Trump EPA’s Largest Climate Deregulation: What the 2009 “Endangerment Finding” Repeal Means for U.S. Emissions and the EV Market

On February 12, President Donald Trump and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin announced what they called the largest deregulation in U.S. history in the White House’s Roosevelt Room.

The EPA finalized a rule that removes the 2009 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Endangerment Finding. The Obama administration created this finding, and it gave the federal government the legal authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act for more than a decade.

The new rule also removes all federal greenhouse gas standards for cars, trucks, and engines built from model year 2012 through 2027 and beyond. In addition, the EPA ended compliance credits tied to certain technologies, including start-stop systems.

In short, the administration rolled back the key rule that supported federal climate regulations on vehicles.

The Role of the 2009 Endangerment Finding

In 2009, the EPA said that six major greenhouse gases—including carbon dioxide—harm public health and the environment. The agency concluded that these gases drive climate change and damage air quality. That decision gave the federal government the authority to set emission limits for light-, medium-, and heavy-duty vehicles. It also supported climate rules for power plants and the oil and gas industry.

Because of this finding, the EPA introduced several greenhouse gas standards over the past decade. These rules shaped vehicle design, fuel economy targets, and broader climate policy across multiple sectors.

Why the EPA Repealed It Now

In 2025, the Trump administration began reviewing the 2009 decision. Officials argued that some of the science behind the finding was weaker than originally believed. They also said earlier climate projections were too pessimistic.

Now that the repeal is final, the EPA says it no longer has authority under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases the way it did before. The agency believes Congress—not federal regulators—should decide major climate policy.

EPA leaders say this move restores a strict reading of the law and ends what they call regulatory overreach. Critics strongly disagree. Many scientists and public health experts argue that the repeal removes an important tool that protects Americans and helps address climate change.

Most importantly, the EPA estimates the final rule will save more than $1.3 trillion. It removes requirements for automakers to measure, report, certify, and comply with federal greenhouse gas standards. The agency says the rollback will lower vehicle prices, expand consumer choice, and reduce transportation costs for families and businesses.

Administrator Zeldin commented,

“The Endangerment Finding has been the source of 16 years of consumer choice restrictions and trillions of dollars in hidden costs for Americans. Referred to by some as the ‘Holy Grail’ of the ‘climate change religion,’ the Endangerment Finding is now eliminated. The Trump EPA is strictly following the letter of the law, returning commonsense to policy, delivering consumer choice to Americans and advancing the American Dream. As EPA Administrator, I am proud to deliver the single largest deregulatory action in U.S. history on behalf of American taxpayers and consumers. As an added bonus, the off-cycle credit for the almost universally despised start-stop feature on vehicles has been removed.”

U.S. Emissions Trends in 2025: Mixed Signals

At a climate crossroads, the United States saw a rebound in greenhouse gas emissions in 2025 after years of overall decline. According to estimates from the Rhodium Group, total U.S. emissions rose about 2.4% in 2025, reaching roughly 5.9 billion tons of CO₂ equivalent—139 million tons higher than in 2024. This uptick ended a two‑year downward trend that had been driven by cleaner energy and transportation shifts.

us emission

Several factors pushed emissions higher: colder winter weather increased demand for heating; rising electricity demand from data centers and cryptocurrency mining boosted fossil fuel use; and higher natural gas prices led utilities to burn more coal. The power sector alone saw a 3.8% rise in emissions, while buildings’ emissions jumped 6.8%. Transportation emissions, the largest U.S. source, remained largely flat, increasing only modestly due to continued adoption of hybrid and electric vehicles.

us emissions

Despite the 2025 increase, total emissions are still below pre‑pandemic levels and well under 2005 baselines—roughly 18% below 2005 levels—showing that long‑term trends toward decarbonization have not entirely reversed yet.

Preliminary sector data from Climate TRACE also indicates that U.S. emissions continued rising throughout 2025, adding more than 71 million tonnes of CO₂ equivalent through the first three quarters of the year.

The EV Market in 2025: Growth and Slowdowns

In contrast to emissions trends, the U.S. electric vehicle (EV) market continued to grow in 2025, though the pace and dynamics evolved. EVs made notable gains in sales and market share, reflecting both consumer demand and industry transitions.

In the first quarter of 2025, nearly 300,000 battery‑electric vehicles were newly registered, marking over a 10% year‑over‑year increase. EVs accounted for about 7.5% of all new car registrations during that period.

By the third quarter, sales surged again. Cox Automotive reported that EV sales jumped nearly 30% year‑over‑year, pushing EV market share to a record 10.5% of total vehicle sales in Q3 2025—a milestone reflecting strong consumer uptake in several segments.

ev sales
source: Cox Automotive

Even so, EV adoption remains far from dominating the U.S. market. Estimates show that electric vehicles comprised around 8–10% of total U.S. new car sales in 2025, with internal‑combustion engine vehicles still accounting for the large majority of the fleet.

Tesla remained the largest EV brand in the U.S. in 2025, holding about 46% market share, though this marked a slight decline from previous years. Rivals like Chevrolet and Hyundai grew their shares, reflecting broader model availability and shifting consumer preferences.

Market analysts also project that by 2025, the U.S. EV market’s size, sales, and technology focus will continue expanding—with battery‑electric vehicles expected to dominate EV segments. The broader EV market size had substantial growth in 2025, with further expansion expected toward the end of the decade.

us ev market

Balancing Regulation, Consumer Choice, and Emissions Goals

EPA officials say that removing federal GHG standards and related compliance credits will lower vehicle costs by about $2,400 per car. This will ease financial pressure on families and businesses and give buyers more choice. The agency calls it a step toward restoring the American Dream, making transportation more affordable without high regulatory costs.

Supporters argue the rollback removes artificial mandates, letting automakers and consumers focus on market-driven solutions. The EPA also ended “off-cycle” credits, which allowed carmakers to meet emission targets with minor technology changes. Critics called these credits gimmicks with little real environmental benefit.

Litigation and Future Policy

Environmental groups, scientists, and several states sharply criticized the move. They warn that it weakens climate action, public health protections, and emission reductions. Many fear that removing these rules while emissions are rising could set back U.S. climate goals.

Legal challenges are expected, with lawsuits likely to block or reverse the repeal. As federal rules change, state policies, corporate commitments, and Congress may play a larger role. Some states have already set carbon standards and EV incentives, creating a patchwork of climate policies across the country.

In conclusion, the 2026 repeal of the GHG Endangerment Finding marks a major shift in U.S. climate policy. With emissions rising and clean technology markets evolving, the country faces tough choices about balancing economic growth, innovation, and climate risk. The coming years will be shaped by lawsuits, state leadership, private investments, and the global move toward low-carbon economies.

DECARBON 2026 Concludes with Two Days of Strategic Debate and Practical Decarbonisation Insights

0

Hosted by Shell and held in partnership with Moeve, Fluor, Gasunie, The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, Repsol, Spiecapag and Germany Trade and Invest, DECARBON 2026 centred on practical decision-making at the intersection of policy, technology and implementation across the oil and gas value chain in Vösendorf, Austria.

On 9 February, the first day opened with an Executive Opening Panel that set the strategic context for DECARBON by linking emissions targets with the operational capabilities required to deliver them. Drawing on perspectives from Petro IT, Shell Austria, Saipem SpA, Austrian Gas Grid Management AG, Chromalox, NEUMAN & ESSER Deutschland GmbH & Co KG and PCK Raffinerie GmbH, the discussion addressed investment priorities, data-driven decision-making and on-site constraints, clarifying why a strategic approach and clearly defined NetZero targets play a central role in modern oil and gas operations.

As Rainer Klöpfer, Country Chair & Managing Director at Shell Austria, emphasised, the conversation around net-zero must account for the full carbon intensity of energy products, spanning production, supply chains and end use. He underlined that operating plans are updated regularly and reflect today’s economic realities, while long-term net-zero targets sit beyond immediate planning cycles and require steady structural progress. This perspective shifted the focus from ambition to execution and naturally opened the floor to the next strategic question: which concrete low-carbon solutions can integrate into existing systems at scale.

