India’s Carbon Market Portal Goes Live as Carbon Credit Trading Nears

Saptakee S

-

March 24, 2026

India’s Carbon Market Portal Goes Live as Carbon Credit Trading Nears

India has taken a major step toward building a working carbon market. The government has launched the Indian Carbon Market Portal, a central digital platform that will support the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme, or CCTS. With this move, India is no longer just designing its carbon market on paper. It is now putting the system into action.

The portal was launched at the International Conference on Carbon Markets, Prakriti 2026, held in New Delhi. Union Power Minister Manohar Lal said formal trading in carbon credit certificates is expected to begin within four months. That timeline makes the launch especially important. It shows that India is moving quickly from policy design to actual market operations.

The new portal will become the main platform for registration, monitoring, reporting, and verification of emissions. In simple terms, it will handle the back-end system needed to run a national carbon market. Companies that want to participate will need to register through the portal before they can trade carbon credits.

From Act to Action: India’s Carbon Market Story

2022: Laying the Foundation

India did not build this market overnight. The foundation was laid in 2022, when Parliament passed amendments to the Energy Conservation Act, 2001. These changes gave the government the legal power to create a carbon market and issue carbon credit certificates. That amendment was the first major sign that India wanted a structured, national system for carbon trading.

2023: Introducing the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS)

After that, policymakers worked on the framework needed to turn the idea into reality. In 2023, the government formally introduced the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme. The CCTS created the core structure of the Indian Carbon Market and defined the roles of the institutions that would run it. It also set up the National Steering Committee for the Indian Carbon Market to oversee the framework.

This step mattered because carbon markets need strong governance to work properly. Without clear rules, trusted oversight, and proper measurement systems, trading can lose credibility. India’s approach has been to first build the rules and institutions and then move toward implementation.

2024: Detailed Rules for Compliance Mechanism

In 2024, the government added more detail by adopting regulations for the compliance mechanism under the CCTS. This mechanism follows an intensity-based baseline-and-credit system. That means companies are measured by the amount of greenhouse gas they emit compared with their production output, not simply by total emissions alone.

Why the Portal Matters for Companies, Offsets, and Climate Goals

This structure fits India’s economy well. The country is still growing fast, and many industries are expanding. So instead of placing a fixed cap on total emissions right away, the system rewards firms that improve carbon efficiency. If a company performs better than its assigned greenhouse gas emission intensity target, it earns carbon credit certificates. If it falls short, it must buy credits from others.

That approach gives the industry some breathing room while still pushing it toward cleaner operations. It also sends a clear financial signal. The lower a company’s emissions intensity, the better its chance of earning value from the market. Over time, this can encourage investments in cleaner fuels, better equipment, energy efficiency, and modern industrial processes.

The compliance market will first cover large industrial units in energy-intensive sectors. These are the industries where emissions are high and where efficiency gains can make a real difference. By focusing first on major emitters, India is trying to create a market that targets the most important sources of industrial emissions.

The Digital Backbone of India’s Carbon Market

The Indian Carbon Market Portal is important because it brings all parts of the system together in one place. The Bureau of Energy Efficiency, or BEE, will oversee the portal and the wider market. Through the platform, authorities will assess emissions data, track compliance obligations, and manage the issue and trade of surplus certificates.

That means the portal is not just a registration website. It is the digital backbone of the whole market. It supports the monitoring, reporting, and verification process, often called MRV. This part is critical because carbon markets only work when emissions data is accurate, transparent, and trusted. If the numbers are weak, the market cannot function properly. So the portal plays a central role in building credibility.

Voluntary Carbon Credits Expand India’s Market Reach

Along with the compliance market, India is also developing a voluntary offset market under the CCTS. This part of the system is open to a wider group of projects and participants. It allows eligible climate projects to generate carbon credits that can be traded.

This is an important feature because it expands the market beyond large industrial companies. It gives project developers, clean energy players, and other climate-focused businesses a chance to participate. In turn, that can help bring more investment into low-carbon activities across the economy.

The government has already approved several methodologies for voluntary carbon credit generation. These methodologies set the rules for how emissions reductions are measured and verified. They are essential because credits have value only when buyers trust that the reductions are real.

On March 28, 2025, India’s Ministry of Power approved 8 crediting methodologies for generating voluntary carbon credits, including:

Renewable Energy
Green Hydrogen Production
Industrial Energy Efficiency
Mangrove Afforestation and Reforestation

Supporting India’s Net Zero Goal

India’s carbon market also supports the country’s wider climate commitments. India has pledged to reduce the emissions intensity of its economy by 45% from 2005 levels by 2030. It has also committed to reaching net zero by 2070. A carbon market can help support both goals by encouraging industries to reduce emissions flexibly and cost-effectively.

india carbon emissions — Source: NITI Aayog

At the same time, the market may help Indian companies deal with external carbon rules such as the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, or CBAM. As global trade becomes more carbon-conscious, Indian exporters may need stronger emissions data and proof of climate compliance. A domestic carbon market can help improve both.

The launch also fits into a bigger policy trend. India has recently placed more attention on industrial decarbonization, including support for carbon capture, utilisation, and storage in hard-to-abate sectors. This shows that the government is not relying on one solution alone. Instead, it is building a broader climate strategy that combines regulation, technology, finance, and market incentives.

In conclusion, India’s move comes at a time when climate regulation is becoming more important not only at home but also in global trade. A strong domestic carbon market can help Indian industries improve emissions tracking, manage compliance, and prepare for international carbon pricing systems. That gives the portal a much bigger role than just administration. It could become a key tool in India’s low-carbon growth story.

Google Turns Data Centers Into Grid Assets With 1 GW Flex Power Deal

Jennifer L

-

March 24, 2026

0

Google Turns Data Centers Into Grid Assets With 1 GW Flex Power Deal

Google has taken a major step in reshaping how large energy users interact with the power grid. The company has secured 1 gigawatt (GW) of demand response capacity across its U.S. data center operations with several utility partners. This allows Google to cut or shift electricity use during high demand. It helps stabilize the grid and reduce system costs.

The scale is significant. One gigawatt is roughly enough to power about 750,000 U.S. homes for a year. Demand response helps reduce peak power needs, which can cut grid strain during extreme heat or cold. It also reduces the need for expensive “peaker” plants that run only a few hours per year.

The company noted:

“Demand response enables our data centers to be valuable assets for the power grid. Our ability to shift or reduce our energy demand can help utility companies balance supply and demand and plan for future capacity needs. These agreements create a smart solution to make the electricity systems that serve our data centers more affordable and reliable.”

Demand Response: Turning Data Centers into Flexible Grid Assets

Google’s move reflects a growing challenge. U.S. electricity demand is rising fast. Data centers, especially those running artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud computing, are among the fastest‑growing power loads.

At the same time, building new power supply and grid infrastructure can take five to ten years or more. Google’s strategy bridges this gap by making demand more flexible instead of only increasing supply.

Demand response is a system where large electricity users reduce or shift power use during peak periods. Instead of running at full capacity all the time, facilities adjust operations based on grid conditions. This helps balance supply and demand in real time.

Google applies this by managing its data center workloads. It can delay or shift energy‑intensive tasks, especially machine learning and batch computing, to times when electricity demand is lower. This reduces energy use during peak grid stress without affecting performance.

It also turns data centers into flexible energy assets rather than fixed loads. Traditionally, grids treat demand as constant. Google’s model changes that assumption.

The company has built this system through agreements with multiple U.S. utilities, including:

Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)
Indiana Michigan Power
Entergy Arkansas
Minnesota Power
DTE Energy

These partnerships let grid operators ask Google to cut demand during stressful times, like heat waves or winter peaks. This helps keep the system reliable without just depending on backup generation.

Why Peak Demand Matters for Costs and Reliability

The timing of this move is critical. The U.S. Department of Energy projects that electricity demand could grow 20% or more by 2030, driven by electrification and digital services.

Data centers are a major part of this growth. With AI workloads increasing rapidly, total data center energy use rose over 20% between 2020 and 2025 in the U.S., according to industry studies.

At the same time, grid expansion faces delays. Building new transmission lines or power plants can take years or even decades due to permitting, siting, and cost challenges. Demand response offers a faster solution that can be deployed now.

Google notes that flexible demand can help utilities:

Balance supply and demand in real time,
Avoid building rarely used “peaker” plants,
Reduce stress on transmission systems, and
Lower wholesale electricity prices during peaks.

Even small flexibility gains can have large system‑wide effects. Research from the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) suggests that demand response programs could reduce peak load by 10–20% in many regions, leading to significant savings in infrastructure costs.

This is because peak demand drives infrastructure spending. Power systems are often built to meet only a few hours of extreme demand each year. Reducing those peaks can delay or avoid costly investments in generation and transmission.

Cost Savings and Reliability Gains

Google’s demand response strategy targets two key outcomes: lower costs and improved reliability.

First, cost reduction. Peak demand periods often coincide with the highest wholesale electricity prices. By lowering demand during those hours, both Google and utilities can save money. These savings can help stabilize electricity prices for businesses and households alike.
Second, reliability. Power grids face increasing pressure from extreme weather, electrification of transport and buildings, and higher loads from digital infrastructure. Demand response adds flexibility that helps prevent outages when supply is tight.

