times, forestry groups in Miyagi Prefecture are trying to use carbon finance to transform struggling plantation forests into healthier and more climate-resilient ecosystems.

The effort highlights a larger shift happening across Japan as foresters, companies, and policymakers search for ways to make forest management profitable again while cutting carbon emissions.

Japanโ€™s Forestry Industry Faces Long-Term Decline

Japan has vast forest resources, but many forests are no longer economically viable. Cheap imported timber has reduced domestic wood prices for years. At the same time, forest ownership is highly fragmented, making large-scale management difficult.

The workforce is also shrinking quickly. Many forestry workers are elderly, and younger generations are leaving rural communities for cities. As profits disappear, more landowners are giving up their forests entirely.

Akio Abe, associate director of the Ishinomaki District Forestry Association in Miyagi Prefecture, told The Japan Times that forest values have fallen so sharply that many owners no longer see a reason to keep managing their land.

Poor Forest Management Raises Climate Risks

Around 40% of Japanโ€™s forests are planted forests, mostly dense cedar and cypress plantations established decades ago when timber demand was much stronger. These monoculture forests require regular thinning and maintenance. Without proper care, biodiversity declines and ecosystems weaken.

Many forests are now overcrowded because owners cannot afford thinning operations. That creates multiple environmental risks. Dense forests block sunlight from reaching the ground, preventing undergrowth and broadleaf species from developing naturally.

Koumei Maruyama, CEO and co-founder of Japanese startup iForest, explained that poorly managed plantation forests also develop weak root systems, increasing the risk of landslides.

How a Tsunami Helped Spark a Forest Carbon Project

The Ishinomaki forest carbon project began after the devastating 2011 tsunami that struck northeastern Japan. The disaster heavily damaged the city of Ishinomaki and nearby Onagawa, where forestry remains an important industry.

Years later, local populations still have not fully recovered.

In 2022, Hitachi Systems sent employees to Onagawa to explore regional revitalization ideas. The company partnered with French climate startup Everimpact, which specializes in carbon measurement and climate finance.

The project team selected 900 hectares of forest dominated by planted conifers. About 72% of the area consisted of cedar and cypress plantations.

JAPAN Forests

Everimpact used two decades of satellite data to study changes in forest biomass and carbon storage. The analysis showed that many aging conifer plantations were declining.

As the trees aged, photosynthesis slowed while decomposition and respiration increased. Some forest areas were gradually becoming net carbon emitters during parts of the year instead of carbon sinks.

The findings confirmed what local foresters already feared. Without thinning and restoration work, the forests would continue losing ecological and climate value.

The Race to Build Climate-Resilient Forests in Japan

Project members decided to completely rethink forest management. Their strategy involves thinning older conifers and planting younger trees, including more broadleaf species. The goal is to create mixed forests that are healthier, more biodiverse, and better adapted to climate change.

Akihito Kitade of Hitachi Systems said plantation forests now cover far more land than Japanโ€™s timber demand requires. He believes many forests should gradually return to conditions closer to natural ecosystems.

Mixed forests also require less long-term maintenance. Broadleaf species can better tolerate hotter and drier climates, which climate models suggest northeastern Japan may increasingly experience in the future.

The issue is becoming more urgent as climate change raises wildfire risks across Japan. Neighboring Iwate Prefecture has already experienced destructive wildfires in recent years.

The Ishinomaki project hopes:

  • Carbon finance can support this transition while generating new revenue for local forest owners.
  • And it can potentially generate carbon credits worth up to ยฅ260 million.

Kitade said the goal is not simply to create profits, but to reinvest money into improving environmental value and sustaining forests for future generations.

Japan carbon credit

How High-Integrity Carbon Credits Could Support Forest Restoration?

Forest carbon projects generate credits by demonstrating that improved forest management (IFM) can store more carbon or reduce emissions compared to standard forestry practices. A major requirement is โ€œadditionality,โ€ meaning projects must demonstrate that the work would not occur without carbon finance support.

IFM has become an important part of voluntary carbon markets:

  • Globally, around 293 IFM projects have produced roughly 11% of all carbon offset credits issued by registries.
  • IFM could help increase global carbon storage by 0.2 to 2.1 gigatonnes of COโ‚‚e each year without reducing timber supply.

Practices such as longer harvest cycles, careful logging, and soil protection help forests absorb more carbon while keeping ecosystems healthier. Better forest management can also make forests more resilient to wildfires, pests, and extreme weather, which are becoming more common as climate change worsens.

  • The Ishinomaki project chose the Verified Carbon Standardโ€™s Improved Forest Management methodology under Verra, one of the worldโ€™s largest voluntary carbon standards organizations.
  • The methodology compares forest carbon performance against national forest data baselines.

Notably, the project team selected Verraโ€™s program because it supports satellite-based carbon monitoring and has strong international market recognition.

Furthermore, high-quality carbon credits can also command higher prices, especially when projects provide biodiversity benefits alongside carbon reductions.