This was followed by the Leaders Panel on low-carbon hydrogen as a decarbonisation tool, with contributions from a broad range of energy, infrastructure and technology players, including MOL Group, Eurogas, NextChem, Alléo Energy, Moeve and Italgas Reti. The panel examined hydrogen’s role within decarbonisation strategies and its interaction with existing infrastructure and regulatory frameworks.

Pedro Medina, Hydrogen Technology Manager at Moeve, outlined the company’s transformation of its refineries in San Roque and Palos de la Frontera into diversified energy parks adapted for renewable fuels, including biofuels and green hydrogen. He emphasised Southern Europe’s strong production potential and referred to the development of European hydrogen corridors connecting hubs such as Huelva and Algeciras with

Rotterdam, illustrating how green hydrogen is taking shape as a cross-border value chain within the evolving European energy landscape.

The conversation then continued through two roundtable discussions. The first roundtable on the digital approach to emissions performance brought together representatives from Siemens AG, Gradyent and other industry participants to explore digitalisation, automation and data-driven sustainability initiatives. The next roundtable on institutional readiness, with participants from Wood, OPEC, OGE and others, addressed regulatory risk, compliance requirements and policy developments.

Day One also featured two thematic sessions examining decarbonisation pathways in downstream operations through low-carbon fuels and feedstock, alongside practical levers for emissions reduction in upstream activities, with contributions from companies including TotalEnergies, Chromalox, VEM Sachsenwerk GmbH and others.

It concluded with a gala dinner and prize draw at Casino Baumgarten, located in the heart of Vienna. Live music, a magician’s performance and a gift raffle from BGS Group and participating delegates created a vibrant atmosphere, while conversations continued over dinner in an informal setting that strengthened professional connections.

The second day moved the discussion toward evaluation and optimisation, bringing sharper focus to cost, performance and implementation. During a moderated debate, representatives of Reganosa, Saras, Gas Infrastructure Europe and The Carbon Capture and Storage Association examined the financial implications of decarbonisation and the investment logic behind transition pathways. Roundtable 3 then turned to energy efficiency in downstream, where Fluor, Akselos and other sector specialists shared operational case studies and technical insight. The Congress concluded with a Closing Panel on CCUS, featuring perspectives from Petrofac, DESFA, Worley Comprimo and others, highlighting carbon capture, utilisation and storage within long-term emissions reduction strategies.

Phillip Cooper, Project Director at Petrofac for the Design of the Aramis CCS Pipeline System, summarised the key lesson from project delivery: effective CCS development requires a collaborative and knowledgeable client and FEED team in the room from the outset to ensure alignment and accelerate resolution. He stressed that system engineering across the entire value chain is critical, as the whole system must function as one despite contractual boundaries, and that early involvement of contractors and vendors is essential to understand what the project will realistically cost and to avoid unnecessary cost premiums.

Over the two days, DECARBON 2026 reinforced its role as a closed-door platform for senior executives, technical leaders and policy experts to engage in implementation-oriented dialogue grounded in real operational contexts. More than 180 pre-arranged B2B sessions took place within a structured networking format, coordinated by dedicated personal managers assigned to each delegate. Participants highlighted the productivity and efficiency of these targeted exchanges, with many confirming follow-up discussions and outlining future joint projects.

Registration for DECARBON 2027, taking place on 15-16 February 2027 in Berlin, Germany, is now open. Follow the Congress updates and secure participation in the next edition focused on real-world decarbonisation strategies: https://sh.bgs.group/3ui

Albemarle Shuts Lithium Plant But Bets Big on Strong Demand Outlook for 2026

Albemarle Corporation, one of the world’s largest lithium producers, has closed its Kemerton lithium hydroxide processing plant in Western Australia. The company made the decision due to rising costs and competitive pressures in hard-rock lithium processing. The closure affects more than 250 jobs and dozens of contractors.

The Kemerton plant processed lithium from the Greenbushes mine and was intended to supply battery-grade lithium chemicals. Albemarle invested over US$4 billion in the site, but the facility never reached its target performance. The company cited structural challenges and higher operating costs compared with plants in China.

The shutdown highlights difficulties in building competitive lithium processing outside China. China currently dominates lithium refining and battery supply chains. Many Western firms have struggled to build profitable chemical conversion capacity, even with recent lithium price improvements.

Solid Earnings, Shaky Investor Sentiment

Albemarle reported its fourth-quarter and full-year 2025 earnings in mid-February 2026. The company posted net sales of US$1.4 billion, up about 16% year-on-year, driven by growth in energy storage volumes and pricing. Adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) rose about 7% compared with 2024.

Albemarle financial results 2025
Source: Albemarle

Despite these positive metrics, Albemarle’s stock fell sharply after the earnings release. Morningstar reported that on February 12, 2026, shares fell about 7%. This drop happened during a wider market sell-off. Still, the company’s profit outlook was better than what analysts expected.

Albemarle stock price

Investors reacted to a mixed message from the earnings data. The company had sales growth and strong cash flow. However, the closure of the Kemerton plant and ongoing cost pressures affected sentiment. Some investors were cautious about near-term guidance amid global market volatility.

But Management Bets on a 2026 Demand Rebound

Despite short-term pressures, Albemarle’s management outlined a strong demand outlook for lithium in 2026. In a recent earnings call, company leaders projected that global lithium demand could grow by 15% to 40% in 2026.

Albemarle lithium demand outlook
Source: Albemarle

This growth is driven in part by a sharp rise in stationary energy storage demand and continued EV adoption. Stationary storage includes large battery systems used for grid balancing, renewable energy smoothing, and data centers. These systems are becoming major new consumers of lithium-ion batteries.

Industry reports say global energy storage installations more than doubled in 2025. This rise shows growing demand, extending beyond just electric vehicles.

global energy storage market 2025
Source: Wood Mackenzie

Albemarle also reported that its free cash flow in 2025 was about US$692 million after cost controls and capital discipline. The company plans to keep capital expenditures steady in 2026. It will focus on boosting productivity and developing resources instead of expensive expansion projects.

EVs and Grid Storage Keep the Battery Boom Alive

Lithium is a key metal for lithium-ion batteries. These batteries power electric vehicles (EVs), grid storage systems, portable electronics, and more.

Electric vehicle adoption continues to grow globally. The International Energy Agency says EV sales hit around 20 million units in 2025. This makes up nearly 25% of all car sales globally. EVs alone account for about 75% of total lithium demand in 2025 in battery markets.

In addition, stationary energy storage systems are becoming more common. Battery storage helps balance renewable energy like wind and solar on the grid. Storage growth is part of broader climate and energy policies in many countries.

  • Demand growth is also supported by new battery applications, such as data centers and backup power systems.

Some market analysts expect global lithium demand to more than double by the decade’s end. This will depend on EV adoption rates, renewable energy growth, and storage needs.

Processing Bottlenecks and Price Swings Complicate Supply

While demand is rising, the supply side of lithium faces challenges.

Mining output increased sharply between 2021 and 2025. Australia, Chile, and China expanded production during that period. However, processing capacity, especially outside China, has lagged.

2025 lithium global production

The closure of Albemarle’s Kemerton plant underscores these supply constraints. Western plants face higher labor, energy, and infrastructure costs compared with counterparts in China. These factors make lithium hydroxide production less profitable in some regions.

China dominates downstream lithium processing and battery cell production. The country holds 60–70% of the world’s lithium chemical processing capacity. It also makes around 75% of lithium-ion batteries, based on data from the International Energy Agency.

At the same time, some supply projects have delayed expansion, held back by financing costs, permitting hurdles, and fluctuating prices.

Price volatility has been a feature of the lithium market over the past few years. After reaching multiyear highs in 2022, lithium carbonate prices plunged through 2023 and 2024 due to oversupply. Prices bounced back in late 2025 and further skyrocketed in early 2026.

lithium carbonate spot price

Cost Cuts and Capital Discipline Take Center Stage

Albemarle’s recent actions illustrate how lithium producers respond to shifting conditions.

The company cut costs, lowered capital spending, and sold non-core assets to boost its balance sheet. These moves helped Albemarle generate strong free cash flow even with price swings.

Management noted cost and productivity gains of US$100–150 million aimed for 2026. This will help boost profit margins, particularly in energy storage segments.