Google’s system allows it to cut the load quickly when needed. This gives grid operators more tools during tight supply conditions. It also reduces the risk of blackouts and emergency calls for conservation.

Importantly, this approach does not reduce overall energy use over time. Instead, it shifts when energy is used. This makes the system more efficient without limiting long‑term growth in data center activity or other demand.

SEE MORE:

A Shift in Energy Strategy for Big Tech

Google’s move reflects a broader shift across the technology sector. Large tech companies are no longer just energy consumers. They are becoming active participants in energy systems.

This change is driven by several trends:

Rapid growth in AI workloads that require large computing resources;
Rising energy costs that pressure operating margins;
Corporate climate targets tied to investor and public expectations; and
Pressure to secure a reliable power supply amid grid uncertainty.

Demand response is now joining renewable energy procurement as a core strategy. Google has already invested heavily in solar, wind, geothermal, and energy storage. The company regularly ranks among the top corporate buyers of renewable energy, which helps avoid emissions.

Google clean energy emission reductions — Source: Google

Other industries have used demand response for years, including manufacturing and heavy industry. However, its use in data centers is still new. The scale of Google’s 1 GW deployment signals that this model could expand quickly and be adopted by other large energy users.

Linking Demand Response to Google’s 24/7 Carbon-Free Goals

Google’s demand response move also supports its wider clean energy and climate strategy. The company aims to run on 24/7 carbon‑free energy by 2030 and reach net‑zero emissions across its operations and value chain by 2030.

Progress is ongoing. In 2024, Google matched about 66% of its electricity use with carbon‑free energy on an hourly basis, even as power demand rose due to a 27% increase in workload from AI and cloud services.

google data center emissions — Source: Google

At the same time, Google added 2.5 GW of new clean energy capacity to the grids serving its operations and cut data center energy emissions by 12% compared with baseline years.

Demand response helps close the remaining gap. By shifting when electricity is used, Google can better match operations with clean energy supply. This improves its ability to run on carbon‑free power every hour of the day.

The Future of Demand Response in AI and Cloud Operations

The demand response market is expected to grow as grids become more complex. Several trends support this outlook.

Rising demand: U.S. data center growth will drive much of the new electricity use over the next decade. Digital services continue to push the load higher.
Renewables growth: Wind and solar are cheap but variable, making flexible demand more important for grid stability.
Grid limits: U.S. interconnection queues include thousands of gigawatts of projects, far more than the grid can handle quickly, causing delays.

Demand response can help manage these constraints. It acts as a “virtual power plant” by reducing demand instead of increasing supply. Studies suggest that flexible demand could unlock large amounts of additional grid capacity and reduce the need for costly transmission upgrades.

This makes demand response one of the fastest and most cost‑effective tools available for grid management.

A Cost-Effective Tool for Modern Grids

As electricity demand continues to grow, this energy model may become more common. Utilities, regulators, and companies are already exploring ways to expand demand‑side flexibility.

In the coming years, the success of these programs will depend on technology, policy support, and market design. However, the direction is clear. Flexible demand is becoming a core part of modern energy systems. Google’s latest move provides a real‑world example of how this transition can work at scale.

READ MORE: Google Inks Waste-to-Carbon Deal to Remove 200K Tons of CO₂ With AI and Biochar

Is Tesla Building a 100 GW U.S. Solar Giant With Chinese Equipment?

Saptakee S

-

March 24, 2026

0

Is Tesla Building a 100 GW U.S. Solar Giant With Chinese Equipment?

Tesla may be getting ready for one of the biggest solar manufacturing moves in America. Reuters reports that the company is looking at buying about $2.9 billion worth of equipment from Chinese suppliers to make solar cells and solar panels in the United States.

If the plan moves forward, it could help Tesla build up to 100 gigawatts of solar manufacturing capacity on American soil by the end of 2028. That is a huge number. It also shows how serious Elon Musk may be about turning solar into a much bigger part of Tesla’s future.

But the report also reveals a bigger problem for the U.S. clean energy sector. Even when companies want to manufacture in America, they still often depend on Chinese tools, machinery, and supply chains to make it happen.

Tesla’s Solar Dream Is Getting Bigger

According to Reuters, Tesla is in talks with several Chinese companies that make solar manufacturing equipment. Suzhou Maxwell Technologies is one of the main names in the discussion. The company is known as the world’s biggest maker of screen-printing equipment used in solar cell production.

Other possible suppliers include Shenzhen S.C New Energy Technology and Laplace Renewable Energy Technology, Reuters said, citing people familiar with the matter.

Some of the equipment may need export approval from China’s commerce ministry before it can be shipped. Reuters reported that the companies were asked to deliver the machinery before autumn, and two sources said the equipment would likely head to Texas.

These details suggest Tesla’s plan is not just an idea or a long-term goal. The company seems to be preparing for a major manufacturing buildout in the U.S. However, the company has not publicly confirmed the reported order. The Chinese suppliers and China’s commerce ministry also did not respond to Reuters’ requests for comment, according to the report.

In January, Musk said solar power could meet all of America’s electricity needs, including rising demand from data centers. Reuters also noted that Tesla job postings said the company wants to deploy 100 GW of “solar manufacturing from raw materials on American soil before the end of 2028.”

The Cost Gap Keeps China in Charge of Solar Supply Chains

After years of heavy investment, China controls most of the world’s solar manufacturing chain. According to Wood Mackenzie, China is expected to hold more than 80% of global polysilicon, wafer, cell, and module manufacturing capacity from 2023 to 2026.

Wood Mac also said a solar module made in China is about 50% cheaper than one made in Europe and 65% cheaper than one made in the United States. That price gap makes it hard for U.S. factories to compete, especially in the early stages.

So even when U.S. companies want to build locally, they still often need Chinese equipment and expertise. Reuters pointed out that the Biden administration excluded solar manufacturing equipment from tariffs in 2024 after U.S. solar companies said they had no real alternative source for the machines needed to launch domestic factories. That exemption has since been extended by the Trump administration.

In other words, America’s solar manufacturing push still depends, at least in part, on Chinese technology.

READ MORE: Two Solar Stories, Two Different Directions: Why China Builds Faster as the U.S. Hits Pause

Why Tesla May Be Making This Move Now

Tesla’s reported plan is about much more than one company. It highlights a major challenge for the United States as it tries to build a stronger clean energy economy.

U.S. electricity demand is rising again, and solar is growing fast. The Energy Information Administration said U.S. power use hit its second straight record high in 2025. It also expects demand to keep rising in 2026 and 2027.

At the same time, solar is becoming one of the country’s fastest-growing power sources. In its latest outlook, the EIA said utility-scale solar generation in the U.S. is expected to grow from 290 billion kilowatt-hours in 2025 to 424 billion kilowatt-hours by 2027.

The EIA also said nearly 70 GW of new solar capacity is scheduled to come online in 2026 and 2027. That would increase U.S. solar operating capacity by 49% compared with the end of 2025.

Texas Solar Capacity Supports Tesla and SpaceX

Texas is expected to lead much of that growth. Solar generation in the ERCOT grid is forecast to rise from 56 billion kilowatt-hours in 2025 to 106 billion kilowatt-hours by 2027. Battery storage is also growing to help balance solar power throughout the day.

This helps explain why Texas is such an important part of Tesla’s reported plan. The state already plays a big role in Tesla’s manufacturing footprint. It is also one of the hottest solar markets in the country.

For Tesla, building solar equipment or solar products in Texas could support more than just the grid. Reuters said Musk plans to use much of the capacity for Tesla itself, while some could also help power SpaceX satellites.

That would turn solar into a strategic asset across Musk’s wider business empire. It would also tie clean power more closely to Tesla’s long-term growth story, especially as energy demand from artificial intelligence and data infrastructure keeps rising across the country.

Snapshot of US Solar Imports

Even with more local manufacturing, the U.S. solar market still depends heavily on imported parts. Solar Power World reviewed U.S. International Trade Commission data and found that the United States imported 33 GW of silicon solar panels in 2025. It also imported 21 GW of silicon solar cells.

That cell figure is especially important because it shows that U.S. panel assembly is growing faster than domestic cell production. America may be building more panels at home, but it still imports many of the core components needed to make them.

us solar panel import — Source: Chart: Solar Power WorldSource: U.S. ITCGet the dataCreated with Datawrapper

The report said the U.S. has around 50 GW of silicon panel assembly capacity, but less than 5 GW of domestic cell manufacturing output. That means plenty of cells still have to be imported. Notably, most imported cells came from Indonesia and Laos in 2025, while South Korea was also a major supplier.

This is where Tesla could make a difference. If it builds large-scale solar cell and panel manufacturing in the U.S., it could help close one of the biggest gaps in the domestic solar supply chain.

Still, there is an irony here. To reduce America’s dependence on foreign solar products, Tesla may first need to buy Chinese machines.

A Massive Opportunity, But Also a Huge Challenge

If the deal happens, it would be a major win for Chinese solar equipment companies. Many of them have faced weak domestic demand because China has already built too much manufacturing capacity.