  • According to iForestโ€™s Maruyama, global data suggests carbon credits with biodiversity co-benefits can sell for 38% to 60% more than credits focused only on carbon.

However, forest carbon markets have also faced criticism. Multiple investigations in recent years questioned whether some forest carbon projects truly delivered the climate benefits they promised.

Experts continue to stress that carbon credits should support โ€” not replace โ€” direct fossil fuel emissions reductions. Still, many climate specialists believe forest carbon finance remains an important tool for protecting ecosystems and mobilizing investment.

Japanโ€™s Government Wants Forests to Absorb More Carbon

Japanโ€™s government sees forests as a major part of its long-term climate strategy.

  • Government data shows Japanโ€™s forests removed roughly 45 million tons of CO2 in 2023. Officials want that number to rise to 72 million tons annually by 2040 โ€” an increase of about 60%.
  • Japan is also targeting a 46% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 compared with 2013 levels while pursuing net-zero emissions by 2050.

To help achieve these goals, the government operates the J-Credit system, launched in 2013. The program certifies emissions reductions from projects such as energy efficiency upgrades and forest management.

As of March, 356 forestry-related projects had been registered under the system.

According to reporting from S&P Global Commodity Insights,

  • Forestry J-Credits in Japanโ€™s over-the-counter market were trading around ยฅ10,000 to ยฅ14,000 per ton of CO2 equivalent.
  • That was significantly higher than solar renewable energy J-Credits, which traded near ยฅ4,000 per ton.

Market participants told S&P Global that forestry credits often command premiums because buyers value their environmental co-benefits, including biodiversity and local ecosystem restoration.

Carbon brokers also noted that many forestry projects are connected to local governments, which are often reluctant to sell credits quickly because forests are treated as important public assets.

Supply Constraints Could Push Carbon Prices Higher

Japanโ€™s carbon market may face growing supply shortages in the coming years.

According to a 2025 market survey conducted by Exroad and the Tokyo Stock Exchange Carbon Credit Market Development Office, annual demand under Japanโ€™s GX-ETS Phase 2 emissions trading system could conservatively reach 3 million tons per year.

  • Current J-Credit supply, however, is estimated at only around 1 million tons annually.
  • The report warned that this imbalance could push prices significantly higher. Forecasts suggest allowance prices may rise from roughly ยฅ4,000โ€“6,000 per ton in 2027 to more than ยฅ6,000 per ton by 2030.

Without a major increase in domestic credit generation, carbon-intensive industries could face rising financial pressure as climate regulations tighten.

At the same time, stricter standards are making carbon credits more credible and scientifically rigorous.

japan carbon credits carbon market

For projects like Ishinomaki, this creates an opportunity to combine forest restoration, biodiversity protection, and climate action into one long-term economic model. The Ishinomaki team hopes its project can become a model for other regions across Japan.

Everimpact co-founder Alain Retierez said modern forestry must focus on building climate-resilient forests managed in a more selective and nature-focused way.

To sum up, the project aims to prove that carbon finance can help revive Japanโ€™s struggling forestry sector while supporting the countryโ€™s path toward net zero.

Data Center Giants Enter Carbon Credit Market as Hyperscalers Fuel a New Green Tech Gold Rush

A data center firm backed by Oaktree Capital Management is planning to sell carbon credits directly to hyperscale cloud companies. These are large tech firms that run massive cloud and AI infrastructure.

The plan, reported by Bloomberg, reflects a new shift in how data centers approach climate action. Some firms are not just cutting emissions in their operations but are also exploring carbon markets. This helps them create extra revenue while reaching their sustainability goals.

Hyperscalers like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google have all set strong climate targets. Microsoft aims to become carbon negative by 2030, while Amazon targets net-zero carbon by 2040. Google aims for net zero emissions across its operations and value chain by 2030.

This growing demand for carbon reduction tools is creating new business opportunities across the digital infrastructure sector.

Why Data Centers Are Under Climate Pressure

Data centers are now one of the fastest-growing sources of electricity demand. The International Energy Agency (IEA) reports that data centers, AI, and cryptocurrency used about 1.5-2% of global electricity in recent years. This demand is rising fast because of AI growth.

This matters because electricity use is closely tied to carbon emissions, depending on the energy source. As more digital services move to the cloud, emissions from power-hungry servers also increase.

data center electricity use and type EIA

Hyperscalers are now under pressure from regulators, investors, and customers to reduce their carbon footprint. Many companies have already improved energy efficiency and shifted to renewable energy procurement.

However, in many regions, a clean power supply is still not enough to fully match demand. This gap is where carbon credits are becoming more important.

How Carbon Credit Selling Would Work in Pure DC’s Removal Platform

Carbon credits represent verified reductions or removals of greenhouse gases. One credit usually equals one metric ton of carbon dioxide reduced or removed from the atmosphere. These credits could help tech companies meet their voluntary or regulatory climate goals.