Albemarle’s strategy focuses on maintaining stable operations while positioning for long-term demand growth. This includes optimizing asset portfolios, managing supply chains, and shifting production toward lower-cost channels.

Other companies in the lithium sector are also adapting. Some are concentrating on mining expansions, processing partnerships, and technology improvements. Others are exploring recycling and alternative battery chemistries to reduce reliance on lithium.

Miners like Pilbara Minerals, SQM, and Sigma Lithium are expanding and optimizing supply. They do this to stay competitive during price cycles. Refiners like Ganfeng Lithium and Tianqi Lithium are expanding their conversion capacity. They are also integrating their supply chains.

Moreover, firms like Standard Lithium and EnergyX are developing direct lithium extraction methods. These aim to boost recovery and lower water impacts. Recycling companies like Redwood Materials, Li-Cycle, and Umicore are expanding systems. They recover lithium and other metals from used batteries.

Battery makers such as CATL are also investing in sodium-ion technology, which can reduce lithium demand in some market segments.

A Tightening Market in the Making?

The lithium market continues to evolve. There are signs of a structural shift as demand grows faster than supply in some scenarios.

Analysts expect that demand from EVs and energy storage will keep pushing lithium consumption up for the rest of the decade. Albemarle’s plant closure shows that supply issues and processing challenges might tighten the market. This could happen if new capacity isn’t ready soon.

Long-term forecasts suggest many countries and companies will need secure lithium sources. They will also need more downstream processing capacity to meet climate and clean energy goals.

For Albemarle, the mix of cost discipline, demand growth forecasts, and strategic positioning could help the company navigate a market that is both dynamic and competitive.

Is Carbon Capture Losing Steam? Equinor Reassesses CCS Investments

Equinor, long viewed as a global leader in carbon capture and storage (CCS), is slowing its near-term investment plans. The company said market conditions are not yet strong enough to support new large-scale CCS commitments, even though it has decades of technical expertise in the field.

As per reports, during its latest earnings call, CEO Anders Opedal acknowledged that CCS demand is developing more slowly than expected. As a result, Equinor will wait before approving new projects. The company remains willing to invest, but only when it sees clear customer demand, stable policy frameworks, and commercially viable contracts that can deliver solid returns.

In short, the technology is ready. The market signals are not.

Equinor Shifts Focus From Carbon Capture to Core Oil and Gas Returns

The reassessment is now visible in the company’s capital allocation plans. Equinor confirmed it will reduce capital expenditure by about $4 billion across 2026 and 2027 in its latest earnings report. Most of the reductions will affect its low-carbon solutions and power segment, which includes CCS, hydrogen, and ammonia.

At the same time, the company is sharpening its focus on profitability and cash flow. It plans to further develop the Norwegian Continental Shelf, pursue targeted growth in international oil and gas, and build an integrated power business.

  • Equinor also aims to reduce operating costs by 10% in 2026 and deliver around 3% oil and gas production growth that year.
  • For 2026 and 2027, it is targeting a return on average capital employed of roughly 13%.

However, the company’s financial performance has been solid. It reported 6% production growth in the fourth quarter and 3.4% growth for the full year. Portfolio “high-grading” and cost discipline remain central to its strategy. In this context, projects must compete for capital based on returns and risk. At present, large-scale CCS expansion does not yet meet those thresholds.

equinor
Source: Equinor

Low-Carbon Growth and Net-Zero Path

In its sustainability report, the company revealed that it has plans to keep investing in strong upstream projects while cutting emissions. It will prioritize existing infrastructure and factor carbon intensity into every portfolio decision. By producing cost-efficient barrels with lower emissions, Equinor aims to protect long-term value and maintain its license to operate responsibly.

At the same time, the company is investing in the energy transition. It is building renewable power, expanding low-carbon solutions, and applying its offshore engineering and subsurface expertise beyond oil and gas.

  • It targets10–12 GW of installed renewable capacity by 2030 and aims for 30–50 million tonnes of CO₂ transport and storage capacity by 2035.
  • It also plans to reach net zero across Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions by 2050, with a 50% cut in operated emissions by 2030 from 2015 levels.
equinor emissions
Source: Equinor

CCS remains central to these efforts. Equinor has safely stored millions of tonnes of CO₂ offshore Norway and continues developing transport networks connecting European industry to North Sea storage sites. Scaling CCS further will depend on stable policies, strong government support, and clear industrial demand.

low carbon ccs equinor
Source: Equinor

Norway’s Storage Potential Remains Strong

Equinor has spent more than 20 years developing CCS capabilities and has participated in over 40 research projects. Norway’s offshore geology provides a natural advantage. The seabed beneath the North Sea is considered highly suitable for long-term CO₂ storage and could potentially hold the equivalent of 1,000 years of Norway’s emissions.

Technically, the country is well-positioned to serve as a major European CO₂ storage hub. However, geology alone does not guarantee investment. Storage capacity must match real and committed capture volumes. Without enough industrial CO₂ flows secured under contract, storage sites cannot operate at scale.

Carbon Capture and Storage: A Growing Market With Real Barriers

As per Fortune Business Insights, the global carbon capture and sequestration market is still projected to expand. In 2025, the market was valued at around $4.51 billion. It is expected to approach $20 billion by 2034, reflecting strong long-term growth projections. North America currently leads the sector, supported by government incentives and operational CCS facilities.

ccs carbon capture and storage

CCS technology captures carbon dioxide from industrial sources or power plants, transports it by pipeline or ship, and stores it deep underground in geological formations. Storage often takes place in saline aquifers or depleted oil and gas reservoirs. In some cases, CO₂ is used for enhanced oil recovery, increasing oil production while storing emissions underground.

Despite this momentum, the industry faces clear challenges. CCS infrastructure requires high upfront capital. Projects involve complex regulation, long development timelines, and cross-border coordination. Most importantly, they require dependable revenue streams backed by firm customer commitments.

Equinor’s decision reflects these economic realities.

Decarbonization Delays Weaken Near-Term CCS Demand

The company emphasized that one of the biggest challenges is changing customer timelines. Just a few years ago, many industrial buyers of natural gas were actively exploring hydrogen supply and CO₂ transport and storage services. Decarbonization plans appeared urgent.

Today, that urgency has softened. Many of those same customers continue to buy gas, but they have pushed major emissions reduction commitments further into the future. Instead of focusing on projects before 2030, companies are now extending targets beyond that date.

This shift has weakened near-term demand for CCS services. Large storage projects depend on aggregating significant volumes of captured CO₂ under long-term contracts. Without those volumes, it becomes difficult to justify multi-billion-dollar infrastructure investments.

Although regulatory frameworks for CO₂ transport and storage have improved, progress on capture facilities and permitting has slowed. Policies are advancing, but the pipeline of ready-to-build projects is not growing at the same pace. For CCS to work commercially, capture projects, transport networks, storage hubs, and long-term contracts must move forward together. Right now, those pieces are not fully aligned.

A Reality Check for the CCS Sector

Equinor’s cautious stance highlights a broader reality facing the carbon capture industry. CCS is widely seen as essential for decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors such as cement, steel, and chemicals. Many global net-zero pathways depend on large-scale deployment before 2030.

Yet technical readiness is not enough. Projects require predictable carbon pricing, stable long-term policy support, and customers willing to sign binding agreements. Without those elements, even experienced developers will hesitate.

The slowdown does not signal the end of CCS. Market forecasts still point to significant expansion over the next decade. However, deployment may not move as quickly as earlier expectations suggested.

Equinor’s message is clear. Climate ambition must translate into commercial commitment. Until customer demand strengthens and revenue visibility improves, capital will remain cautious. And for now, it is choosing discipline over speed. The company stands ready to invest when the economics make sense. But it will not move forward on optimism alone.

Canada Invests C$97M to Supercharge EV Charging and Cut Transport Emissions

Canada’s federal government has announced C$97.3 million (almost US$72 million) in new funding for clean transportation projects across the country. It was announced by Natural Resources Canada and other federal departments. The money will support 155 projects in provinces and territories nationwide.

The investment aims to expand electric vehicle (EV) charging, help freight fleets reduce emissions, and increase public awareness of clean transportation.