For Tesla, the order could lay the foundation for a giant U.S. solar platform. It could support the company’s long-term energy strategy at a time when America needs more electricity, more solar, and more battery storage.

But the challenge is enormous.

Building 100 GW of solar manufacturing capacity in just a few years would be a staggering task. Tesla would need factories, workers, permits, raw materials, logistics, and smooth equipment delivery. It would also need stable trade rules and a supportive policy environment.

The company has already faced supply chain setbacks before. Reuters previously reported that production preparations for the Cybertruck and Semi in the U.S. were disrupted last year after component shipments from China were suspended following higher tariffs on Chinese goods. This history shows how exposed U.S. manufacturing can still be to trade tensions.

If speculations are true, Musk appears to be thinking far beyond electric vehicles, i.e., building a larger clean energy system around solar, batteries, manufacturing, and power demand from new technologies like AI.

For now, Reuters’ report shows a simple reality. The U.S. wants a homegrown solar industry. Tesla may want to help build one. But China still holds many of the tools needed to make that goal real.

ALSO SEE: The AI Energy War: How China’s Solar and Nuclear Outshine the U.S.

EU Plans Major Carbon Pricing Overhaul and €30B Clean Tech Boost to Drive Decarbonization

Jennifer L

-

March 24, 2026

0

EU Plans Major Carbon Pricing Overhaul and €30B Clean Tech Boost to Drive Decarbonization

The European Union is preparing to make large changes to its carbon pricing system. EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced that the bloc will revise its Emissions Trading System (ETS) and launch a new €30 billion cleantech investment fund. These moves aim to support the bloc’s climate goals and help industry cope with shifting energy markets.

The announcements came after a summit of EU leaders focused on energy prices and economic challenges. Rising global energy prices and geopolitical pressures are affecting Europe’s economy and industry.

The new proposals aim to improve the EU’s carbon pricing system. They will also encourage investment in clean technology throughout the bloc.

Von der Leyen said:

“The Emissions Trading System is working. It has massively reduced gas consumption. Because of that, it has reduced our dependency on imports of fossil fuels, and it has reduced our vulnerability. And it has driven major investments in the energy transition in the low-carbon energy sources like renewables and nuclear that are homegrown and give us independence. But we need to modernise it and make it more flexible.”

What Is the EU Emissions Trading System and Why Change It?

The EU’s Emissions Trading System is the bloc’s main carbon pricing tool. It was set up in 2005 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from major industrial sectors. These include electricity and heat generation, steel, cement, chemicals, and commercial aviation.

Under the ETS, companies must buy permits for each ton of carbon dioxide they emit. The total number of permits is capped to reduce emissions over time.

Over nearly two decades, the ETS has helped reduce Europe’s dependence on fossil fuels and encouraged investment in cleaner energy. It is often viewed as a cornerstone of the EU’s climate policy.

The EU ETS continues to generate large revenues that fund climate action across Europe. In 2025, total ETS auction revenues exceeded €43 billion, with about €24 billion going directly to EU member states.

The remaining funds were allocated to EU-level programs such as the Innovation Fund, Modernisation Fund, and the Social Climate Fund. Overall, ETS revenues since 2013 have surpassed €258 billion, making it one of the world’s largest carbon market funding sources.

However, rising energy costs are pressuring European industries. They started with the war in Ukraine and are now impacted by conflicts in the Middle East. Some member states have asked for a review of the ETS to ease short‑term burdens.

Planned changes “in the next days” may include:

Updating benchmarks for free allowances given to the industry.
Strengthening the Market Stability Reserve, which manages the supply of carbon allowances to stabilize prices.

Future changes will seek a “more realistic trajectory.” They may also extend free allocation for some industries past 2034.

Carbon Pricing in Europe: The Stakes and the Context

Carbon pricing has been a key driver of investment in clean energy. ETS prices influence how companies weigh fossil fuels versus low‑carbon options. In recent weeks, ETS prices have fluctuated, partly in response to talks about reform and broader energy market volatility.

Recent reports noted that benchmark EU carbon prices jumped almost 10% after policy statements from EU leadership.

Market stability is a core concern. The ETS’s design includes mechanisms to support consistent carbon prices, especially during times of economic stress. A strong and predictable carbon price can help investors commit to long‑term clean energy projects. Conversely, sudden changes can raise costs for industrial players and weaken investment incentives.

At the same time, formal industry and civil society groups have called for regulatory certainty. They say stable carbon pricing is key for planning big clean energy projects. It also helps the EU keep its role as a leader in global climate efforts. These groups emphasize that unpredictable policy shifts could slow clean industrial growth and raise risk for new projects.

RELATED: EU Carbon Market under Pressure: Business Lobby for Reform, Italy Calls for Suspension

A New €30 Billion Cleantech Fund to Boost Decarbonization

Alongside ETS reform, von der Leyen announced plans for a €30 billion ETS Investment Booster. This new fund will support decarbonization and clean technology projects across Europe. It will be financed by revenues from the ETS, meaning carbon pricing will help fund climate action directly.

The booster fund will operate on a “first-come, first-served” basis to support ready‑to‑deploy projects. Von der Leyen said that the fund will ensure access for lower‑income member states. This is intended to promote fairness across the EU and help balance regional disparities in clean technology investment.

The new fund complements existing EU climate finance mechanisms. The Innovation Fund has backed many projects. These include renewable energy, energy storage, and industrial decarbonization.

In 2024, the Innovation Fund provided €4.8 billion in grants. This supported 85 innovative net-zero projects. These efforts helped reduce nearly 476 million tonnes of CO₂ in the first decade.

Expanding funding sources for clean industrial investments reflects a broader EU trend. The Clean Industrial Deal, launched in 2025, plans to raise over €100 billion. This funding will support clean technology manufacturing, create jobs, boost energy efficiency, and promote circular economy solutions.

SEE MORE: EU Unlocks €5.2B for Clean-Tech Innovation: Hydrogen, Heat, and Net-Zero Projects

Renewables, Baseload, and Energy Market Trends in Europe

The EU’s net‑zero journey sits against a backdrop of changing energy markets. Renewable energy deployment in Europe continues to grow rapidly.

Wind and solar now make up an increasing share of electricity generation in many member states. These technologies are expected to gain further market share as costs fall and grid integration improves.

However, the need for stable and resilient power systems has grown. Renewable sources like wind and solar are variable by nature. This increases interest in baseload options like geothermal, hydropower, nuclear, and storage paired with renewables.

Meanwhile, global energy prices have remained volatile. Brent crude prices rose above $110 per barrel due to geopolitical tensions. This increase is driving up electricity and heating costs in Europe. These price swings can influence industrial competitiveness and household energy bills.

EU leaders view carbon pricing and investment in decarbonization as key to reducing long-term risks from unstable fossil fuel markets. Policymakers want to use ETS revenues for clean technologies. This will help reduce the need for imported fuels and boost energy independence.

Industry Reaction: Balancing Flexibility and Climate Signals

The proposed changes have drawn mixed reactions. Some industry groups welcomed the updates to the ETS. They said the funding support could help reduce short-term cost pressures. Others warn that too much flexibility could weaken long‑term climate signals and reduce investment certainty.

Civil society organizations have stressed the importance of maintaining carbon pricing integrity. They believe a strong, predictable ETS is key. It will boost investment in electrification, renewables, energy efficiency, and circular economy solutions. Maintaining the market’s rules‑based design, supporters say, will help the EU stay on track with its 2030 and 2040 climate targets.

The European Council has invited the Commission to present a formal ETS review by July 2026 at the latest. This timeline reflects the urgency of balancing climate goals with current economic pressures.

Looking Ahead: Combining Policy and Investment for Climate Goals

The EU’s planned changes mark an important step for climate policy. Reforming carbon pricing and launching a €30 billion cleantech fund will help drive decarbonization.

The ETS has already helped cut emissions by putting a cost on pollution and supporting cleaner energy. Using ETS revenues for clean technology will expand this impact. It will speed up renewable energy and support low-carbon industries.

These actions support the EU’s targets to reach climate neutrality by 2050 and cut emissions by at least 55% by 2030. The next phase of policy decisions will shape carbon markets, energy prices, and Europe’s clean energy transition.

READ MORE: EU Expands CBAM: A Review Shows It Urges Other Countries to Use Carbon Pricing

Lithium Prices Climb Again in 2026, Sending Stocks Upward

Jennifer L

-

March 23, 2026

0

Lithium Prices Climb Again in 2026, Sending Stocks Upward

Disseminated on behalf of Surge Battery Metals Inc.

The lithium market is experiencing a major rebound due to rising demand and tightening supply. Battery-grade lithium carbonate spot prices have jumped to about $24,086 per metric ton, based on data from Shanghai Metals Market (SMM). This marks a sharp increase from earlier lows in 2025, after a period of oversupply had weighed on the market.

What Causes Lithium Prices to Rebound

Several factors are behind the lithium price surge. First, the growth in stationary energy storage systems has been rapid. In 2025, demand for lithium in storage applications jumped about 71%, and analysts expect another 55% growth in 2026. As more utilities, data centers, and industrial players adopt battery storage, lithium demand continues to expand beyond just electric vehicles (EVs).