In this case, the Oaktree-backed data center firm, Pure Data Centres (Pure DC), is launching a carbon removal credit platform for hyperscale cloud companies. The initiative will operate through its climate-tech unit, A Healthier Earth.

The move comes as AI and cloud computing sharply increase electricity demand and emissions from data centers. Many facilities still rely partly on fossil fuels for power.

Pure DCโ€™s chief research and development officer, Alastair Collier, stated:

โ€œThis is about turning carbon removal into infrastructure, aligning organisations with the ambition to lead on climate with a platform designed and committed to deliver at scale.โ€

Pure DC is also expanding its infrastructure business. The company reportedly sought funding last year at a valuation of up to ยฃ5 billion ($6.7 billion). It plans to build AI-focused data center campuses across Europe and the UK with a combined target capacity of 3 gigawatts.

Its carbon credit strategy focuses on biochar. A Healthier Earth is developing a biochar project in Wiltshire, England. The process converts agricultural waste and biomass into a charcoal-like material that can store carbon for hundreds of years.

biochar carbon credit market 2025

Gary Wojtaszek, Executive Chairman & interim CEO, Pure DC, remarked:

“What weโ€™re doing at Pure DC is the first of its kind anywhere in the world. In Dublin weโ€™ve demonstrated that net zero carbon, self-powered data centres are deliverable. Now, with our Biochar Integrated Carbon Removal from AHE, weโ€™re making them scalable. This isnโ€™t incremental improvement; itโ€™s a complete reset of how this sector will be built going forward.”

Each credit will represent one metric ton of carbon dioxide removed from the atmosphere. Pure DC expects annual carbon credit supply to reach about 100,000 credits by 2029. That is equal to the yearly emissions of around 23,000 passenger cars.

The company plans to issue its first verified credits before the end of the year. Pure DC also said it will not use the credits for its own emissions. Instead, they will be sold to hyperscalers and other companies seeking to offset residual emissions.

Pure DC believes combining AI infrastructure with verified carbon removal services will help attract major cloud customers. The company is also building a self-sufficient data center in Ireland as part of its broader sustainability strategy.

This approach is part of a broader trend where infrastructure companies are blending physical decarbonization with market-based solutions. Companies are now looking beyond just renewable energy and efficiency upgrades. They are also using carbon markets to fill any emissions gaps.

However, carbon credit markets have faced criticism. Concerns include:

  • Inconsistent quality,
  • Risks of double counting, and
  • Questions about real emissions reductions from some projects.

These issues have led to tighter standards and more scrutiny from buyers. Despite this, demand from large technology firms remains strong due to their aggressive net zero timelines.

Microsoft, Amazon, and Google Drive Demand for Carbon Solutions

The biggest driver of carbon credit demand is the rapid expansion of hyperscale computing. Cloud services, artificial intelligence, and data storage are all expanding at high speed.

Companies like Microsoft and Google have committed to 24/7 carbon-free energy goals in the coming years. This means matching electricity use with clean energy sources every hour of the day, not just annually.

Amazon has also expanded renewable energy investments across global operations. It has become one of the largest corporate buyers of renewable energy worldwide.

These companies still face a challenge. Clean energy availability is uneven across regions. Data center growth is also faster than renewable infrastructure expansion in many markets.

As a result, carbon credits are being used as a transitional tool. They help companies bridge the gap while long-term clean energy systems are built. This dynamic explains why infrastructure players are now entering carbon credit markets more directly.

Can Carbon Credits Keep Big Techโ€™s Net-Zero Promises Alive?

For hyperscalers, carbon credits offer flexibility but not a full solution. Most companies still prioritize direct emissions reductions as the main path toward net zero.

Across the broader market, corporate use of carbon credits has grown steadily. According to data from major market registries tracked by the Ecosystem Marketplace, companies retired hundreds of millions of carbon credits annually in recent years.

Per AlliedOffsets data, voluntary market retirements are estimated at around 190 million credits in 2023 and decreased to 188 million in 2025.

Carbon credit retirements for voluntary and compliance
Source: AlliedOffsets

Carbon credits are generally seen as a supporting tool rather than a substitute for real emissions cuts. Many companies now prefer high-quality credits tied to verified carbon removal projects such as reforestation or direct air capture.

For data center operators, the move into carbon credit sales adds a new revenue layer. It also increases pressure to ensure transparency and credibility in emissions accounting.

A New Link Between Cloud Growth and Carbon Markets

The decision by an Oaktree-backed data center firm to sell carbon credits to hyperscalers reflects a broader shift in the tech and energy landscape. Data centers are no longer just infrastructure providers. They are becoming active participants in carbon markets and climate finance.

As demand for AI, cloud computing, and digital services continues to rise, energy use will also increase. This creates ongoing pressure for companies to balance growth with climate responsibility.

Carbon credits offer a solution to fill the gap. While not a complete solution, they are becoming more integrated into how large tech ecosystems manage emissions. The result is a new connection between digital infrastructure and global climate marketsโ€”one that is likely to grow as both sectors expand.