The Honourable Julie Dabrusin, Minister of Environment and Climate Change and Nature, stated,

“We are making it easier, cleaner, and more affordable for Canadians to get where they need to go by investing in new EV charging infrastructure… Making the switch to an electric vehicle reduces greenhouse gas emissions, and with the EV Affordability Program, drivers can save up to $5000, making EVs more accessible for Canadians to go electric.”

Transportation is Canada’s largest source of greenhouse gas emissions. According to Environment and Climate Change Canada, transport accounted for about 22–25% of national emissions in 2023, totaling almost 157 million tonnes of CO₂ equivalent. Passenger vehicles and freight trucks make up most of these emissions.

canada GHG emisssions by sector
Source: Government of Canada, ECCC

Reducing transport emissions is key to Canada’s goal of reaching net-zero emissions by 2050.

Charging Ahead: Billions Flow Into EV Infrastructure

The biggest part of the C$97.3 million package, C$84.4 million, will support EV charging infrastructure. This funding comes from Canada’s Zero Emission Vehicle Infrastructure Program (ZEVIP). It will support 122 projects that will install more than 8,000 new EV chargers across the country.

Canada already has more than 30,000 public charging ports installed, according to Natural Resources Canada. The new chargers will expand coverage in cities, rural areas, highways, workplaces, and multi-unit residential buildings.

Some major recipients include:

  • Pollution Probe Foundation: C$7.3 million for 495 chargers.
  • Manitoba Motor Dealers Association: C$6.5 million for up to 520 chargers.
  • DP World Canada: C$4.375 million for 111 chargers.
  • Purolator Inc.: C$2.575 million for 393 chargers.

Municipalities such as Calgary, Vancouver, Regina, Kelowna, Mississauga, and St. John’s are also receiving funding.

The federal government has set a target for 100% of new light-duty vehicle sales to be zero-emission by 2035. Expanding charging infrastructure supports this goal and helps reduce range concerns for drivers.

Greening the Freight Network

The announcement also includes C$5.7 million for three projects under the Green Freight Program. Medium- and heavy-duty trucks play a major role in freight transport. These vehicles consume large amounts of diesel fuel and produce significant emissions.

The Green Freight funding will help fleets with the following:

  • Upgrade engines and vehicles,
  • Improve fuel efficiency,
  • Adopt low-carbon technologies, and
  • Improve logistics planning.

Freight trucks represent about 37% of Canada’s transportation emissions, according to federal data. Cutting fuel use in this segment can reduce both operating costs and carbon output.

These projects aim to improve fleet performance while supporting Canada’s broader climate targets.

Education and Indigenous-led Initiatives in the EV Shift

The remaining C$7.2 million will support 30 education and awareness projects across Canada. These initiatives will provide information about EV adoption, charging technology, and clean fuels. They will also help train workers in EV infrastructure installation and maintenance.

Of the 30 projects, 11 are Indigenous-led. These projects focus on increasing awareness and access to clean transportation in Indigenous communities and northern regions.

Activities in this program include:

  • Community test-drive events
  • Skills training workshops
  • Public outreach on clean fuel options

The advocates believe that education helps build confidence in electric mobility and supports long-term adoption.

Part of a Bigger National Electrification Push

The C$97.3 million funding is part of Canada’s broader Automotive Strategy and National Charging Infrastructure Strategy, announced in early 2026.

In addition to this funding, the Canada Infrastructure Bank (CIB) increased its charging and hydrogen refueling program by C$1 billion. This brings the total funding in that initiative to C$1.5 billion. The CIB program aims to support up to 5,400 new public fast-charging stations across the country.

The government also continues to provide purchase incentives for zero-emission vehicles. Federal rebates of up to C$5,000 are available for eligible EV buyers under existing programs.

Together, these measures aim to reduce emissions while strengthening Canada’s auto sector and supply chains. More so, the sector’s GHG emissions keep rising again post-COVID 19 pandemic.

Supporting Canada’s Net-Zero and 2035 ZEV Targets

This funding supports Canada’s national climate targets. The federal government plans to cut emissions by 40–45% from 2005 levels by 2030. It also aims for net-zero emissions by 2050.

Canada net zero goals 2030 target
Source: Canadian Government

This commitment is part of the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act. Transportation is the biggest source of emissions in the country, and so cutting vehicle emissions is key to reaching these goals.

Canada has set rules for new light-duty vehicles. By 2035, all sales must be zero-emission. There are interim goals of 20% by 2026 and 60% by 2030. Expanding EV charging helps meet those sales targets by making electric vehicles more practical for drivers across urban and rural areas.

Also, the federal government has set national infrastructure targets of deploying 84,500 EV chargers and 45 hydrogen refueling stations by 2029. These targets aim to ensure that charging and refueling networks grow in step with rising zero-emission vehicle adoption across the country.

Cleaner freight projects also support Canada’s broader plan to cut emissions from medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. The C$97.3 million funding supports Canada’s long-term move to a lower-carbon transportation system. It combines infrastructure investment, fleet upgrades, and education programs.

Closing the Emissions Gap in Transport

Transportation emissions remain high in Canada. Power plant emissions have fallen in recent years, but transport emissions have been slower to drop.

Canada Transport Sector GHG Emissions (1990-2023)
Data Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)

Electric vehicles produce zero tailpipe emissions. Canada’s electricity grid is about 83% non-emitting. So, when powered by it, EVs can greatly reduce carbon output. Heavy-duty vehicle upgrades and freight efficiency improvements also provide measurable reductions.

The new C$97.3 million funding helps close infrastructure gaps and prepares communities for increased EV adoption. It also sends a signal to private investors. Public funding often helps unlock additional private capital in clean energy and infrastructure projects.

Moreover, the installation of 8,000 new chargers will increase national charging coverage. Freight modernization projects will reduce diesel use, while education programs will improve awareness and workforce skills.

These steps support Canada’s commitment to reducing emissions by 40–45% below 2005 levels by 2030, while moving toward net-zero by 2050.

The C$97.3 million investment is one part of a broader national effort. As charging networks grow and fleets modernize, Canada’s transportation sector may gradually lower its carbon footprint. Further policy support, infrastructure development, and private investment will determine the pace of that transition.

China Expands Carbon Reporting to Airlines and Heavy Industry in Major Climate Disclosure Shift

China has updated and expanded its carbon reporting rules to cover new sectors. The changes are part of the country’s effort to improve transparency on climate risks and emissions.

Officials have extended carbon reporting requirements to include the airline industry and major industrial sectors such as petrochemicals and copper producers. This is a major shift in how companies disclose climate data and manage emissions.

China also introduced a new national climate reporting standard in late 2025. This standard aims to align with global best practices and to make climate data clearer and more useful to investors and regulators.

The changes reflect China’s strategy to meet its climate targets and to build stronger systems for environmental data. They also show how the Chinese reporting regime is becoming more structured and consistent.

Inside China’s New Climate Disclosure Rulebook

In December 2025, China’s Ministry of Finance and eight other ministries issued the Corporate Sustainable Disclosure Standard No. 1 – Climate (Trial). This is a national framework for climate disclosures.

The standard is based on the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. It focuses on reporting climate risks, opportunities, and impacts.

Under the new framework, companies are expected to report on their governance, strategy, risk and opportunity management, and metrics and targets.

The Chinese framework also requires more extensive emissions data, including value chain emissions in many cases. This goes beyond basic climate risk reporting.

Currently, the Chinese authorities present the standard as a trial (voluntary phase). However, they plan to expand its use and make parts mandatory over time. They will start with large companies and key sectors.

High-Emission Sectors Now Under the Spotlight

The newly announced carbon reporting expansion will affect energy-intensive and high-impact sectors, not only traditional industries:

  • Airlines: This includes carriers operating domestic and international flights.
  • Petrochemical firms: Companies that refine oil and produce chemical products.
  • Copper producers: Firms involved in mining and processing copper.

These sectors consume large amounts of energy and generate significant greenhouse gas emissions.

The aviation sector accounts for about 2% of global energy-related CO₂ emissions, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). In 2023, aviation emissions reached roughly 950 million tonnes of CO₂, returning close to pre-pandemic levels. China is one of the world’s largest aviation markets, and fuel combustion remains the dominant source of airline emissions.