Second, China’s battery manufacturing sector is ramping up production to meet both domestic and global demand. Policy support for clean energy and EV adoption has helped absorb excess lithium that previously contributed to oversupply.

Meanwhile, regions like Europe and North America are boosting support for EVs and energy storage. European demand for batteries could reach 1 terawatt-hour by 2030. At the same time, U.S. incentives from the Inflation Reduction Act have already led to hundreds of new battery projects. These programs are driving additional lithium demand, putting further pressure on an already tight supply.

Third, supply constraints are becoming a concern. Forecasts for 2026 suggest a shift from surplus to a potential supply deficit of 22,000 to 80,000 metric tons, depending on how quickly new projects come online. This deficit is boosting hope among producers and investors. Prices might stay high if demand keeps outstripping supply.

Lithium’s Double Boost: AI + Data Center Batteries

Additional factors include rising interest in AI and data center batteries, which require large amounts of high-quality lithium. Emerging markets are generating new demand for battery-grade lithium. This adds to the existing need for electric vehicles. Coupled with a limited number of major lithium producers and delays in bringing new projects online, the market has become increasingly tight.

Other factors driving lithium prices up are the fast-growing need for batteries in AI data centers and energy storage systems. The global lithium-ion battery market for data centers was around $5.2 billion in 2024, per Prsedence Research. It is set to grow to nearly $17.7 billion by 2034, most of which will come from lithium batteries.

Lithium battery shipments for data center energy storage might rise over 80% in the next five years. Operators are expanding systems to support AI workloads that need steady power and load balancing. This surge in demand from new markets adds to the traditional battery needs of electric vehicles.

SEE MORE: The U.S. EV Supply Chain Race: Where Surge Battery Metals Fits in the National Critical Minerals Strategy

In short, the surge in lithium prices reflects a perfect storm of strong demand, constrained supply, and supportive policies. Investors and companies are taking note, as this environment signals higher revenues for producers. It also creates more opportunities for juniors to develop high-grade resources.

Surge Battery Metals Step Into the Spotlight

Surge Battery Metals (TSX-V: NILI | OTCQX: NILIF) is one such company advancing its position in the lithium supply chain. Surge focuses on the Nevada North Lithium Project (NNLP), which hosts the highest-grade lithium clay resource in the United States. It has a mineral resource estimate of 11.24 million tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) grading 3,010 ppm lithium at a 1,250 ppm cutoff.

The company has also seen strong investor interest. Its shares rose about 100% in 2025, reflecting renewed optimism around lithium exploration. The stock also surged roughly 30% in early January 2026, before experiencing some volatility later in the quarter.

This rally reflects the overall optimism in the lithium market. It also matches the strong gains of major producers like Albemarle. The increase shows growing confidence in NILI’s high-grade Nevada project and its potential role in meeting rising lithium demand.

In early January 2026, Surge announced a key executive hire to strengthen its commercial leadership. The company appointed Steffen Ball as Vice President of Commercial Development for Nevada North Lithium LLC, the joint venture between Surge and Evolution Mining. Mr. Ball brings senior experience from major automakers’ battery material sourcing teams, including roles at Nissan North America and Ford.

This appointment signals Surge’s focus on preparing the project for eventual production and strategic partnerships. It also shows the company’s plan to create a team with strong industry knowledge and connections in the lithium value chain.

Alongside personnel moves, Surge has attracted increased investment from institutional groups. The Quaternary Group, for example, increased its ownership in Surge by buying shares on the open market. Now, it holds about 7.8% of the company on an undiluted basis.

Nevada North: High-Grade, High Stakes

Surge Battery Metals stands out among junior lithium miners. Its main asset, the Nevada North Lithium Project, sits in a well-established U.S. mining region with strong infrastructure.

Early exploration shows lithium clay grades up to 7,630 ppm, with updated drill intercepts as high as 8,070 ppm, considered high for clay-based deposits. A Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) shows an after-tax NPV of US$9.2 billion. It also has an IRR of 22.8% when lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) is priced at US$24,000 per tonne.

The project could produce an average of 86,300 tonnes of LCE annually, peaking at 109,100 tonnes in Year 6. Operating costs are estimated at US$5,243 per tonne of LCE, giving Surge a competitive edge.

The project is now progressing toward a Pre-Feasibility Study targeted for completion in late 2026, led by global engineering firm Fluor Corporation.

Surge is expanding its resource base through drilling across several kilometers of strike. The company recently reported additional strong drill results from Nevada North. It announced a 30.6-meter intercept grading 4,196 ppm lithium from surface in a 640-meter step-out hole to the southeast.

In infill drilling, Surge also reported 116 meters averaging 3,752 ppm lithium, including 32.1 meters grading 4,521 ppm near surface, highlighting a strong high-grade core within the deposit. These results confirm that high-grade lithium extends beyond the current resource area.

The wide step-out distance also shows strong potential for further expansion. Consistent high grades near the surface can support future resource growth and strengthen the project’s development outlook.

Moreover, Nevada’s mining-friendly environment, with access to roads, power, and skilled labor, reduces development risk. Strategic hires with experience in battery supply chains signal the company’s readiness to move toward production and partnerships.

High-grade resources, strong economics, and a strategic location put Surge in a great spot in the growing lithium market.

From Clay to Clean Energy

The recent rise in lithium prices shows how supply and demand dynamics are shifting. As energy storage and electric vehicles expand, major companies are boosting their market positions. Higher lithium prices support stronger revenue forecasts and have led analysts to raise price targets on key stocks.

At the same time, projects further upstream, including junior developers like Surge, are gaining strategic significance. Investments in early-stage lithium resources help diversify supply beyond dominant producers and geographies. Surge’s focus on commercial leadership and resource development reflects how smaller companies can play a role in meeting future demand.

If lithium prices keep rising and demand stays strong, both current producers and new developers could gain. For mining giants, this could mean the expansion of production capacity and stronger earnings. For Surge and similar companies, it could support project financing and advancement toward commercial output.

Lithium trading at $27.01.

Live Lithium Spot Price

Unit: USD/kg

---

Loading Chart...

READ MORE: Surge Battery Metals Strengthens Nevada North With High-Grade Expansion and Infill Success

DISCLAIMER

New Era Publishing Inc. and/or CarbonCredits.com (“We” or “Us”) are not securities dealers or brokers, investment advisers, or financial advisers, and you should not rely on the information herein as investment advice. Surge Battery Metals Inc. (“Company”) made a one-time payment of $75,000 to provide marketing services for a term of three months. None of the owners, members, directors, or employees of New Era Publishing Inc. and/or CarbonCredits.com currently hold, or have any beneficial ownership in, any shares, stocks, or options of the companies mentioned.

This article is informational only and is solely for use by prospective investors in determining whether to seek additional information. It does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Examples that we provide of share price increases pertaining to a particular issuer from one referenced date to another represent arbitrarily chosen time periods and are no indication whatsoever of future stock prices for that issuer and are of no predictive value.

Our stock profiles are intended to highlight certain companies for your further investigation; they are not stock recommendations or an offer or sale of the referenced securities. The securities issued by the companies we profile should be considered high-risk; if you do invest despite these warnings, you may lose your entire investment. Please do your own research before investing, including reviewing the companies’ SEDAR+ and SEC filings, press releases, and risk disclosures.

It is our policy that information contained in this profile was provided by the company, extracted from SEDAR+ and SEC filings, company websites, and other publicly available sources. We believe the sources and information are accurate and reliable but we cannot guarantee them.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT AND FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain statements contained in this news release may constitute “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking information generally can be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “plan,” and similar expressions suggesting future outcomes or events. Forward-looking information is based on current expectations of management; however, it is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated.

These factors include, without limitation, statements relating to the Company’s exploration and development plans, the potential of its mineral projects, financing activities, regulatory approvals, market conditions, and future objectives. Forward-looking information involves numerous risks and uncertainties and actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking information. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, market volatility, the state of financial markets for the Company’s securities, fluctuations in commodity prices, operational challenges, and changes in business plans.

Forward-looking information is based on several key expectations and assumptions, including, without limitation, that the Company will continue with its stated business objectives and will be able to raise additional capital as required. Although management of the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated, or intended.

There can be no assurance that such forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Additional information about risks and uncertainties is contained in the Company’s management’s discussion and analysis and annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2025, copies of which are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

The forward-looking information contained herein is expressly qualified in its entirety by this cautionary statement. Forward-looking information reflects management’s current beliefs and is based on information currently available to the Company. The forward-looking information is made as of the date of this news release, and the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise such information to reflect new events or circumstances except as may be required by applicable law.

Fervo Energy’s $421M Breakthrough and The Rise of Geothermal Power for Clean Electricity

Jennifer L

-

March 23, 2026

0

Fervo Energy’s $421M Breakthrough and The Rise of Geothermal Power for Clean Electricity

A major new investment is bringing geothermal energy back into focus. Fervo Energy has secured $421 million to build and expand its Cape Station geothermal project in Utah. The deal marks one of the largest recent financings in the U.S. geothermal sector.