The petrochemical industry is also highly carbon-intensive. The IEA reports that petrochemicals account for about 14% of global oil demand and 8% of global gas demand. China is the world’s largest producer and consumer of many petrochemical products, making emissions monitoring in this sector especially important.

Copper production is another energy-heavy industry. The International Copper Association states that producing refined copper needs 2 to 4 tonnes of CO₂ for each tonne of copper. This varies by ore grade and energy source.

China produces over 40% of the world’s refined copper, says the International Energy Agency and global metals stats. Smelting and refining processes consume large amounts of electricity, often generated from fossil fuels.

china copper 2025 production
Chart from Reuters

From Patchwork Rules to a National Framework

The new reporting requirements and standards are part of a wider shift in China’s climate disclosure regime. The country has been building a national corporate climate reporting framework since 2024. This includes guidance from stock exchanges, government agencies, and new national standards.

In January 2026, the national climate reporting standard was formally released. It follows the IFRS S2 climate disclosure framework, but it adds China-specific details. One key requirement is to report the actual business impact on the climate.

Authorities say they’re working on guidelines for industries with high emissions. These include power, steel, coal, petroleum, fertilizer, aluminum, hydrogen, cement, and automobiles, among others.

The current trial phase mainly targets listed companies. But it plans to expand to non-listed firms and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) later on.

China aims to make its climate disclosure regime more comprehensive and quantitative. Companies are expected to shift from narrative statements to detailed data reporting as they develop their climate information systems.

Driving Data to Deliver on Dual-Carbon Goals

As the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitter, China aims to have its National Emissions Trading System (ETS? cover all major emitting industries by 2027 to help achieve its “dual-carbon” goals:

IEA’s suggested path towards carbon neutrality for China

Achieving these goals requires accurate, timely, and comparable emissions data from companies. Improved reporting helps regulators, investors, and the public understand corporate climate risks and progress.

Standardized disclosure can help cut down on greenwashing. This happens when companies overstate or misrepresent their climate performance. Clear rules make it harder to present incomplete or misleading data.

Those who fail to comply will face consequences. For instance, a power plant in Ningxia was recently fined 424 million yuan ($58.5 million) for missing compliance deadlines.

Better climate data also supports green finance. Investors use emissions and climate information to assess risks and make decisions about capital allocation. Reliable data can help direct funding toward low-carbon technologies and projects.

The expanded rules also fit within China’s broader strategy to build a national carbon market and improve its emissions trading system. This market already covers a growing share of the economy and underpins carbon pricing across industries.

The move also responds to global pressures. For example, the European Union’s carbon taxes on imports impact Chinese exporters in these sectors.

China’s ETS and the Use of Carbon Offsets

This data collection phase is a precursor to integrating the industries into China’s ETS. The system initially covers only the power sector, but it has added steel, aluminum, and cement.

The covered companies can use a limited number of carbon offsets to meet compliance requirements. Under the ETS design, entities can use China Certified Emissions Reductions (CCERs). These must come from projects not included in the national ETS. But companies can surrender CCERs for up to 5% of their verified emissions.

Also, only CCER credits from projects in the new national CCER program can be used after January 2025. This offset flexibility gives companies an option to meet part of their compliance obligations while broader reporting and reduction measures take effect.

China ETS market 2030
Source: WEF Asia’s Carbon Markets Strategic Imperatives for Corporations, 2025.

The system currently regulates more than 5 billion tonnes of CO₂ annually from the power industry alone. Analysts estimate that once the additional sectors are fully included, the ETS could cover between 8.7 and 10.6 billion tonnes of CO₂ by the late 2020s — representing a significant share of China’s total emissions.

A Transparency Push With Global Implications

China’s expanded reporting rules represent a clear shift toward greater transparency in corporate climate data. Better reporting helps policymakers track progress toward national climate goals. It also helps businesses understand their own climate risks and opportunities.

For investors, richer data support more informed decisions about sustainable investments. This can help channel capital to cleaner technologies and low-carbon business models.

For the global climate community, China’s moves may influence reporting norms in other markets. As the world’s largest emitter, China’s reporting regime could shape climate disclosure expectations elsewhere.

Uranium Prices 2026: Supply Crunch and Rising Demand Fuel a Nuclear Bull Market

Uranium is back in the spotlight. In 2026, uranium prices are climbing to levels not seen in years, fueled by supply constraints, policy support, and rising demand from nuclear power and AI-driven data centers. What was once a quiet energy commodity is now a strategic asset at the heart of the global energy transition.

Sprott Drives Uranium Price Rally with Strategic Accumulation

As per media reports, the global uranium market entered 2026 with strong momentum, as spot uranium prices surged by roughly 25% in January, surpassing $100 per pound for the first time in two years. This sharp rise reflects growing confidence in nuclear energy and mounting concerns about long-term supply constraints.

According to Sprott Asset Management, the rally toward 2024 peak levels indicates a stronger supportive backdrop than last year. In 2025, prices were volatile—falling in the early months before rebounding from the low $60s to the high $80s in the second half. Today, fundamentals appear more favorable.

uranium prices
Source: Trading Economics

Jacob White, Sprott’s ETF products director, noted that the January surge signals a shift in investor focus. Capital is moving away from downstream nuclear themes and returning to the upstream uranium supply chain, largely due to clearer policy signals and improving fundamentals.

Moreover, Sprott has been one of the largest buyers of physical uranium, adding around 4 million pounds to its uranium fund this year and bringing total holdings to nearly 79 million pounds. This accumulation highlights how investors increasingly view uranium as a strategic, long-term asset rather than a cyclical commodity.

Financial Buyers Are Redefining the Market

Institutional investors are transforming uranium into a financial asset class. Funds that accumulate physical uranium create additional demand beyond traditional utilities, removing supply from the spot market and amplifying price volatility.

Unlike utilities, financial buyers are less sensitive to short-term price swings. Their participation reduces downside risk and strengthens the long-term bull market thesis.

Strong Policy Support Is Driving Uranium Prices

Government policy is playing an increasingly influential role in shaping uranium prices in 2026. The U.S. government’s Section 232 framework on critical minerals explicitly designates uranium as vital for energy security and national defense, placing it alongside rare earths and lithium as a strategic resource.

At the same time, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) committed $2.7 billion over the next decade to expand domestic uranium enrichment. The investment aims to reduce reliance on foreign suppliers while supporting the next phase of nuclear power growth.

AI and Data Centers Boost Uranium Demand

This policy shift reflects a broader change in perception. Nuclear is now viewed as essential for meeting rising electricity demand, powering AI infrastructure, ensuring industrial resilience, and achieving long-term climate goals.

As tech companies increasingly recognize nuclear as a strategic power source, they create a new, enduring layer of uranium demand. Analysts project that the uranium market could expand to $60.5 billion by 2030, with AI-driven demand accelerating this growth.

Enrichment Bottlenecks Highlight Structural Weaknesses

Despite policy support, uranium enrichment remains a major bottleneck. Most reactors operate on low-enriched uranium (LEU), while advanced reactors—including small modular reactors (SMRs)—require high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU).

Currently, the U.S. produces less than 1% of global enrichment capacity and relies heavily on foreign suppliers. New restrictions on Russian uranium imports starting in 2028 further emphasize energy security risks.

Although the DOE’s investment aims to rebuild domestic enrichment capacity, new facilities will take years to become operational. Consequently, near-term enrichment constraints will continue to support higher uranium prices.

Mining Remains the Weakest Link

While enrichment is a challenge, upstream mining remains the weakest link in the nuclear fuel cycle. The U.S. Energy Information Administration reported that domestic uranium concentrate production fell 44% in Q3 2025, to about 329,623 pounds of U₃O₈, from only six operating facilities, mainly in Wyoming and Texas.

uranium demand us

This decline highlights a systemic problem. The nuclear fuel cycle requires coordinated growth across mining, processing, enrichment, and fuel fabrication. Advancements in one segment without corresponding growth in the others create structural bottlenecks.

In the short term, declining production adds bullish pressure. Over the long term, decades of underinvestment in mining point to a persistent supply deficit, which could keep prices elevated.

Uranium Supply and Demand Outlook

Global demand for reactor fuel continued to grow in 2025. The World Nuclear Association estimates uranium requirements at about 68,920 tonnes, or roughly 77,000 tonnes of uranium oxide, up 3% from 2024.

Looking ahead, demand is expected to rise sharply. Under the reference scenario, global uranium needs could reach 107,000 tonnes by 2040, and under a higher-growth scenario, up to 204,000 tonnes.

This growth aligns with increasing nuclear capacity, which is projected to climb to 438 gigawatts by 2030, and nearly 746 gigawatts by 2040. The trend points to a long-term, multi-decade increase in uranium demand.

Uranium demand and supply
Data Source: WNA

The U.S. also plans to quadruple nuclear capacity by 2050 and have 10 new large reactors under construction by 2030. If achieved, this expansion would dramatically increase uranium demand.

The timing mismatch between rising demand and the slow pace of mine development creates a structural imbalance between supply and demand. Analysts also speculate that the U.S. government could take equity stakes in uranium miners in exchange for long-term offtake agreements with price floors. This move would further tighten supply and support higher prices.

Kazatomprom’s 2026 Outlook Signals Tight Margins

Recent reports tell that Kazatomprom plans to raise uranium output by about 9% in 2026, targeting 71.5–75.4 million pounds of U₃O₈, slightly below state caps but above analyst forecasts.

However, new ISR projects and brownfield expansions take time, so near-term supply remains constrained, keeping upward pressure on prices.

2026: Why the Uranium Bull Market Could Continue

Given these dynamics, uranium prices could continue trending higher throughout 2026. Government investment, supply bottlenecks, and AI-driven demand are reshaping uranium’s role in the global energy mix. Prices could approach $92 per pound or more, particularly if contracting accelerates or financial buyers continue stockpiling physical uranium.

Uranium is evolving from a traditional commodity into a strategic pillar of the global energy transition. Policy support, structural supply constraints, institutional demand, and AI-driven electricity requirements are creating a compelling long-term bull case.

For investors and utilities alike, the uranium market is signaling that big moves—and big opportunities—are on the horizon.

Climate Reality Check: Only 12% of Global Companies Align With 1.5°C Goal, MSCI Reports

A new report from MSCI shows that many listed companies are still not aligned with the world’s most ambitious climate goal. The findings suggest that progress is uneven. Some companies are moving in the right direction. Many are not yet cutting emissions fast enough.

According to MSCI’s latest Transition Finance Tracker, about 38% of companies in the MSCI All Country World Investable Market Index (ACWI IMI) have emissions trajectories that are aligned with limiting global warming to 2°C or below. This includes 12% aligned with 1.5°C or less and 26% aligned between 1.5°C and 2°C.

However, only about 12% of companies are aligned with the stricter 1.5°C goal set under the Paris Agreement. The remaining companies are on pathways that imply warming above 2°C.

In fact, 36% of companies fall in the range above 2°C but below 3.2°C, while 26% exceed 3.2°C. Overall, the median listed company trajectory implies 3°C (5.4°F) of warming above preindustrial levels this century.

Projected temperature alignment of the world’s listed companies
Source: MSCI

MSCI uses a tool called the Implied Temperature Rise (ITR) metric. This tool estimates how much global temperatures would rise if the whole economy followed the same emissions pathway as a given company. It looks at aggregate emissions, sector-specific carbon budgets, and corporate climate targets.

Inside the ITR: Measuring Corporate Warming Impact

MSCI’s ITR metric helps investors understand climate risk. It compares a company’s projected emissions with global carbon budgets that align with temperature goals. The dataset used in this estimate covers roughly 95% of ACWI IMI constituents, as about 5% lack sufficient data for the calculation.

If a company’s emissions plan fits within a 1.5°C carbon budget, it is considered aligned with the most ambitious Paris goal. If it fits within a 2°C budget, it is considered moderately aligned. If not, it implies higher warming.

  • The Paris Agreement aims to limit global warming to well below 2°C, and preferably to 1.5°C, compared with pre-industrial levels.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has warned that global emissions must fall by about 43% by 2030, compared with 2019 levels, to keep 1.5°C within reach.

MSCI’s data shows that most companies are not reducing emissions at that pace. The report also notes that its latest warming estimate is three-tenths of a degree higher than the previous quarter due to a methodological update that removed a cap on how much companies could exceed their carbon budgets.

This gap matters because corporate emissions play a major role in global totals. The MSCI ACWI IMI includes 8,225 companies and captures about 99% of the global equity investment opportunity set as of Dec. 31, 2025.

Winners and Laggards: How Sectors Stack Up on Climate

The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) gives a clear look at how corporate climate performance differs by industry.

The TPI report looked at more than 2,000 major companies. These companies have a total market value of about US$87 trillion. The focus was on their climate governance and progress on emissions. It found that 98% of companies lack credible plans to shift capital away from carbon-intensive assets.

corporate climate by sector TPI
Source: TPI

The report warns that 554 companies in 12 high-emitting sectors are on a dangerous path. Their current emissions are on track to overshoot the 1.5°C carbon budget by 61% between 2020 and 2050. These same pathways will also likely exceed the 2°C budget by 13% during that same period.

The analysis suggests that many firms consider climate issues in daily decisions. However, few have solid long-term transition plans.

TPI also shows clear differences in sector progress. For example, automotive and electricity companies reduced emissions intensity nearly five times faster between 2020 and 2023 than cement and steel firms. Conversely, sectors such as oil & gas, aluminum, and coal mining remain among the most misaligned with Paris goals.

This highlights that while some industries are beginning to cut emissions and improve governance, most still need stronger transition plans and clearer capital alignment to meet global climate targets.

Climate Alignment Is Now a Financial Risk Indicator

Findings reveal that climate alignment is not only an environmental issue. It is also a financial one.

Governments are tightening climate policies. Carbon pricing systems now cover about 23% of global greenhouse gas emissions, according to the World Bank’s State and Trends of Carbon Pricing report.

More countries are setting net-zero targets. Regulations are increasing disclosure requirements. Investors face growing pressure to measure climate risk in portfolios.

The MSCI report also shows that 19% of listed companies had a climate target validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) as of Dec. 31, 2025, up from 14% a year earlier. Meanwhile, 32% of companies have set a companywide net-zero target, and 60% have published some form of climate commitment.

Companies that are not aligned with global climate goals may face higher regulatory costs, stranded assets, or weaker demand in the future. On the other hand, companies aligned with 1.5°C or 2°C pathways may benefit from new markets and lower transition risk.

MSCI’s data helps investors compare companies on this basis. The 38% alignment figure gives a broad snapshot of progress across global markets.

Progress, But Not Fast Enough

The fact that 38% of companies align with 2°C or below shows improvement compared with past years. Corporate climate reporting has expanded. More companies now set net-zero targets, and many publish science-based targets.

Disclosure rates have also improved. As of Dec. 31, 2024, 79% of listed companies disclosed Scope 1 and/or Scope 2 emissions, up from 76% a year earlier. A majority, 56%, reported at least some Scope 3 emissions, up from 51%.

Emissions disclosure by listed companies
Source: MSCI

Still, MSCI’s findings show that ambition and action are not always the same. Some companies set long-term targets but delay near-term reductions. Others rely heavily on carbon offsets instead of direct emissions cuts. In some cases, emissions intensity improves while absolute emissions remain high.

The IPCC has made clear that global emissions must fall sharply this decade. Delayed action increases future costs and transition risks.

A Fossil-Fuel-Heavy World Complicates the Shift

Global energy-related CO₂ emissions reached a record 37.8 billion tonnes in 2023, according to the International Energy Agency. While renewable energy growth has accelerated, fossil fuels still account for around 80% of global primary energy supply.

These global figures explain why corporate alignment remains challenging. Many companies operate in economies that still depend on fossil energy.

MSCI’s report reflects this broader reality. Corporate alignment depends on system-wide change, not just company-level pledges. Moreover, the report’s findings come as corporate climate pledges continue to rise sharply.

According to the SBTi, the number of companies setting both near-term and net-zero science-based targets surged 227% between late 2023 and mid-2025. Companies setting near-term targets alone grew by nearly 97% over the same period.

Companies with SBTi commitments or targets
Source: SBTi

By the end of 2023, only 17% of companies with validated targets had both near-term and net-zero commitments. That share rose to 33% in 2024 and reached 38% by mid-2025.