This move comes at a time when energy systems are changing fast. Demand for reliable, carbon-free power is rising. Solar and wind are growing quickly, but they depend on the weather. Geothermal offers a different advantage. It provides steady electricity, day and night.

Fervo’s project shows how this technology is starting to scale. It also highlights a broader shift in clean energy markets. David Ulrey, Chief Financial Officer at Fervo Energy, said:

“Non-recourse financing has historically been considered out of reach for first-of-a-kind projects. Cape Station disrupts that narrative. With proven oil and gas technology paired with AI-enabled drilling and exploration, robust commercial offtake, operational consistency, and an unrelenting focus on health and safety, we have shown that EGS [enhanced geothermal systems] is a highly bankable asset class.”

A Major Investment in Next-Generation Geothermal

Fervo’s $421 million financing includes a mix of debt and credit support. The package is designed to fund the construction and early operations of the Cape Station project.

RBC Capital Markets is the coordinating lead arranger, working with Barclays, BBVA, and HSBC, with additional support from J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, and Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank’s New York branch.

Sean Pollock, Managing Director at RBC Capital Markets, remarked:

“As demand for firm, clean, affordable power accelerates, EGS is set to become a core energy asset class for infrastructure lenders. Fervo is pioneering this step change with Cape Station, a vital contribution to American energy security that RBC is proud to support.”

The project is located in Utah and is expected to become one of the largest EGS in the United States. Its initial phases could reach hundreds of megawatts of capacity, with long-term plans to scale up to 2 gigawatts (GW).

Conventional and EGS in the U.S.

conventional and EGS geothermal in US.jpg — Source: EIA

This is a significant size. A 1 GW power plant can supply electricity to hundreds of thousands of homes, depending on usage levels. At full build-out, Cape Station could rank among the largest clean energy facilities in the country.

Fervo’s approach uses advanced drilling methods adapted from the oil and gas sector. These techniques allow developers to access deep heat resources that were once too difficult to reach. This expands the potential for geothermal energy beyond traditional locations.

SEE MORE: Fervo Energy Secures $206 Million for U.S. Geothermal Ambitions

From Niche to Necessary: Geothermal’s Small Share but Large Potential

The United States currently has about 2.7 gigawatts (GW) of conventional geothermal capacity, per the US Energy Information Administration. This is only 0.2% of total U.S. summer generating capacity, which refers to the maximum power available during peak demand in summer.

geothermal resources in USA.jpg — Source: EIA

The potential for EGS is much larger. The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that 135 GW of power could be developed from EGS in the Great Basin alone.

Other estimates suggest that up to 150 GW of cost-effective geothermal capacity could be built in the coming decades, depending on market conditions and technological progress.

geothermal power market potential 2050 by region — Source: IEA

In 2023, the National Laboratory of the Rockies estimated that about 90 GW of EGS capacity could be economically developed across the United States by 2050.

The small share reflects past limitations. Traditional geothermal projects require natural underground reservoirs of hot water or steam. These are only found in certain regions.

Technology Is Unlocking New Geothermal Resources

However, new technologies are changing that. Enhanced geothermal systems can create artificial reservoirs by injecting water into hot rock formations. This makes geothermal viable in many more areas.

The key to geothermal growth lies in innovation. Traditional geothermal systems are limited by geography. Enhanced systems aim to remove that constraint.

Fervo uses horizontal drilling and hydraulic stimulation. These methods are similar to those used in shale oil and gas production. They allow wells to reach deeper and hotter rock formations.

The company has already tested this approach. Its pilot project, known as Project Red, produced about 3.5 megawatts (MW) of continuous electricity. It also showed strong flow rates, which are critical for long-term performance.

Scaling up from pilot to commercial size is the next step. Cape Station represents that transition. If successful, it could prove that enhanced geothermal systems can operate on a large scale. This would open the door for wider adoption across the United States and other countries.

Why 24/7 Clean Energy Is in High Demand

Electricity demand is rising across the United States and globally. This is driven by electrification, population growth, and new industries.

At the same time, the energy system is shifting toward renewables. Solar and wind are now among the fastest-growing sources of electricity. However, these sources are variable. Solar only produces power during the day. Wind output can change with weather conditions.

This creates a need for stable energy sources that can run at all times. Geothermal meets this need. It provides baseload power, meaning it can operate continuously without interruption.

Other low-carbon baseload options include nuclear and hydropower. Geothermal adds another layer to this group, especially in regions where other options are limited.

As renewable energy expands, the value of steady power is increasing. This trend is driving interest in geothermal projects.

Investment Trends Support Geothermal Growth

Fervo’s funding reflects a broader shift in energy investment. Clean energy technologies are attracting increasing amounts of capital.

The company has raised about $1.5 billion in total funding since its founding in 2017. This includes equity investments and project-level financing.

Government policy is also playing a role. The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act provides tax credits and incentives for clean energy projects, including geothermal. These incentives help reduce project costs and improve returns for investors.

At the same time, utilities and large energy users are seeking long-term clean power contracts. This creates stable revenue streams for projects like Cape Station.

Cumulative investment for next-generation geothermal, 2025-2050 — Source: IEA

Global energy investment trends show continued growth in renewables, including geothermal. The International Energy Agency reports that clean energy investment is expected to exceed $2 trillion annually in the coming years, with solar leading but other technologies gaining support.

Geothermal is still a small part of this total today. However, its role could expand as the need for reliable clean energy increases, reaching nearly $3 trillion by 2050.

A New Role for Geothermal in the Energy Transition

Fervo’s $421 million project highlights a shift in how energy systems are evolving. The focus is no longer only on adding renewable capacity. It is also about building a stable and balanced grid.

Geothermal can help fill gaps left by solar and wind. It provides continuous, carbon-free electricity that supports grid reliability. This makes it useful for a range of applications, including:

Powering cities and industrial operations.
Supporting renewable-heavy grids.
Reducing dependence on fossil fuel backup.

If enhanced geothermal systems continue to scale, they could become a key part of the clean energy mix. Fervo’s project is still in its early stages, but it represents a broader trend. Energy markets are starting to value not just clean power, but also consistent power.

As this shift continues, geothermal may move from a niche resource to a core component of the energy transition.

READ MORE: Google Taps Earth’s Heat in 150MW Geothermal Deal with Ormat Technologies to Power Data Centers

Toyota Locks in One of the Biggest Solar Power Deals in North America

Jennifer L

-

March 23, 2026

0

Toyota Locks in One of the Biggest Solar Power Deals in North America

Toyota has secured a major new source of solar power in Texas, marking a big step in corporate clean energy buying. The company signed a long‑term deal with U.S.-based clean energy group Avantus that gives it the full output from a large solar farm. This move adds significant renewable energy to Toyota’s portfolio and reflects wider shifts in the global energy market.

The solar project, known as the Norton Solar Project, is now operational. It sits in Runnels County, in central Texas. The plant can generate 159 megawatts of direct current (MWdc) and 125 megawatts of alternating current (MWac) once connected to the grid. This renewable energy can power tens of thousands of homes.

A Big Step for Corporate Clean Power Buying

Toyota structured the deal through a type of contract called a virtual power purchase agreement (VPPA). Under this arrangement, the carmaker does not take physical power from the site.

Instead, it buys all of the solar farm’s output on paper and uses that to match its electricity use. This allows the company to claim the renewable energy for its operations while the electricity flows into the local power grid.

This deal continues Toyota’s broader strategy to increase its clean energy use while responding to market trends and energy policy changes in the United States.

The automaker’s new power agreement is notable in several ways. A 159 MWdc solar plant is not small. It is larger than many utility‑scale solar projects in the United States. For comparison, the Roserock Solar Facility in Pecos County is about 212 MWac and was one of Texas’s biggest a few years ago.

Texas: A Growing Hub for Clean Power

Utility‑scale solar has grown rapidly in Texas. The state now leads the U.S. in solar generation capacity, and its total solar installations recently surpassed those of California, reaching nearly 21.9 gigawatts (GW) by mid‑2025. Another 12 GW was under construction at that time — more than the next five states combined.

texas utility-scale solar — Source: Inside Climate News

Texas is a special case within the U.S. energy landscape. It has long been a leader in electricity generation due to its large market and competitive regulatory environment.

Wind power has dominated in recent years, making the state the top wind generator nationwide. Solar has now joined that trend, growing rapidly due to favorable land, high solar irradiance, and strong developer interest.

This rapid growth reflects both cost trends and market demand. Solar panel prices have dropped a lot in the last ten years. Also, utility-scale projects are now cheaper and quicker to build.

Large energy buyers, like corporations, are signing long-term clean power contracts. They do this to meet environmental goals and secure stable energy costs.

Toyota’s VPPA is one example. Others include Lightsource bp’s 15‑year solar deal with Toyota for 231 MW at the Jones City 2 solar farm, signed earlier in 2026. These agreements help companies lock in clean power without owning generation assets directly.

What the Norton Solar Project Means in Numbers

Avantus is a U.S.-based clean energy developer focused on large-scale solar and battery storage projects. The company has a pipeline of about 24 gigawatts (GW) of solar and 75 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of storage across the western United States. It developed the Norton Solar Project and supplies renewable power to utilities and major corporate buyers like Toyota through long-term agreements.

The Norton Solar Project reached operational status by early 2026 after construction began in mid‑2024. During peak construction, the project supported around 250 jobs in Runnels County.

Once fully online, the plant will supply a large volume of clean electricity to the grid. Based on typical capacity factors for utility solar in Texas, a facility like this could generate hundreds of gigawatt‑hours (GWh) per year. That amount can power roughly 25,000–30,000 average Texas homes annually — pointing to its scale in practical terms.

Utility‑scale solar in Texas now contributes to a state power mix that also includes wind and battery storage. Solar’s share of the grid is growing, especially during daylight hours when peak power demand is high. This growth supports broader decarbonization efforts and reduces reliance on fossil fuels.

RELATED: TotalEnergies and Google’s 1 GW Solar Deal Signals a New Phase in the Data Center Energy Race

Projects of this scale also bring ongoing local economic benefits. Beyond construction jobs, they also generate property taxes and land lease payments for rural counties. This provides steady revenue to support schools, roads, and other public services.

From Solar to EVs: Toyota’s Bigger Climate Strategy

Toyota’s Texas solar deal fits into a wider climate strategy that focuses on cutting emissions across its operations and product lineup. The company aims to achieve carbon neutrality in its global operations by 2035 and across its vehicles by 2050. Securing renewable power through projects like the Norton Solar Project is a key step toward those goals.

Toyota carbon neutrality net zero 2050 goal — Source: Toyota

The carmaker tracks greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through its Environmental Challenge 2050 and North American sustainability plans. The company plans to cut GHG emissions by 30% by 2030, using 2019 levels as a baseline. It also aims for a 33.3% drop in average emissions from new vehicles by 2030 and over 50% by 2035 compared to 2019.

Toyota plans to cut Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 68% from 2019 levels. Also, they seek to boost renewable electricity use at their facilities. In North America, Scope 1 and 2 emissions have already dropped about 32% since 2019.

Toyota Environmental Challenge 2050 — Source: Toyota

Solar energy is now central to its decarbonization approach. As costs continue to fall, renewable power has become one of the most practical ways for large manufacturers to reduce emissions from electricity use.

At the same time, Toyota is expanding its electrification strategy. This includes battery electric vehicles, hybrids, and other low-emission technologies. Clean electricity is critical to this shift, especially as EV production and charging demand grow.

toyota Vehicle electrification milestones — Source: Toyota

In this context, utility-scale solar projects like the one in Texas do more than supply power. They help align Toyota’s energy use with its long-term climate targets, showing how renewable energy is becoming a core part of industrial decarbonization.

Corporate Clean Energy Buying Hits New Highs

Many global companies have set internal goals for clean energy use. Toyota is no exception. The automaker has broad sustainability targets under its long‑term environmental plans, including increasing renewable energy procurement across its operations worldwide.

Solar and wind power are now among the cheapest sources of new electricity in most major markets. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) consistently projects that solar and wind will remain cost‑competitive with fossil fuels through the 2030s and beyond.

The Solar Energy Industries Association projects that 70% of planned grid additions through 2030 will come from solar or storage.

solar energy fact sheet US data SEIA — Source: SEIA

This outlook encourages large buyers to lock in long‑term renewable contracts to stabilize energy costs. Independent power purchase agreements allow them to hedge against future price swings.

Looking Ahead: Renewables, EVs, and Decarbonization

For companies with large electricity footprints, the economics are compelling. Renewable energy contracts tied to solar generation often provide predictable costs over many years. They can also generate renewable energy certificates (RECs), which are used to validate claims of clean energy use.

RECs represent the environmental benefits of generating electricity from renewable sources like solar or wind. One REC equals one megawatt-hour (MWh) of clean electricity produced and delivered to the grid.

Companies buy RECs to match their electricity use with renewable energy, even if they do not use that power directly. RECs are widely used in corporate sustainability strategies, but they do not always reflect physical changes in local power supply.

A virtual PPA, as the one Toyota signed, lets a company match its energy use with renewable generation without transporting electricity directly. This flexibility is especially useful in deregulated markets like the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) region, where buyers can contract with independent generators.

Large automakers like Toyota are also investing in electrification, including battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and related technologies. Renewable energy procurement supports these shifts and helps decarbonize operations from manufacturing to corporate offices.

Toyota’s new Texas solar agreement reflects broader energy market trends. Solar power is no longer a niche energy source. It is a core part of both grid supply and corporate clean energy strategies.

READ MORE:

Climate Impact Partners Unveils High-Quality Carbon Credits from Sabah Rainforest in Malaysia

Saptakee S

-

March 20, 2026

0

Climate Impact Partners Unveils High-Quality Carbon Credits from Sabah Rainforest in Malaysia

The voluntary carbon market is changing. Buyers are no longer focused only on large volumes of cheap credits. Instead, they want projects with strong science, long-term monitoring, and clear proof that carbon has truly been removed from the atmosphere. That shift is drawing more attention to high-integrity, nature-based projects.

One project now gaining that spotlight is the Sabah INFAPRO rainforest rehabilitation project in Malaysia. Climate Impact Partners announced that the project is now issuing verified carbon removal credits, opening access to one of the highest-quality nature-based removals currently available in the global market.

Restoring One of the World’s Richest Rainforest Ecosystems

The project is located in Sabah, Malaysia, on the island of Borneo. This region is home to tropical dipterocarp rainforest, one of the richest forest ecosystems on Earth. These forests store huge amounts of carbon and support extraordinary biodiversity. Some dipterocarp trees can grow up to 70 meters tall, creating habitat for orangutans, pygmy elephants, gibbons, sun bears, and the critically endangered Sumatran rhino.

However, the forest within the INFAPRO project area was not intact. In the 1980s, selective logging removed many of the most valuable tree species, especially large dipterocarps. That caused serious ecological damage. Once the key mother trees were gone, natural regeneration became much harder. Young seedlings also had to compete with dense vines and shrubs, which slowed the forest’s recovery.

To repair that damage, the INFAPRO project was launched in the Ulu-Segama forestry management unit in eastern Sabah.

The project has restored more than 25,000 hectares of logged-over rainforest.
It was developed by Face the Future in cooperation with Yayasan Sabah, while Climate Impact Partners has supported the project and helped bring its credits to market.

Why Sabah’s Carbon Removals are Attracting Attention

What makes Sabah INFAPRO different is not only the size of the restoration effort. It is also the way the project measured carbon gains.

SABAH MALAYSIA RAINFOREST — Source: face the future

Many forest carbon projects issue credits in annual vintages based on year-by-year growth estimates. Sabah INFAPRO followed a different path. It used a landscape-scale monitoring system and waited until the forest moved through its strongest natural growth period before issuing removal credits.

This approach gives the credits more weight. Rather than relying mainly on short-term annual estimates, the project measured carbon sequestration over a longer period. That helps show that the forest delivered real, sustained, and measurable carbon removal.

The scientific backing is also unusually strong. Since 2007, the project has maintained nearly 400 permanent monitoring plots. These plots have allowed researchers, independent auditors, and technical specialists to observe the full growth cycle of dipterocarp forest recovery. The result is a large body of field data that supports carbon calculations and strengthens confidence in the credits.

In simple terms, buyers are not just being asked to trust a model. They are being shown years of direct forest monitoring across the project landscape.

ALSO READ: ASEAN at COP30: How Malaysia Pushes Carbon Finance and Heritage Parks to the Forefront of Climate Action

Strong Ratings Support Market Confidence

Independent assessment has also lifted the project’s profile. BeZero awarded Sabah INFAPRO an A.pre overall rating and an AA score for permanence. That places the project among the highest-rated Improved Forest Management, or IFM, projects in the world.

The rating reflects several important strengths. First, the project has very low exposure to reversal risk. Second, it has a long and stable operating history. Third, its measured carbon gains align well with peer-reviewed ecological research and independent analysis.

These points matter in today’s market. Buyers have become more cautious after years of debate over the quality of some forest carbon credits. As a result, they now look more closely at durability, transparency, and third-party validation. Sabah INFAPRO’s rating helps answer those concerns and makes the project more attractive to companies looking for credible carbon removal.

The project is also registered with Verra’s Verified Carbon Standard under the name INFAPRO Rehabilitation of Logged-over Dipterocarp Forest in Sabah, Malaysia. That adds another level of market recognition and verification.

A Wider Model for Rainforest Recovery

Sabah INFAPRO also shows why high-quality nature-based projects are about more than carbon alone. The restoration effort supports broader ecological recovery in one of the world’s most important rainforest regions.

Climate Impact Partners said it has worked with project partners to restore degraded areas, run local training programs, carry out monthly forest patrols, and distribute seedlings to support rainforest recovery beyond the project boundary. These efforts help strengthen the wider landscape and expand the project’s environmental impact.

That broader value is becoming more important for buyers. Companies increasingly want projects that support biodiversity, ecosystem health, and local engagement, along with carbon removal. Sabah INFAPRO offers that mix, making it a stronger fit for the market’s shift toward higher-integrity credits.