The figures show that more companies are formalizing climate commitments. However, MSCI’s data indicates that only 12% of listed firms align with 1.5°C, while 38% align with 2°C or below — highlighting a gap between target-setting and full emissions alignment.

The Road Ahead: Bridging the 1.5°C Gap

The headline figure shows that more than one-third of listed firms are moving in a direction consistent with global climate goals. That gap is significant.

To meet the Paris Agreement’s goals, alignment will need to increase quickly across all sectors. This means faster emissions cuts, clearer short-term targets, and stronger capital allocation toward low-carbon technologies. Today’s alignment rate suggests progress is underway, but it also shows that most companies still have to work harder to be on track to a 1.5°C path.

How Power Demand, Emissions, and China Will Shape the Global Energy System to 2030

Global electricity demand is entering a decisive growth phase. IEA’s 2026 electricity report forecasts that over the next five years, power consumption is set to rise faster than at any time in recent decades, marking a structural shift in how the world uses energy. This trend reflects the rapid electrification of industries, transport, buildings, and digital infrastructure, alongside climate-driven demand for cooling and heating.

Unlike previous cycles, electricity demand is no longer simply following economic growth. Instead, power consumption is becoming a leading driver of economic activity. This shift signals the arrival of what analysts increasingly call the “Age of Electricity,” where power is the backbone of modern economies and decarbonization strategies.

Let’s deep dive into IEA’s report here to understand the present and the future of electricity demand.

Electricity Demand Breaks Away from Economic Growth

Global electricity demand is projected to grow at an average annual rate of around 3.6% between 2026 and 2030, significantly faster than the growth seen over the past decade. In contrast, total energy demand will rise much more slowly, meaning electricity will expand at least 2.5 times faster than overall energy consumption.

This divergence marks a fundamental change. Historically, electricity consumption closely tracked GDP growth. That relationship is now reversing. In 2024, electricity demand outpaced economic growth globally for the first time in three decades outside of crisis periods, and this trend is expected to continue.

Several structural drivers are accelerating this shift:

  • Electrification of transport, especially electric vehicles
  • Expansion of data centres and artificial intelligence workloads
  • Rising demand for air conditioning due to climate change
  • Industrial electrification and reshoring
  • Growth in heat pumps and electric heating

Together, these trends are pushing electricity to become the dominant form of final energy consumption.

Emerging economies will remain the main engine of demand growth, accounting for roughly 80% of new electricity consumption through 2030. However, advanced economies are also seeing a resurgence after more than a decade of stagnation, driven by digitalization and electrification.

GLOBAL electricity demand

Global Power Mix: Renewables and Nuclear Take Half the Market

Globally, renewables and nuclear are on track to supply around 50% of electricity generation by 2030. Solar is the fastest-growing source, contributing more than half of annual generation additions.

Renewable generation is expected to grow by about 1,000 TWh per year through 2030, with solar alone adding more than 600 TWh annually. Nuclear power is also gaining momentum, supported by reactor restarts, lifetime extensions, and new builds in emerging economies.

However, coal will likely remain the single largest source of electricity in 2030, even as its share declines. Natural gas generation is also expected to rise, driven by US demand and fuel switching in the Middle East.

Overall, renewables, nuclear, and gas are projected to meet all net new electricity demand globally, displacing coal in aggregate but not eliminating it.

global electricity generation

Advanced Economies Re-Enter the Demand Growth Cycle

Electricity demand in advanced economies is rising again after a prolonged period of stagnation. In the United States, demand is projected to grow by around 2% annually through 2030, with data centres accounting for roughly half of the increase.

In the European Union, electricity demand is expected to grow at around 2% per year, though consumption may not return to pre-2021 levels until the late 2020s. Other advanced economies, including Japan, Canada, Korea, and Australia, are also seeing accelerating growth.

This resurgence reflects:

  • AI and cloud computing expansion
  • Electrification of heating and transport
  • Industrial reshoring and new manufacturing facilities
  • Climate-driven cooling demand

Electricity is becoming a core input for economic competitiveness in digital and industrial sectors.

Power Sector Emissions: Plateau but Not Yet Declining Fast Enough

Electricity generation remains the largest source of energy-related carbon dioxide emissions, producing roughly 13.9 billion tonnes of CO₂ per year. After rising between 2022 and 2024, power sector emissions stabilised in 2025.

Looking ahead, emissions are expected to plateau through 2030, rather than decline sharply. This reflects the rapid growth in electricity demand, offsetting gains from clean power deployment.

power sector emissions

The carbon intensity of electricity has already fallen by around 14% over the past decade, and it is expected to decline faster as low-emission generation expands. This decline is mainly due to more renewable energy and strong nuclear power output.

  • The trend is expected to accelerate. CO₂ intensity is forecast to fall by around 3.7% per year, dropping from 435 g CO₂ per kWh in 2025 to about 360 g CO₂ per kWh by 2030.

However, absolute emissions reductions will be harder to achieve due to rising demand. China’s trajectory is particularly critical. As the world’s largest power market and emitter,  its pace of renewable deployment, coal retirement, and grid reform will heavily influence global climate outcomes.

power sector emissions
Source: IEA

China: The Single Largest Driver of Global Electricity Growth

China will remain the central force shaping global electricity demand over the next decade. Despite slower economic growth and structural shifts toward services, China’s sheer scale means it will contribute close to half of global electricity demand growth through 2030.

Electricity demand in China rose by just over 5% in 2025, down from roughly 7% in 2024. Looking ahead, demand is expected to grow at an average of around 4.9% annually between 2026 and 2030, slower than the past decade but still massive in absolute terms.

The drivers are multifaceted:

  • Continued electrification across industry and households
  • Expansion of manufacturing, including clean energy supply chains
  • Growing services sector electricity use
  • Rising cooling demand due to extreme heat events
  • Digital infrastructure and smart technologies
china renewables
Source: IEA

China’s power demand growth over the next five years alone is expected to match the current total electricity consumption of the European Union. This highlights the scale of China’s influence on global power markets, fuel demand, and emissions trajectories.

At the same time, efficiency improvements are tempering demand growth. Government policies targeting lower energy intensity and more efficient appliances are helping reduce electricity use per unit of GDP. However, these gains are not enough to offset the scale of electrification and economic activity.

MUST READ: 

Renewables Surge, But Grid Constraints Loom Large

China’s renewable energy buildout continues at an unprecedented pace. Solar generation jumped by more than 40% in 2025, while wind grew by double digits. The share of variable renewable energy (VRE) in China’s power mix reached around 22%, up sharply from the previous year.

Record capacity additions are transforming the power system. More than 300 GW of solar and over 100 GW of wind were added in a single year, driven partly by developers rushing to complete projects before the end of fixed-price tariffs.

However, this rapid expansion is creating new challenges. Curtailment rates for solar and wind increased, reflecting grid congestion and integration constraints. This highlights a global issue: generation is growing faster than grid infrastructure.

Coal’s Role Is Changing, Not Disappearing

Despite the renewable boom, coal remains a dominant force in China’s power sector. Coal-fired generation declined slightly in 2025, but coal still accounts for the largest share of electricity generation.

China’s coal share is expected to fall from around 55% in 2025 to about 43% by 2030, reflecting the rapid expansion of renewables and nuclear. However, coal capacity continues to grow, driven by projects approved during the 2022–2023 permitting boom.

Rather than serving as baseload power, coal plants are increasingly being used as flexibility and backup resources to support variable renewables. Capacity utilisation is expected to decline, even as installed capacity rises.

This shift illustrates a broader global trend: coal is becoming a reliability asset rather than a growth engine, but its persistence complicates decarbonization efforts.

Grids and Flexibility: The Hidden Bottleneck

The transition to an electricity-centric energy system depends on grid expansion and flexibility. Investment in grids currently lags far behind generation capacity additions. Worldwide, more than 2,500 GW of projects are stuck in grid connection queues, including renewables, storage, and large industrial loads such as data centres. Without faster grid expansion and smarter system management, power shortages and curtailment risks will rise.

Meeting projected demand will require around 50% higher annual grid investment by 2030, rising from roughly USD 400 billion today. Without this, congestion, curtailment, and reliability risks will increase.