Why IFM is Getting More Attention in the Carbon Market

The project’s launch also fits a wider shift in the voluntary carbon market. Improved Forest Management refers to practices that help existing forests store more carbon or avoid emissions through better stewardship. Unlike afforestation or reforestation, which involve creating or replanting forests, IFM focuses on improving the way current forests are managed.

These practices can help forests grow older, become more diverse, and stay healthier under climate stress. They can also support timber production in some cases by improving harvest cycles rather than stopping forest use altogether.

Because IFM projects often operate over very long periods, sometimes 100 years or more, they can generate lasting climate benefits. Still, buyers must be careful. Quality varies widely across projects, and strong due diligence remains essential.

IFM CARBON CREDITS

That is why Sabah INFAPRO is drawing attention. Although IFM supply has grown in recent years, truly high-quality carbon removal credits within the category remain limited.

Nature-Based Carbon Removal Still Leads the Market

Nature-based carbon removal continues to dominate the spot market, as reported by Carbon Direct. In 2025, about 95% of all carbon dioxide removal credits issued in the voluntary carbon market came from nature-based pathways. Only 5% came from higher-durability pathways such as biochar or BECCS.

This shows two things at once. First, nature-based carbon removal still plays the leading role in today’s market. Second, high-durability removal technologies are still at an early stage of deployment.

Demand Side:

Within nature-based credits, supply conditions differ sharply by project type.

Afforestation, reforestation, and revegetation, known as ARR, have remained tight. Over the past four years, ARR issuances and retirements have stayed close to a 1:1 ratio, while annual issuance has held nearly flat at around 7 million to 8 million metric tons. That has left limited ARR inventory available for spot buyers.
IFM has followed a different path. Issuances have grown about 2.5 times since 2023, making it one of the biggest growth areas in nature-based carbon credits. Even so, the supply of top-tier IFM carbon removal credits remains much smaller than headline volumes suggest.

Supply Side:

At the same time, buyer behavior is shifting. Demand has moved away from many older REDD+ projects and toward IFM, ARR, agriculture-based projects, and other credit types viewed as more credible or better aligned with corporate climate goals.

Retirements have dipped slightly, but that does not necessarily mean interest is fading. Buyer participation has remained steady. What changed is the purchasing strategy. Companies are becoming more selective about what they buy, when they buy, and how much they are willing to pay for quality.

Meanwhile, long-term nature-based offtakes and purchase commitments have risen above 90 million tons of future delivery. Most of those commitments are concentrated in ARR projects. That trend shows both how tight ARR supply is today and how seriously buyers are trying to secure future volume.

FOREST carbon credits

Against that backdrop, Sabah INFAPRO enters the market at the right time. It offers a rare mix of long-term monitoring, strong scientific backing, high biodiversity value, and verified removals. For buyers looking for high-quality nature-based carbon removal, this Malaysian rainforest project may become an important benchmark.

MUST READ: Carbon Sinks and Carbon Credits: How Nature and Innovation Are Fighting Climate Change

Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story

Jennifer L

-

March 20, 2026

0

Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story

Bitcoin’s recent drop below $70,000 reflects more than short-term market pressure. It signals a deeper shift. The world’s largest cryptocurrency is becoming increasingly tied to global energy markets.

For years, Bitcoin has moved mainly on investor sentiment, adoption trends, and regulation. Today, another force is shaping its direction: the cost of energy.

As oil prices rise and electricity markets tighten, Bitcoin is starting to behave less like a tech asset and more like an energy-dependent system. This shift is changing how investors, analysts, and policymakers understand crypto.

A Global Power Consumer: Inside Bitcoin’s Energy Use

Bitcoin depends on mining, a process that uses powerful computers to verify transactions. These machines run continuously and consume large amounts of electricity.

Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration shows Bitcoin mining used between 67 and 240 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in 2023, with a midpoint estimate of about 120 TWh.

Other estimates place consumption closer to 170 TWh per year in 2025. This accounts for roughly 0.5% of global electricity demand. Recently, as of February 2026, estimates see Bitcoin’s energy use reaching over 200 TWh per year.

That level of energy use is significant. Global electricity demand reached about 27,400 TWh in 2023. Bitcoin’s share may seem small, but it is comparable to the power use of mid-sized countries.

The network also requires steady power. Estimates suggest it draws around 10 gigawatts continuously, similar to several large power plants operating at full capacity. This constant demand makes energy costs central to Bitcoin’s economics.

When Oil Rises, Bitcoin Falls

Bitcoin mining is highly sensitive to electricity prices. Energy is the highest operating cost for miners. When power becomes more expensive, profit margins shrink.

Recent market movements show this link clearly. As oil prices rise and inflation concerns persist, energy costs have increased. At the same time, Bitcoin prices have weakened, falling below the $70,000 level.

bitcoin price below $70000 — Source: Coindesk

This is not a coincidence. Studies show a direct relationship between Bitcoin prices, mining activity, and electricity use. When Bitcoin prices rise, more miners join the network, increasing energy demand. When energy costs rise, less efficient miners may shut down, reducing activity and adding selling pressure.

This creates a feedback loop between crypto and energy markets. Bitcoin is no longer driven only by demand and speculation. It is now influenced by the same forces that affect oil, gas, and power prices.

Cleaner Energy Use Is Growing, but Fossil Fuels Still Matter

Bitcoin’s environmental impact depends on its energy mix. This mix is improving, but it remains uneven.

A 2025 study from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance found that 52.4% of Bitcoin mining now uses sustainable energy. This includes both renewable sources (42.6%) and nuclear power (9.8%). The share has risen significantly from about 37.6% in 2022.

Despite this progress, fossil fuels still account for a large portion of mining energy. Natural gas alone makes up about 38.2%, while coal continues to contribute a smaller share.

bitcoin electricity by source — Source: Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF)

This reliance on fossil fuels keeps emissions high. Current estimates suggest Bitcoin produces more than 114 million tons of carbon dioxide each year. That puts it in line with emissions from some industrial sectors.

The shift toward cleaner energy is real, but it is not complete. The pace of change will play a key role in how Bitcoin fits into global climate goals.

Bitcoin’s Climate Debate Intensifies

Bitcoin’s growing energy demand has placed it at the center of ESG discussions. Its impact is often measured through three key areas:

Total electricity use, which rivals that of entire countries.
Carbon emissions are estimated at over 100 million tons of CO₂ annually.
Energy intensity, with a single transaction using large amounts of power.

bitcoin environmental footprints — Source: Digiconomist

At the same time, the industry is evolving. Mining companies are adopting more efficient hardware and exploring new energy sources. Some operations use excess renewable power or capture waste energy, such as flare gas from oil fields.

These efforts show progress, but they do not fully address the concerns. The gap between Bitcoin’s energy use and its environmental impact remains a key issue for investors and regulators.

MUST READ: Bitcoin Price Hits All-Time High Above $126K: ETFs, Market Drivers, and the Future of Digital Gold

Bitcoin Is Becoming Part of the Energy System

Bitcoin mining is now closely integrated with the broader energy system. Operators often choose locations based on access to cheap or excess electricity. This includes areas with strong renewable generation or underused energy resources.

This integration creates both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, mining can support energy systems by using power that might otherwise go to waste. It can also provide flexible demand that helps stabilize grids.

On the other hand, it can increase pressure on local electricity supplies and extend the use of fossil fuels if cleaner options are not available.

In the United States, Bitcoin mining could account for up to 2.3% of total electricity demand in certain scenarios. This highlights how quickly the sector is scaling and how closely it is tied to national energy systems.

Energy Markets Are Now Key to Bitcoin’s Future

Looking ahead, the connection between Bitcoin and energy is expected to grow stronger. The network’s computing power, or hash rate, continues to reach new highs, which typically leads to higher energy use.

Electricity will remain the main cost for miners. This means Bitcoin will continue to respond to changes in energy prices and supply conditions. At the same time, governments are starting to pay closer attention to crypto’s environmental impact, which could shape future regulations.

Bitcoin annual carbon emissions to 2100 — Source: Qin, S. et al. Bitcoin’s future carbon footprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.02612

Some forecasts suggest Bitcoin’s energy use could rise sharply if adoption increases, potentially reaching up to 400 TWh in extreme scenarios. However, cleaner energy systems could reduce the carbon impact over time.

Bitcoin is no longer just a financial asset. It is also a large-scale energy consumer and a growing part of the global power system.

As a result, understanding Bitcoin now requires a broader view. Energy prices, electricity markets, and carbon trends are becoming just as important as market demand and investor sentiment.

The message is clear. As energy markets move, Bitcoin is likely to move with them.

READ MORE: Bitcoin ETFs Rebound with $697M as Blockchain Brings Trust to Carbon Markets

LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up

Saptakee S

-

March 20, 2026

0

LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up

The LEGO Group is giving its new Virginia factory a major clean energy upgrade. The company plans to build a large on-site solar park at LEGO Manufacturing Virginia in Chesterfield County. At the same time, it will add thousands of rooftop solar panels across the site.

Together, these projects mark a big step toward LEGO’s goal of covering 100% of the facility’s yearly electricity needs with renewable energy. The move also shows how the toy giant is tying factory expansion to its wider climate strategy.