Flexibility solutions are also scaling rapidly. Utility-scale battery deployment is accelerating, especially in regions with high solar and wind penetration. However, conventional power plants still provide most flexibility today.

Policy reforms, grid-enhancing technologies, and non-firm connection agreements could unlock 1,200–1,600 GW of stalled projects, significantly accelerating the transition.

grid management

The Global Outlook: A Power-Centric Energy System

The global energy system is undergoing a structural transformation. Electricity is becoming the dominant vector for economic growth, digitalization, and decarbonization. Demand growth is accelerating across emerging and advanced economies, with China playing the most decisive role.

Renewables and nuclear are rapidly expanding, but coal and gas will remain part of the mix for reliability. Emissions are stabilising but not falling fast enough to meet climate targets, highlighting the scale of the challenge ahead.

The next five years will be critical. Grid expansion, flexibility solutions, and policy reforms will determine whether the Age of Electricity delivers a clean, affordable, and resilient energy future—or locks in new infrastructure bottlenecks and emissions risks.

Nuclear’s Next Chapter: newcleo Raises $88M to Scale SMR Powered by Nuclear Waste

newcleo, a European nuclear technology company, announced that it has raised €75 million (about USD $88 million) in a new funding round. The cash will help the company build and develop advanced small nuclear reactors powered by recycled nuclear waste. The financing is a sign of growing investor interest in clean and low-carbon energy solutions.

Newcleo also said that it has now raised more than $124 million in total for 2025. The company was founded in September 2021 and is based in Paris, France. The nuclear energy developer also operates in Italy, the UK, Belgium, and Slovakia, with roughly 1,000 employees.

What newcleo’s Technology Does: Turning Nuclear Waste into Usable Fuel

newcleo develops a type of advanced nuclear technology known as lead-cooled fast reactors (LFRs). These reactors are a form of small modular reactor (SMR).

Unlike traditional nuclear reactors that use fresh uranium fuel, newcleo’s design aims to use reprocessed nuclear waste as fuel. This means existing waste from older reactors could become a power source.

Using nuclear waste as fuel is intended to have two benefits:

  • It could reduce long-term waste storage needs.
  • It may help lower the carbon footprint of nuclear power.

Lead-cooled fast reactors also use liquid lead to transfer heat out of the core. The liquid lead acts as a coolant and enables the reactor to operate at high temperatures without high pressure.

This reactor type is still under development and not yet in wide commercial operation. But companies like newcleo believe it could play a role in future clean energy systems.

Heavy Industry and Investors Double Down

The €75 million funding round brought in both new and existing investors. New industrial backers included heavy industry groups such as:

  • Danieli & C, a steel mill manufacturer
  • Cementir Holding, a cement and concrete producer
  • Orion Valves, an industrial valve maker
  • NextChem, an energy engineering firm

Existing financial backers also participated. These included Kairos, Indaco Ventures, Azimut Investments, the CERN pension fund, and Walter Tosto (industrial engineering).

The mix of industrial and financial investors shows that newcleo’s technology draws interest from companies looking for reliable, low-carbon power and firms focused on clean energy investments.

Scaling from Design to Deployment

newcleo said the fresh funding will support several key parts of its business. The company highlighted progress in:

  • Licensing and regulatory approval processes
  • Research and development (R&D) of reactors and fuel systems
  • Vertical integration of technology and manufacturing
  • Geographic expansion in key markets like Europe and the United States

This means newcleo is working not just on reactor design, but on building the skills and facilities needed to support production, testing, and commercial deployment. The company also has partnerships and projects in multiple countries, including France, Italy, Slovakia, and the U.S. These collaborations relate to licensing and siting work, research facilities, and future commercial reactor projects.

Closing the Nuclear Fuel Loop

Nuclear power is often seen as a low-carbon energy source because it produces virtually no direct CO₂ emissions during operation. However, it leaves behind radioactive waste that can remain hazardous for thousands of years.

nuclear carbon emission
Carbon Footprint of Various Energy Sources

Traditional reactors use uranium fuel once and store the resulting waste. newcleo’s approach aims to reuse existing waste as reactor fuel. This could potentially reduce the volume and hazard of waste that needs long-term storage.

Lead-cooled fast reactors are one class of Generation IV nuclear technology. These designs are intended to be safer and more efficient than older reactors. They can run on fuels that traditional reactors cannot and may help make nuclear energy more sustainable in the long term.

Using recycled radioactive fuel helps close the nuclear fuel cycle. This means sourcing more energy from mined uranium, which leaves less waste behind.

Building a Cross-Border Nuclear Footprint

newcleo has stated that it plans to roll out its technology in several countries with active regulatory frameworks for advanced nuclear projects. The company has started licensing and planning partnerships in Europe and the U.S. These moves aim to make it a major supplier of advanced nuclear power systems.

In France, newcleo is preparing regulatory filings for both fuel and reactor projects. In Italy, it is building R&D infrastructure and test systems, while in Slovakia, it has formed a joint venture to deploy multiple reactors at a nuclear site. And in the U.S., it is engaging in collaborations to build fuel manufacturing and fabrication capabilities.

The company’s CEO, Stefano Buono, said investors view newcleo’s progress in licensing, R&D, and global expansion as a key advantage. He further added,

“Our ability to deliver impactful low-carbon energy solutions for energy-intensive firms is proving an attractive investment rationale for both industrial and financial investors. Our tangible progress in licensing, R&D, vertical integration, and geographic expansion is seen by investors as a key differentiator in the race to deliver clean, safe, and affordable nuclear energy.”

Small Modular Reactors Gain Global Traction

Interest in small modular reactors is rising as countries look for reliable, low-carbon power. Governments and industry groups also track SMRs more closely than before.

One sign is the growing number of designs in development. The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) reported that its latest SMR Dashboard found 98 SMR technologies globally. It detailed 56 of these SMRs in its dashboard set.

A separate NEA summary shows a larger count of designs tracked over editions. This highlights how quickly the pipeline is expanding.

  • Forecasts also show wider deployment in the coming decades. The International Energy Agency (IEA) publishes scenario data on global SMR capacity from 2025 to 2050.

In its analysis, SMR capacity rises from near-zero today to tens of gigawatts by 2050 in its main scenarios (39 GW), and it grows even higher in its “high SMR” case (190 GW). This suggests that SMRs could move from pilot projects to meaningful scale if costs fall and licensing speeds up.

SMR Global Installed Capacity by Scenario and Case, 2025-2050 IEA data
Data from the IEA; STEPS = Stated Policies Scenario; APS = Announced Pledges Scenario; NZE = Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario.

International institutions also expect nuclear growth overall, with SMRs playing a bigger role. In September 2025, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said it raised its long-term nuclear outlook again.

In its best-case scenario, the IAEA predicts that global nuclear capacity could grow to 2.6 times the 2024 level by 2050. It also noted that SMRs will be key to this growth.

Policy signals further support this direction. The NEA reports that over 20 countries at COP28 pledged to triple global nuclear energy capacity by 2050.

These forecasts do not guarantee fast deployment. SMRs still face key hurdles such as licensing timelines, supply chains, fuel availability, and first-of-a-kind costs. 

SMRs are increasingly central to global nuclear talks. The NEA tracks more designs, and the IEA outlines new deployment pathways. And interest from investors and policymakers has grown as countries look for reliable low-carbon baseload power.

The €75 million funding round adds to newcleo’s growing capital base. It boosts the company’s ability to advance its technology and work toward deployment. As of early 2026, newcleo has raised more than $124 million over the past year, with total funding since 2021 likely exceeding €645 million.

Private Capital Signals a Nuclear Comeback

The investment in newcleo highlights a broader trend: private capital is moving into advanced nuclear technologies.

Investors in heavy industry and finance are now seeing nuclear power as key to global decarbonization efforts. Some countries have recently updated their policies. This supports nuclear research and licensing. It shows a focus on energy security and climate goals.

Lead-cooled fast reactors and similar designs remain in early stages of testing and regulatory review. Newcleo and similar companies think their technologies can provide clean, reliable power. They also believe these systems create less waste over their life cycles compared to older reactors.

If successful, this approach could expand the role of nuclear power in the energy transition. But much work remains in testing, licensing, manufacturing, and cost reduction before commercial deployment at scale.