A Big Solar Build for a Big Factory

The company announced that its Virginia site is one of its biggest investments in the U.S, having more than 28 MWp of on-site solar capacity in total. Now it is also becoming one of its most important clean energy projects.

Construction on the solar park should begin in summer 2026. The ground-mounted system will include more than 30,700 solar panels and deliver 22 megawatt-peak (MWp) of capacity.
The solar park will spread across nearly 80 acres at the Chesterfield factory site. On top of that, LEGO plans to install 10,080 rooftop solar panels, adding another 6.11 MWp.

Thus, it is a core part of how the company wants this factory to operate from the start.

Lego also said the solar build is a major milestone in its effort to source renewable energy for the plant’s annual needs. That matters because the factory is being designed as a long-term manufacturing hub, not just a packaging or distribution site.

Jesus Ibañez, General Manager of LEGO Manufacturing Virginia, said:

“We’re proud of the progress we continue to make. These initiatives are key to increasing our use of renewable energy and support our ongoing commitment towards more sustainable operations.”

Using Mass Timber for Low- Carbon Factory

The solar park is only one part of the Virginia story. LEGO is also trying to reduce the site’s footprint through the building design itself.

Construction is moving ahead on schedule after the main factory reached its steel topping-out milestone in October 2025. The site’s office space, built with mass timber, is expected to top out later in spring 2026. Mass timber matters because it is a renewable material and can store carbon, unlike many traditional building materials that come with heavier emissions.

Focuses on Energy, Waste, and Better Materials

LEGO also wants the facility to earn LEED Platinum certification once completed. That target covers energy, water, and waste performance. The company further said the Virginia site shares the same goal as all LEGO operations: zero waste to landfill.

In simple terms, it wants almost all factory waste to be reused, recycled, composted, or sent to non-landfill treatment.

These details matter because clean power alone does not make a factory sustainable. Companies also need smarter materials, better energy use, and stronger waste systems. LEGO seems to be taking that broader route here.

Long-Term Impact: Jobs and Local Growth

The Virginia factory is not just about energy. It is also a major job project.

More than 500 people already work across the factory under construction and LEGO’s temporary packing facility. That number is expected to rise to about 900 by the end of 2026 as the company gets ready to run highly automated molding and packing equipment.

The overall investment in the site and regional distribution center is more than $1.5 billion. The full campus covers 340 acres and includes 13 buildings with roughly 1.7 million square feet of space. LEGO has said the site is expected to create more than 1,700 jobs over 10 years.

The company is also trying to build stronger local ties while construction continues. In February 2026, LEGO announced more than $1.3 million in grants for eight nonprofit groups in the Greater Richmond area. Since 2022, it has provided more than $3.5 million in local grants through the LEGO Foundation.

So, the Virginia site is becoming more than a factory. It is shaping up as a long-term regional base for manufacturing, jobs, and community funding.

READ MORE: LEGO Bets Bold on Renewable Resin Bricks Amid Massive Revenue Growth

Is LEGO’s Net-Zero Plan Still A Work in Progress?

The company has committed to reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 across its full value chain. The Virginia solar project also fits into LEGO’s bigger climate plan.

It also has near-term targets validated by the Science Based Targets initiative, aiming to cut absolute Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 37% by 2032 from a 2019 baseline, and reduce Scope 3 emissions by the same amount. Those targets align with the 1.5°C pathway.

However, the toy maker’s emissions rose in 2024 as consumer sales grew faster than expected. Its greenhouse gas emissions are approximately 144,400 metric tons of CO₂‑equivalent (around 144.4 million kg CO₂e) globally.

carbon emissions

The company noted that higher product demand pushed carbon emissions 3.9% above target, even as it increased spending on more sustainable manufacturing. This means that when a business grows fast, cutting emissions gets harder, not easier.

Even so, LEGO says it remains committed to its climate goals and is investing in local solutions at each factory rather than using a one-size-fits-all model. That approach makes sense because every site has different energy systems, weather, and infrastructure options.

Renewable Growth Spreads Across Global Sites

The company also expanded renewable energy projects at other locations in 2024. It added 6.64 MWp of solar capacity across operations globally, a 43% increase from the previous year.

In Kladno, Czech Republic, it expanded rooftop solar by 1.5 MWp, bringing total capacity there to 2.5 MWp.
In Billund, Denmark, it added 4.4 MWp, bringing the site’s total solar capacity to 5.5 MWp.

It also cut Scope 1 emissions in Billund by moving 11 buildings from natural gas to district heating, saving about 1,064 tonnes of CO2e each year. Meanwhile, LEGO launched a geothermal project in Hungary and upgraded heat-recovery systems in Jiaxing, China, to reduce gas use.

Progress in Waste Reduction

In 2024, its manufacturing sites generated a total of 25,859 tonnes of waste, which was 7.6% below the target of 28,000 tonnes.

As a remedy for this situation, factories in Denmark, China, and Mexico improved moulding processes to recover more raw materials and cut waste. These efforts reduced scrap by more than 160 tons, helped by digital tools that identified materials for reuse and improved efficiency.

Additionally, in the Czech Republic, it also introduced more circular packing methods. The factory reused 39% of cardboard tube cores from suppliers and tested returnable inbound packaging, cutting waste by more than 39 tons a year.

Of course, none of this solves LEGO’s full emissions challenge overnight. Scope 3 emissions across the supply chain will still be the harder part.

However, taken together, these efforts show a company trying to clean up its manufacturing footprint piece by piece. The Virginia project stands out because of its scale, but it is part of a wider pattern. Even though it is still under construction, it already shows what modern industrial planning can look like: on-site renewables, lower-carbon materials, waste reduction, and job creation in one package.

But this project gives LEGO something important: a real, visible step forward. And in climate action, visible progress matters.

ALSO SEE: LEGO Expands Carbon Removal Portfolio with $2.8M Investment for Net-Zero Goals

From Act to Action: India’s Carbon Market Story

2022: Laying the Foundation

2023: Introducing the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS)

2024: Detailed Rules for Compliance Mechanism

Why the Portal Matters for Companies, Offsets, and Climate Goals

The Digital Backbone of India’s Carbon Market

Voluntary Carbon Credits Expand India’s Market Reach

Supporting India’s Net Zero Goal

Demand Response: Turning Data Centers into Flexible Grid Assets

Why Peak Demand Matters for Costs and Reliability

Cost Savings and Reliability Gains

A Shift in Energy Strategy for Big Tech

Linking Demand Response to Google’s 24/7 Carbon-Free Goals

The Future of Demand Response in AI and Cloud Operations

A Cost-Effective Tool for Modern Grids

Tesla’s Solar Dream Is Getting Bigger

The Cost Gap Keeps China in Charge of Solar Supply Chains

Why Tesla May Be Making This Move Now

Texas Solar Capacity Supports Tesla and SpaceX

Snapshot of US Solar Imports

A Massive Opportunity, But Also a Huge Challenge

What Is the EU Emissions Trading System and Why Change It?

Carbon Pricing in Europe: The Stakes and the Context

A New €30 Billion Cleantech Fund to Boost Decarbonization

Renewables, Baseload, and Energy Market Trends in Europe

Industry Reaction: Balancing Flexibility and Climate Signals

Looking Ahead: Combining Policy and Investment for Climate Goals

What Causes Lithium Prices to Rebound

Lithium’s Double Boost: AI + Data Center Batteries

Surge Battery Metals Step Into the Spotlight

Nevada North: High-Grade, High Stakes

From Clay to Clean Energy

Live Lithium Spot Price

A Major Investment in Next-Generation Geothermal

From Niche to Necessary: Geothermal’s Small Share but Large Potential

Technology Is Unlocking New Geothermal Resources

Why 24/7 Clean Energy Is in High Demand

Investment Trends Support Geothermal Growth

A New Role for Geothermal in the Energy Transition

A Big Step for Corporate Clean Power Buying

Texas: A Growing Hub for Clean Power

What the Norton Solar Project Means in Numbers

From Solar to EVs: Toyota’s Bigger Climate Strategy

Corporate Clean Energy Buying Hits New Highs

Looking Ahead: Renewables, EVs, and Decarbonization

Restoring One of the World’s Richest Rainforest Ecosystems

Why Sabah’s Carbon Removals are Attracting Attention

Strong Ratings Support Market Confidence

A Wider Model for Rainforest Recovery

Why IFM is Getting More Attention in the Carbon Market

Nature-Based Carbon Removal Still Leads the Market

Demand Side:

Supply Side:

A Global Power Consumer: Inside Bitcoin’s Energy Use

When Oil Rises, Bitcoin Falls

Cleaner Energy Use Is Growing, but Fossil Fuels Still Matter

Bitcoin’s Climate Debate Intensifies

Bitcoin Is Becoming Part of the Energy System

Energy Markets Are Now Key to Bitcoin’s Future

A Big Solar Build for a Big Factory

Using Mass Timber for Low- Carbon Factory

Focuses on Energy, Waste, and Better Materials

Long-Term Impact: Jobs and Local Growth

Is LEGO’s Net-Zero Plan Still A Work in Progress?

Renewable Growth Spreads Across Global Sites

Progress in Waste Reduction

Editor Picks

Free Carbon Report